Literature DB >> 26216994

Indirect nitrous oxide emissions from streams within the US Corn Belt scale with stream order.

Peter A Turner1, Timothy J Griffis2, Xuhui Lee3, John M Baker4, Rodney T Venterea4, Jeffrey D Wood2.   

Abstract

N2O is an important greenhouse gas and the primary stratospheric ozone depleting substance. Its deleterious effects on the environment have prompted appeals to regulate emissions from agriculture, which represents the primary anthropogenic source in the global N2O budget. Successful implementation of mitigation strategies requires robust bottom-up inventories that are based on emission factors (EFs), simulation models, or a combination of the two. Top-down emission estimates, based on tall-tower and aircraft observations, indicate that bottom-up inventories severely underestimate regional and continental scale N2O emissions, implying that EFs may be biased low. Here, we measured N2O emissions from streams within the US Corn Belt using a chamber-based approach and analyzed the data as a function of Strahler stream order (S). N2O fluxes from headwater streams often exceeded 29 nmol N2O-N m(-2) ⋅ s(-1) and decreased exponentially as a function of S. This relation was used to scale up riverine emissions and to assess the differences between bottom-up and top-down emission inventories at the local to regional scale. We found that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) indirect EF for rivers (EF5r) is underestimated up to ninefold in southern Minnesota, which translates to a total tier 1 agricultural underestimation of N2O emissions by 40%. We show that accounting for zero-order streams as potential N2O hotspots can more than double the agricultural budget. Applying the same analysis to the US Corn Belt demonstrates that the IPCC EF5r underestimation explains the large differences observed between top-down and bottom-up emission estimates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IPCC emission factors; aquatic nitrous oxide fluxes; regional emission upscaling; river emission hotspots

Year:  2015        PMID: 26216994      PMCID: PMC4538644          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503598112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  18 in total

1.  Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Stream denitrification across biomes and its response to anthropogenic nitrate loading.

Authors:  Patrick J Mulholland; Ashley M Helton; Geoffrey C Poole; Robert O Hall; Stephen K Hamilton; Bruce J Peterson; Jennifer L Tank; Linda R Ashkenas; Lee W Cooper; Clifford N Dahm; Walter K Dodds; Stuart E G Findlay; Stanley V Gregory; Nancy B Grimm; Sherri L Johnson; William H McDowell; Judy L Meyer; H Maurice Valett; Jackson R Webster; Clay P Arango; Jake J Beaulieu; Melody J Bernot; Amy J Burgin; Chelsea L Crenshaw; Laura T Johnson; B R Niederlehner; Jonathan M O'Brien; Jody D Potter; Richard W Sheibley; Daniel J Sobota; Suzanne M Thomas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Automated, low-power chamber system for measuring nitrous oxide emissions.

Authors:  Joel J Fassbinder; Natalie M Schultz; John M Baker; Timothy J Griffis
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.751

4.  Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater streams.

Authors:  B J Peterson; W M Wollheim; P J Mulholland; J R Webster; J L Meyer; J L Tank; E Marti; W B Bowden; H M Valett; A E Hershey; W H McDowell; W K Dodds; S K Hamilton; S Gregory; D D Morrall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters.

Authors:  Peter A Raymond; Jens Hartmann; Ronny Lauerwald; Sebastian Sobek; Cory McDonald; Mark Hoover; David Butman; Robert Striegl; Emilio Mayorga; Christoph Humborg; Pirkko Kortelainen; Hans Dürr; Michel Meybeck; Philippe Ciais; Peter Guth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Indirect nitrous oxide emissions from surface water bodies in a lowland arable catchment: a significant contribution to agricultural greenhouse gas budgets?

Authors:  Faye N Outram; Kevin M Hiscock
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  The spatial distribution and emission of nitrous oxide (N2O) in a large eutrophic lake in eastern China: anthropogenic effects.

Authors:  Shilu Wang; Congqiang Liu; Kevin M Yeager; Guojiang Wan; Jun Li; Faxiang Tao; Yingchun Lu; Fang Liu; Chengxin Fan
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Dissolved nitrous oxide concentrations and fluxes from the eutrophic San Joaquin River, California.

Authors:  Sarra E Hinshaw; Randy A Dahlgren
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 9.  A post-Kyoto partner: considering the stratospheric ozone regime as a tool to manage nitrous oxide.

Authors:  David Kanter; Denise L Mauzerall; A R Ravishankara; John S Daniel; Robert W Portmann; Peter M Grabiel; William R Moomaw; James N Galloway
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The Role of Headwater Streams in Downstream Water Quality.

Authors:  Richard B Alexander; Elizabeth W Boyer; Richard A Smith; Gregory E Schwarz; Richard B Moore
Journal:  J Am Water Resour Assoc       Date:  2007-02
View more
  7 in total

1.  Role of surface and subsurface processes in scaling N2O emissions along riverine networks.

Authors:  Alessandra Marzadri; Martha M Dee; Daniele Tonina; Alberto Bellin; Jennifer L Tank
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils challenge climate sustainability in the US Corn Belt.

Authors:  Nathaniel C Lawrence; Carlos G Tenesaca; Andy VanLoocke; Steven J Hall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nitrous oxide emissions are enhanced in a warmer and wetter world.

Authors:  Timothy J Griffis; Zichong Chen; John M Baker; Jeffrey D Wood; Dylan B Millet; Xuhui Lee; Rodney T Venterea; Peter A Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Widespread nitrous oxide undersaturation in farm waterbodies creates an unexpected greenhouse gas sink.

Authors:  Jackie R Webb; Nicole M Hayes; Gavin L Simpson; Peter R Leavitt; Helen M Baulch; Kerri Finlay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Forest streams are important sources for nitrous oxide emissions.

Authors:  Joachim Audet; David Bastviken; Mirco Bundschuh; Ishi Buffam; Alexander Feckler; Leif Klemedtsson; Hjalmar Laudon; Stefan Löfgren; Sivakiruthika Natchimuthu; Mats Öquist; Mike Peacock; Marcus B Wallin
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 10.863

6.  Unexpectedly minor nitrous oxide emissions from fluvial networks draining permafrost catchments of the East Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.

Authors:  Liwei Zhang; Sibo Zhang; Xinghui Xia; Tom J Battin; Shaoda Liu; Qingrui Wang; Ran Liu; Zhifeng Yang; Jinren Ni; Emily H Stanley
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Century-long changes and drivers of soil nitrous oxide (N2 O) emissions across the contiguous United States.

Authors:  Chaoqun Lu; Zhen Yu; Jien Zhang; Peiyu Cao; Hanqin Tian; Cynthia Nevison
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 13.211

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.