Literature DB >> 26215194

Negative Genetic Testing Does Not Deter Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Younger Patients with Greater Family Histories of Breast Cancer.

Frederick Wang1, Dominic Amara, Anne Warren Peled, Hani Sbitany, Robert D Foster, Cheryl A Ewing, Michael Alvarado, Laura J Esserman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) correlate with adoption of total skin-sparing mastectomy (TSSM). We aimed to characterize patients with unilateral breast cancer who underwent TSSM with CPM or without CPM (No CPM).
METHODS: We reviewed all patients with unilateral breast cancer who underwent TSSM from 2006 to 2013. Trends in CPM and genetic testing were evaluated across time. Patient characteristics and complications were compared between CPM and No CPM groups.
RESULTS: We identified 591 patients (293 No CPM and 298 CPM) with median follow-up of 25 (interquartile range [IQR] 13-52) months. All patients with deleterious mutations and 58% of those who tested negative for mutations underwent CPM. In patients who tested negative for mutations, CPM was correlated with younger patient age, greater family history, and younger age of relatives diagnosed with breast/ovarian cancer. CPM was associated with an increased risk of superficial nipple necrosis (relative risk [RR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-4.0), wound breakdown (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.04-2.5), and infections requiring oral antibiotics (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.16-2.2). In patients with tissue expander/implant reconstruction, CPM was associated with an increased risk of implant exposure (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.03-3.7) but did not affect the risk of implant loss (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.56-1.48).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who choose CPM fit the profile of patients with higher risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC), which may be due to polygenic risk factors that are currently under investigation. Physicians should address patients' fears of CBC, screening concerns, and the risk of complications when considering CPM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26215194     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4745-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  8 in total

1.  Psychosocial factors associated with the uptake of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among BRCA1/2 mutation noncarriers with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Margaux C Genoff; Melissa Salerno; Kimberly Amoroso; Sherry R Boyar; Margaret Sheehan; Megan Harlan Fleischut; Beth Siegel; Angela G Arnold; Erin E Salo-Mullen; Jennifer L Hay; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Rate of BRCA mutation in patients tested under NCCN genetic testing criteria.

Authors:  Anna C Beck; Haimiao Yuan; Junlin Liao; Pamela Imperiale; Krysten Shipley; Lillian M Erdahl; Sonia L Sugg; Ronald J Weigel; Ingrid M Lizarraga
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in genetically high risk newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Mara Tynan; Beth N Peshkin; Claudine Isaacs; Shawna Willey; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Rachel Nusbaum; Gillian Hooker; Suzanne C O'Neill; Lina Jandorf; Scott P Kelly; Jessica Heinzmann; Sarah Kelleher; Elizabeth Poggi; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Risk-reducing mastectomy for the prevention of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Nora E Carbine; Liz Lostumbo; Judi Wallace; Henry Ko
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-05

5.  Non-BRCA1/2 Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes: A New Frontier with Clinical Consequences for Plastic Surgeons.

Authors:  Jordan D Frey; Ara A Salibian; Freya R Schnabel; Mihye Choi; Nolan S Karp
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-11-20

6.  Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lene Nyhøj Heidemann; Gudjon L Gunnarsson; C Andrew Salzberg; Jens Ahm Sørensen; Jørn Bo Thomsen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-01-12

Review 7.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: current perspectives.

Authors:  Katharine Yao; Mark Sisco; Isabelle Bedrosian
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2016-06-22

8.  Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons' Knowledge and Comfort of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Survey of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; Rachel Bluebond-Langner; Carrie A Houssock; Sheri S Slezak; Emily Bellavance
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.