| Literature DB >> 26215815 |
Peter A Dargaville1, Anna Lavizzari, Priscila Padoin, Don Black, Elroy Zonneveld, Elizabeth Perkins, Magdy Sourial, Anushi E Rajapaksa, Peter G Davis, Stuart B Hooper, Timothy Jm Moss, Graeme R Polglase, David G Tingay.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The surge in uptake of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for respiratory support in preterm infants has occurred in the absence of an authentic animal model. Such a model would allow investigation of research questions of physiological and therapeutic importance. We therefore aimed to develop a preterm lamb model of the non-intubated very preterm infant on CPAP.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26215815 PMCID: PMC4512986 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-015-0051-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp ISSN: 2197-425X
Figure 1Nasopharyngeal anatomy in the preterm lamb. Computed tomographic images of the snout in a preterm lamb at 129 days gestation. (A) Parasagittal image showing dilatation of the nasal cavity deep within the nasopharynx. Path of nasal CPAP prong indicated by dotted white line (depth 6.5 cm). (B) 3D reconstruction of sagittal CT images; position of CPAP prong tip and epiglottis indicated by black and white arrows, respectively.
Figure 2Cardiorespiratory indices. Mean and SE for cardiorespiratory indices at each experimental time point. Black arrow indicates the time of the first CPAP trial. (A) Heart rate, (B) mean blood pressure, (C) FiO2, (D) arterial pH, (E) PaCO2 and (F) AaDO2. *Differs from pre-CPAP value, P < 0.05, ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test. CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; AaDO2, alveolar-arterial oxygen difference.
Figure 3Respiratory patterns (I). Representative tracings of RIP voltage (top) and airway opening pressure (bottom) during the experiment. Note differing time scales between panels. (A) Lamb 5 at 5 min of life; full NIPPV support, no spontaneous breathing. (B) Lamb 5 pre-CPAP; on NIPPV, regular spontaneous breaths seen in addition to mechanically assisted breaths. (C) Lamb 8 soon after transition to CPAP; initially regular spontaneous breathing gradually slows to apnoea. RIP, respiratory inductance plethysmography; NIPPV, nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure.
Figure 4Respiratory patterns (II). Representative tracings of RIP voltage (top) and airway opening pressure (bottom) during the experiment. (A) Lamb 7 at 35 min after first attempt at CPAP transition; initial apnoea is followed by prompt return of spontaneous respiratory effort after reinstitution of NIPPV. (B) Lamb 8 at 30 min post-CPAP; NIPPV does not result in mechanically assisted breaths but does interfere with the cadence of spontaneous breathing. (C) Lamb 7 at 150 min; comfortably breathing on CPAP alone, spontaneous respiratory rate 65/min, PaCO2 44 mm Hg and FiO2 0.21. See Figure 3 legend for abbreviations.
NIPPV requirements and respiratory rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Initial | 10 (100) | 30 ± 0 | 25 ± 9.2 | 24 ± 24 | 50 ± 20 |
| Pre-CPAP | 10 (100) | 30 ± 0 | 26 ± 8.9 | 21 ± 31 | 47 ± 25 |
| 15 min post-CPAP | 5 (50) | 15 ± 14 | 3.9 ± 5.9b | 39 ± 30 | 43 ± 30 |
| 30 min post-CPAP | 6 (60) | 23 ± 11 | 14 ± 14 | 34 ± 30 | 48 ± 25 |
| 45 min post-CPAP | 6 (60) | 26 ± 10 | 14 ± 14 | 39 ± 32 | 52 ± 22 |
| 60 min post-CPAP | 4 (40) | 22 ± 20 | 8.8 ± 16b | 41 ± 30 | 50 ± 22 |
| 90 min post-CPAP | 3 (30) | 33 ± 6.0 | 8.9 ± 14 | 49 ± 30 | 58 ± 25 |
| 120 min post-CPAP | 1 (10) | 46 ± 0 | 4.6 ± 15b | 55 ± 21b | 60 ± 20 |
| 150 min post-CPAP | 2 (20) | 31 ± 1.4 | 4.7 ± 10b | 56 ± 24b | 61 ± 15 |
Values for NIPPV requirements and respiratory rates at each time point; mean ± SD unless stated. Respiratory rate (RR) counted in a 2-min window; reported values are for all lambs, whether or not receiving NIPPV. See text for definition of mechanically assisted breath. aReported value for set NIPPV rate includes only lambs receiving NIPPV. bDiffers from pre-CPAP value, P < 0.05, ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test.