OBJECTIVE: The fallopian tube is considered as the site of origin of serous ovarian cancer, and risk-reducing salpingectomy (RRS) has been proposed as a new and safe strategy for preventing ovarian cancer. However, little is known about the public perception of RRS. METHODS: We performed a questionnaire survey of 100 healthy female volunteers in November 2014. Questionnaire for this survey included questions on demographics, medical history, knowledge of and belief about RRS, and barrier to its application. RESULTS: Among 100 respondents, 71% did not realize the seriousness of ovarian cancer, 79% were unaware of the fact that salpinx was the origin of ovarian cancer, and 87% stated that they had never heard of RRS as a preventive method for ovarian cancer. Also, 98% of respondents replied that they had the right to be informed about RRS and the choice given. The respondents' fears about RRS included increased risk of surgical complications (68%), no benefit (8%), and increased surgical costs (3%). CONCLUSION: Most general women were unaware of RRS as a method for preventing ovarian cancer in women at average risk. Therefore, physicians should discuss RRS with patients and consider this procedure at the time of abdominal or pelvic surgery.
OBJECTIVE: The fallopian tube is considered as the site of origin of serous ovarian cancer, and risk-reducing salpingectomy (RRS) has been proposed as a new and safe strategy for preventing ovarian cancer. However, little is known about the public perception of RRS. METHODS: We performed a questionnaire survey of 100 healthy female volunteers in November 2014. Questionnaire for this survey included questions on demographics, medical history, knowledge of and belief about RRS, and barrier to its application. RESULTS: Among 100 respondents, 71% did not realize the seriousness of ovarian cancer, 79% were unaware of the fact that salpinx was the origin of ovarian cancer, and 87% stated that they had never heard of RRS as a preventive method for ovarian cancer. Also, 98% of respondents replied that they had the right to be informed about RRS and the choice given. The respondents' fears about RRS included increased risk of surgical complications (68%), no benefit (8%), and increased surgical costs (3%). CONCLUSION: Most general women were unaware of RRS as a method for preventing ovarian cancer in women at average risk. Therefore, physicians should discuss RRS with patients and consider this procedure at the time of abdominal or pelvic surgery.
Entities:
Keywords:
Data collection; Ovarian neoplasms; Public perception; Risk-reducing salpingectomy
Authors: Kyu-Won Jung; Young-Joo Won; Hyun-Joo Kong; Chang-Mo Oh; Duk Hyoung Lee; Jin Soo Lee Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-04-22 Impact factor: 4.679
Authors: A-B Skytte; A-M Gerdes; M K Andersen; L Sunde; K Brøndum-Nielsen; M Waldstrøm; S Kølvraa; D Crüger Journal: Clin Genet Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 4.438
Authors: Galina Lurie; Lynne R Wilkens; Pamela J Thompson; Rayna K Matsuno; Michael E Carney; Marc T Goodman Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Kelly A Metcalfe; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Henry Lynch; Pal Moller; Parviz Ghadirian; William D Foulkes; Jan Klijn; Eitan Friedman; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Peter Ainsworth; Barry Rosen; Susan Domchek; Teresa Wagner; Nadine Tung; Siranoush Manoukian; Fergus Couch; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Saundra S Buys; Edward Partridge; Amanda Black; Christine C Johnson; Lois Lamerato; Claudine Isaacs; Douglas J Reding; Robert T Greenlee; Lance A Yokochi; Bruce Kessel; E David Crawford; Timothy R Church; Gerald L Andriole; Joel L Weissfeld; Mona N Fouad; David Chia; Barbara O'Brien; Lawrence R Ragard; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Patricia Hartge; Paul F Pinsky; Claire S Zhu; Grant Izmirlian; Barnett S Kramer; Anthony B Miller; Jian-Lun Xu; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 157.335