| Literature DB >> 26215428 |
Moyra Machado Portilho1, Marcia Leite Baptista2, Messias da Silva3, Paulo Sérgio Fonseca de Sousa1, Lia Laura Lewis-Ximenez1, Elisabeth Lampe1, Livia Melo Villar4.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of three in-house PCR techniques for HBV DNA detection and compare it with commercial quantitative methods to evaluate the usefulness of in-house methods for HBV diagnosis. Three panels of HBsAg reactive sera samples were evaluated: (i) 50 samples were examined using three methods for in-house qualitative PCR and the Cobas Amplicor HBV Monitor Assay; (ii) 87 samples were assayed using in-house semi-nested PCR and the Cobas TaqMan HBV test; (iii) 11 serial samples obtained from 2 HBV-infected individuals were assayed using the Cobas Amplicor HBV test and semi-nested PCR. In panel I, HBV DNA was detected in 44 samples using the Cobas Amplicor HBV test, 42 samples using semi-nested PCR (90% concordance with Cobas Amplicor), 22 samples using PCR for the core gene (63.6% concordance) and 29 samples using single-round PCR for the pre-S/S gene (75% concordance). In panel II, HBV DNA was quantified in 78 of the 87 HBsAg reactive samples using Cobas TaqMan but 52 samples using semi-nested PCR (67.8% concordance). HBV DNA was detected in serial samples until the 17th and 26th week after first donation using in-house semi-nested PCR and the Cobas Amplicor HBV test, respectively. In-house semi-nested PCR presented adequate concordance with commercial methods as an alternative method for HBV molecular diagnosis in low-resource settings.Entities:
Keywords: Commercial methods; HBV DNA; In-house PCR; Molecular diagnosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26215428 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.07.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Virol Methods ISSN: 0166-0934 Impact factor: 2.014