| Literature DB >> 26214806 |
Carl J Reddin1, Felipe Docmac2, Nessa E O'Connor3, John H Bothwell4, Chris Harrod5.
Abstract
Similar environmental driving forces can produce similarity among geographically distant ecosystems. Coastal oceanic upwelling, for example, has been associated with elevated biomass and abundance patterns of certain functional groups, e.g., corticated macroalgae. In the upwelling system of Northern Chile, we examined measures of intertidal macrobenthic composition, structure and trophic ecology across eighteen shores varying in their proximity to two coastal upwelling centres, in a hierarchical sampling design (spatial scales of >1 and >10 km). The influence of coastal upwelling on intertidal communities was confirmed by the stable isotope values (δEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26214806 PMCID: PMC4516361 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130789
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The anomalous warmth of Antofagasta Bay and upwelling context of the Mejillones Peninsula (arrow in map B) along the wider coastline of Northern Chile.
(A) Coastal primary productivity (chlorophyll a concentration, logarithmic colour scale) and (B) cool upwelled water (sea surface temperature, SST) parallel to the coastline. (C) A ‘zoomed-in’ view of the Mejillones Peninsula with SST (note different temperature scale to ‘B’) shows ‘locations’ (10 km scale, black lines), ‘sites’ (1 km scale, small black points) and the city of Antofagasta (black diamond). All SST and chlorophyll a concentrations are mean values from estimated daily aqua MODIS satellite data [36] collected between December 2011 and February 2012 at a scale of 4.6 km. Euclidean distance from most northern to most southern sites was approximately 83 km. Where mentioned in the text, sites are numbered from ‘1’ to ‘3’ from north to south, nested within each location.
Fig 2δ13C and δ15N isotopic composition (mean ± SD) of putative resources (open symbols) and consumers (closed symbols) along the coastline of Northern Chile.
D. kunthii was present only at Antofagasta Bay (locations 4 & 5); L nigrescens was absent from Antofagasta Bay (locations 4, 5); S. viridula was absent from Mejillones Bay (location 1).
Fig 3Geographical variation of standardised δ15N at sites along the coastline.
The solid line shows size-corrected P. purpuratus δ15N, whilst the dashed line shows the mean (± SD) across standardised δ15N of all consumers (P. purpuratus, E. peruviana, S. viridula, T. atra) and putative resources (POM, epilithic biofilm, Ulva sp.). Site labels are presented below the graph in sequence around the coast, with the main geographical features summarised at the base of the graph (see Fig 1 for more detail).
Fig 4The distribution of sites (symbols) and macroalgal species (crosses) over environmental gradients (arrows), showing the separation of Antofagasta Bay from Mejillones Peninsula.
A species-conditional triplot based on a canonical correspondence analysis, with P. purpuratus δ13C and δ15N included as environmental gradients. Eigenvalues of dimension 1 (horizontal) = 0.20 and dimension 2 (vertical) = 0.19; eigenvalue of the axis 3 (not displayed) = 0.09. Scale marks along the axes apply to the species and sites scores. Species crosses represent the weighted average of their ‘niche’ (by site), though labels were omitted to avoid cluttering the plot (listed in S2 Table). Rare species which occurred at <2 sites were removed a priori to analysis, as recommended by Bocard et al. [58]. Site symbols show Mejillones Peninsula (locations 2 & 3) and Bay (location 1) in black, and Antofagasta Bay (locations 4 & 5) and Coloso Point (location 6) in grey. 2D triplot displays 26.9% of total inertia (= weighted variance) in the observed occurrences and 65.3% of variance in the weighted averages and class totals of macroalgal species with respect to the environmental variables.
