| Literature DB >> 26215813 |
Alejandra López1, Juan Carlos Grignola, Martín Angulo, Ignacio Alvez, Nicolás Nin, Gonzalo Lacuesta, Manuel Baz, Pablo Cardinal, Ivana Prestes, Juan P Bouchacourt, Juan Riva, Can Ince, Francisco Javier Hurtado.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microcirculation and macrohemodynamics are severely compromised during septic shock. However, the relationship between these two compartments needs to be further investigated. We hypothesized that early resuscitation restores left ventricular (LV) performance and microcirculatory function but fails to prevent metabolic disorders. We studied the effects of an early resuscitation protocol (ERP) on LV pressure/volume loops-derived parameters, sublingual microcirculation, and metabolic alterations during endotoxic shock.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26215813 PMCID: PMC4513023 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-015-0049-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp ISSN: 2197-425X
Figure 1LV function parameters. LPS group (white bars), ERP group (gray bars), and Sham group (black bars). T0, baseline T180; final values (mean ± SD). SW, stroke work; LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; PRSW, preload recruitable stroke work. *p < .05 compared to baseline values; ‡p < .05 when compared to LPS group; §p < .05 when compared to other groups.
Systemic hemodynamics and metabolic data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAP (mm Hg) | T0 | 92.3 ± 20.1 | 85.7 ± 22.1 | 86.4 ± 18.1 |
| T180 | 38.1 ± 16.2 * | 57.8 ± 10.8 * § | 84.2 ± 12 § | |
| CVP (mm Hg) | T0 | 7.1 ± 3.5 | 4.8 ± 2.8 | 5.1 ± 2.1 |
| T180 | 6.5 ± 2.9 | 7.1 ± 2.3 | 7 ± 2.1 | |
| PAOP (mm Hg) | T0 | 5.6 ± 2.7 | 5.3 ± 2.4 | 5.5 ± 4.5 |
| T180 | 6.4 ± 2.7 | 6.9 ± 3.4 | 6.5 ± 4 | |
| HR (bpm) | T0 | 97 ± 18 | 100 ± 24 | 98 ± 19 |
| T180 | 106 ± 40 | 157 ± 21 * § | 95 ± 25 | |
| CI | T0 | 87.6 ± 29.6 | 69.4 ± 20.5 | 65.3 ± 16.7 |
| T180 | 45 ± 22.6 * | 95.8 ± 36.6 * ‡ | 65.1 ± 25.2 | |
| SVRI (dyn.s/cm5)/kg | T0 | 163.9 ± 96.2 | 166 ± 57 | 209.3 ± 91 |
| T180 | 108.1 ± 63.4 * | 76.2 ± 22.6 * | 201.8 ± 71.4 § | |
| IDO2 (mL/min/kg) | T0 | 13.4 ± 5.4 | 11 ± 2.8 | 9.1 ± 4.7 |
| T180 | 6.4 ± 3.6 * | 13.3 ± 4.2 * ‡ | 10 ± 4 | |
| IVO2 (mL/min/kg) | T0 | 6.2 ± 1.8 | 6.4 ± 1.3 | 5.7 ± 2.8 |
| T180 | 3.8 ± 1.5 * | 5.9 ± 2.2 | 5.3 ± 2.1 | |
| ERO2 (%) | T0 | 54.5 ± 10.2 | 58.6 ± 5.7 | 52.4 ± 13.4 |
| T180 | 65.2 ± 13.5 * | 44.5 ± 8.8 * ‡ | 54 ± 6 | |
| Lactate (mmoL/L) | T0 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 0.6 |
| T180 | 5.1 ± 2.4 * | 4.1 ± 2.7 * | 1.1 ± 0.3 § | |
| SvO2 (%) | T0 | 48.8 ± 8.4 | 41.7 ± 7.1 | 49 ± 13.2 |
| T180 | 34 ± 14.4 * | 55.4 ± 9.3 * ‡ | 46.6 ± 8.7 |
Values are mean ± SD. LPS, E. coli lipopolysaccharide; ERP, early resuscitation protocol; MAP, mean arterial pressure; CVP, central venous pressure; PAOP, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure; HR, heart rate; CI, cardiac index; SVRI, systemic vascular resistance index; IDO2, systemic oxygen delivery index; IVO2, systemic oxygen consumption index; ERO2, systemic oxygen extraction ratio; Lactate, arterial lactate; SvO2, mixed venous oxygen saturation. * p < .05 compared to baseline values; ‡p < .05 compared to LPS; §p < .05 compared to other groups.
Sublingual microcirculatory parameters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MVD (vessels/mm) | T0 | 31.1 ± 9.4 | 35.6 ± 9.5 | 24.7 ± 4.9 |
| T180 | 25.4 ± 6.8 | 23.1 ± 5.1 * | 28.3 ± 6 | |
| PVD (vessels/mm) | T0 | 28.9 ± 7.9 | 33.6 ± 10.4 | 23.8 ± 3.8 |
| T180 | 12.6 ± 8.7 * | 16.8 ± 7.2 * | 27.4 ± 5.5 § | |
| MFI | T0 | 2.7 ± 0.28 | 2.7 ± 0.22 | 2.6 ± 0.4 |
| T180 | 1.1 ± 0.6 * § | 2.3 ± 0.45 | 2.8 ± 0.25 | |
| HFI | T0 | 0.11 ± 0.07 | 0.16 ± 0.12 | 0.3 ± 0.25 |
| T180 | 1.1 ± 0.4 * § | 0.49 ± 0.25 * | 0.23 ± 0.16 | |
| PPV (%) | T0 | 93.6 ± 5.2 | 93.6 ± 6.2 | 92.4 ± 2.9 |
| T180 | 47.5 ± 24.6 * | 71.3 ± 27.8 | 96.9 ± 2.3 * ‡ |
Values are mean ± SD. LPS, E. coli lipopolysaccharide; ERP, early resuscitation protocol; MVD, microvascular density; PVD, perfused vascular density; MFI, microvascular flow index; HFI, heterogeneity flow index; PPV, proportion of perfused vessels (%). * p < .05 compared to baseline values; ‡p < .05 compared to LPS; §p < .05 compared to other groups.
Figure 2Correlation between MAP and MFI. The calculated inflection point of the biphasic relationship for MAP was 71 ± 6 mm Hg (R 2 = 0.63).