Literature DB >> 26216386

Comparison of two different S-1 plus cisplatin dosing schedules as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic and/or recurrent gastric cancer: a multicenter, randomized phase III trial (SOS).

M-H Ryu1, E Baba2, K H Lee3, Y I Park4, N Boku5, I Hyodo6, B-H Nam7, T Esaki8, C Yoo1, B-Y Ryoo1, E-K Song9, S-H Cho10, W K Kang11, S H Yang12, D Y Zang13, D B Shin14, S R Park1, K Shinozaki15, T Takano16, Y-K Kang17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Five-weekly S-1 plus cisplatin (SP5) is one of the standard first-line regimens for advanced gastric cancer (GC), proven in a Japanese phase III study. To enhance the dose intensity of cisplatin, 3-weekly S-1 plus cisplatin (SP3) was developed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study evaluated whether SP3 (S-1 80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-14 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1) was noninferior/superior to SP5 (S-1 80-120 mg/day on days 1-21 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 or 8) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic, recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were randomized 1 : 1 to receive either SP3 or SP5. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00915382).
RESULTS: Between February 2009 and January 2012, 625 patients were randomized at 42 sites in Korea and Japan. With a median follow-up duration of 32.4 months (range, 13.3-48.6 months) in surviving patients, SP3 was not only noninferior but also superior to SP5 in terms of PFS [median 5.5 versus 4.9 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.99; P = 0.0418 for superiority). There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between the groups (median 14.1 versus 13.9 months; HR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.81-1.21; P = 0.9068). In patients with measurable disease, the response rates were 60% in the SP3 arm and 50% in the SP5 arm (P = 0.065). Both regimens were generally well tolerated, but grade 3 or higher anemia (19% versus 9%) and neutropenia (39% versus 9%) were more frequent in SP3.
CONCLUSIONS: SP3 is superior to SP5 in terms of PFS. However, since the improvement in PFS was only slight and there was no difference in OS, both SP3 and SP5 can be recommended as first-line treatments for patients with advanced GC.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  S-1; chemotherapy; cisplatin; gastric cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26216386     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  12 in total

Review 1.  Gastric cancer surgery: historical background and perspective in Western countries versus Japan.

Authors:  Chun-Dong Zhang; Hiroharu Yamashita; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

2.  Five-weekly S-1 plus cisplatin therapy combined with trastuzumab therapy in HER2-positive gastric cancer: a phase II trial and biomarker study (WJOG7212G).

Authors:  Yuji Miura; Yasutaka Sukawa; Shuichi Hironaka; Misuzu Mori; Kazuhiro Nishikawa; Shinya Tokunaga; Hiroyuki Okuda; Takeshi Sakamoto; Keisei Taku; Kazuo Nishikawa; Toshikazu Moriwaki; Yuji Negoro; Yutaka Kimura; Keita Uchino; Katsunori Shinozaki; Hiroharu Shinozaki; Nobuyuki Musha; Hirotsugu Yoshiyama; Takashi Tsuda; Yoshinori Miyata; Naotoshi Sugimoto; Tsuyoshi Shirakawa; Miki Ito; Kimio Yonesaka; Kenichi Yoshimura; Narikazu Boku; Katsuhiko Nosho; Toshimi Takano; Ichinosuke Hyodo
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 3.  Global chemotherapy development for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazuto Harada; Dilsa Mizrak Kaya; Yusuke Shimodaira; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Phase I study of orally administered S-1 in combination with epirubicin and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors and chemotherapy-naïve advanced or metastatic esophagogastric cancer.

Authors:  Markus Moehler; Rolf Mahlberg; Volker Heinemann; Radka Obermannová; Eugen Kubala; Bohuslav Melichar; Arndt Weinmann; Paul Scigalla; Marietta Tesařová; Petr Janda; Fabienne Hédouin-Biville; Wasat Mansoor
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Vorinostat in combination with capecitabine plus cisplatin as a first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic or unresectable gastric cancer: phase II study and biomarker analysis.

Authors:  Changhoon Yoo; Min-Hee Ryu; Young-Soon Na; Baek-Yeol Ryoo; Chae-Won Lee; Yoon-Koo Kang
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Unresectable Advanced Gastric Cancer with Skin Invasion followed by Total Gastrectomy after Second-Line Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hidenori Maki; Yasuhiro Yuasa; Satoshi Fujiwara; Mizuki Fukuta; Taihei Takeuchi; Keisuke Fujimoto; Takao Tsuneki; Yuta Matsuo; Osamu Mori; Shohei Eto; Atsushi Tomibayashi; Hisashi Ishikura
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2019-08-20

7.  Trends in Chemotherapy Patterns and Survival of Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer over a 16-Year Period: Impact of Anti-HER2-Targeted Agent in the Real-World Setting.

Authors:  Dong-Hoe Koo; Min-Hee Ryu; Mi-Yeon Lee; Heejung Chae; Eo Jin Kim; Mee-Sun Moon; Yoon-Koo Kang
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.679

8.  Survival outcomes of management in metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Huang-Ming Hu; Hui-Jen Tsai; Hsiu-Ying Ku; Su-Shun Lo; Yan-Shen Shan; Hung-Chi Chang; Yee Chao; Jen-Shi Chen; Shu-Chen Chen; Chun-Ju Chiang; Anna Fen-Yau Li; Hsiu-Po Wang; Tsang-En Wang; Li-Yuan Bai; Ming-Shiang Wu; Li-Tzong Chen; Tsang-Wu Liu; Yi-Hsin Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Phase II trial of capecitabine plus modified cisplatin (mXP) as first-line therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic gastric cancer (KSCC1104).

Authors:  Hironaga Satake; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Yoshikazu Uenosono; Takeshi Shiraishi; Hiroaki Tanioka; Hiroshi Saeki; Keishi Sugimachi; Dai Kitagawa; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Eiji Oki; Yasunori Emi; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Akihito Tsuji; Yoshito Akagi; Shoji Natsugoe; Hideo Baba; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 10.  Systematic bias between blinded independent central review and local assessment: literature review and analyses of 76 phase III randomised controlled trials in 45 688 patients with advanced solid tumour.

Authors:  Jianrong Zhang; Yiyin Zhang; Shiyan Tang; Long Jiang; Qihua He; Lindsey Tristine Hamblin; Jiaxi He; Zhiheng Xu; Jieyu Wu; Yaoqi Chen; Hengrui Liang; Difei Chen; Yu Huang; Xinyu Wang; Kexin Deng; Shuhan Jiang; Jiaqing Zhou; Jiaxuan Xu; Xuanzuo Chen; Wenhua Liang; Jianxing He
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.