| Literature DB >> 26216390 |
Scott Cunningham1, Keith Finlay2.
Abstract
Successful supply-side interdictions into illegal drug markets are predicated on the responsiveness of drug prices to enforcement and the price elasticity of demand for addictive drugs. We present causal estimates that targeted interventions aimed at methamphetamine input markets ('precursor control') can temporarily increase retail street prices, but methamphetamine consumption is weakly responsive to higher drug prices. After the supply interventions, purity-adjusted prices increased then quickly returned to pre-treatment levels within 6-12 months, demonstrating the short-term effects of precursor control. The price elasticity of methamphetamine demand is -0.13 to -0.21 for self-admitted drug treatment admissions and between -0.24 and -0.28 for hospital inpatient admissions. We find some evidence of a positive cross-price effect for cocaine, but we do not find robust evidence that increases in methamphetamine prices increased heroin, alcohol, or marijuana drug use. This study can inform policy discussions regarding other synthesized drugs, including illicit use of pharmaceuticals.Entities:
Keywords: addiction; demand; illegal drugs; methamphetamine; substitution; war on drugs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26216390 DOI: 10.1002/hec.3213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Econ ISSN: 1057-9230 Impact factor: 3.046