Local-scale correlations between consumer isotopic values (δ13C and δ15N), macroalgal richness components, and consumer diversity and abundance of the species.
| δ15N | Macroalgal richness | Green macroalgal richness | Brown macroalgal richness | Red macroalgal richness | Consumer Simpson’s | Local abundance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| δ13C | 0.20 | 0.39 | -0.30 | 0.25 | 0.19 | -0.30 | -0.20 |
| δ15NC | 1 | 0.19 | -0.12 | -0.34 | 0.42 | 0.27 | -0.74( |
|
| |||||||
| δ13CC | -0.02 | -0.05 | 0.28 | -0.04 | -0.10 | -0.22 | 0.13 |
| δ15NC (inverse) | 1 | 0.41 | 0.0 | 0.30 | 0.09 | -0.04 | -0.19 |
|
| |||||||
| δ13CC | 0.36 | 0.19 | -0.06 | -0.44 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.30 |
| δ15N | 1 | -0.16 | -0.23 | 0.06 | -0.01 | 0.02 | 0.65( |
|
| |||||||
| δ13C | -0.31 | 0.04 | -0.35 | 0.59( | -0.26 | -0.18 | 0.20 |
| δ15N | 1 | 0.20 | 0.56( | 0.03 | 0.11 | -0.17 | -0.14 |
Consumers A) P. purpuratus, B) E. peruviana, C) S. viridula and D) T. atra, and correlations are Pearson’s r, or Spearman’s r for green and brown richness and all local abundances. Superscript ‘c’ on the δ13C and δ15N denotes that the values have been corrected by size in attempt to remove putative ontogenetic shifts in trophic habits. Sites n = 18 for P. purpuratus and E. peruviana; n = 12 for S. viridula; n = 14 for T. atra. P-values shown as
*** P < 0.001,
*P < 0.05;
d.f. corrected by Dutilleul et al. [58] method; values in brackets are standard non-spatial tests.
The spatial separation of two distinct assemblages of dominant taxa.
| Putative trophic functional group | Grazer | Grazer | Suspension feeder | Suspension feeder | Suspension feeder | Predator | Grazer | Kelp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species (abundance of) |
|
|
|
| Barnacle % |
|
|
|
|
| -0.11 | -0.74( | -0.74( | -0.73( | -0.42 | 0.19 | 0.68( | 0.50( |
|
| — | 0.24 | 0.31 | -0.08 | -0.07 | -0.15 | 0.34 | -0.26 |
|
| — |
|
|
| -0.19 | -0.51( | -0.30 | |
|
| — |
|
| -0.41 | -0.48( | -0.54( | ||
|
| — |
| -0.31 | -0.71( | -0.59( | |||
| Barnacle % | — | -0.20 | -0.45 | -0.17 | ||||
|
| — |
|
| |||||
|
| — |
|
Spatial co-occurrence (positive correlations, bold) and separation (negative correlations) of taxa by abundance (n.b. presence/ absence for L. nigrescens), and taxa abundance associations with upwelling influence (a P. purpuratus δ15N). All correlations are Spearman’s Rank with non-spatial p-values shown in brackets as
*** P < 0.001,
** P < 0.01,
*P < 0.05.
For clarity, only one half of the symmetrical correlation matrix has been included.
Spatial differences in abundance of dominant taxa between the outer Mejillones Peninsula (b locations 2 and 3) and Antofagasta Bay (c locations 4 and 5).
| Mean abundance (ind. m-2) ± SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Outer peninsulab | Inner bayc | t-test P value | |
|
| 0.04 ± 0.05 | 9.90 ± 17.02 | ns |
|
| 10.94 ± 3.18 |
| ( |
|
| 0.17 ± 0.3 |
| ( |
|
| 0 ± 0 |
| ns |
| Barnacle % | 9.22 ± 8.33 |
| ns |
|
|
| 0.13 ± 0.13 | ( |
|
|
| 0.05 ± 0.1 | ns |
|
|
| 0/6 | - |
P-values derived from a non-spatial two-tailed t-test,
** P < 0.01,
*P < 0.05,
ns = not significant. Proportion of sites present at, for L. nigrescens.
Fig 5The geographical switching in importance of POM and brown macroalgae to the diets of intertidal consumers.
Dietary contributions by resources to (A) the mussel P. purpuratus and (B) grazer species together, estimated by SIAR mixing models run separately for Mejillones Peninsula and Bay (locations 1–3), and Antofagasta Bay with Coloso Point (locations 4–6). Plotted are the 95, 75 and 50% Bayesian credibility intervals, with significance of differences between peninsula and bay estimates. ‘Brown macroalgae’ represents L. nigrescens and D. kunthii, which were combined due to isotopic similarity (Fig 2). The food webs of (C) Antofagasta Bay and (D) Mejillones Peninsula plotted figuratively. Arrow weight represents dietary importance by SIAR proportion estimates (mode).