Michael K Gould1, Tania Tang1, In-Lu Amy Liu1, Janet Lee1, Chengyi Zheng1, Kim N Danforth1, Anne E Kosco2, Jamie L Di Fiore3, David E Suh4. 1. 1 Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California. 2. 2 Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. 3. 3 Kaiser Permanente Baldwin Park Medical Center, Baldwin Park, California; and. 4. 4 Kaiser Permanente West Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Pulmonary nodules are common incidental findings, but information about their incidence in the era of computed tomography (CT) is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To examine recent trends in pulmonary nodule identification. METHODS: We used electronic health records and natural language processing to identify members of an integrated health system who had nodules measuring 4 to 30 mm. We calculated rates of chest CT imaging, nodule identification, and receipt of a new lung cancer diagnosis within 2 years of nodule identification, and standardized rates by age and sex to estimate the frequency of nodule identification in the U.S. population in 2010. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2012, more than 200,000 adult members underwent 415,581 chest CT examinations. The annual frequency of chest CT imaging increased from 1.3 to 1.9% for all adult members, whereas the frequency of nodule identification increased from 24 to 31% for all scans performed. The annual rate of chest CT increased from 15.4 to 20.7 per 1,000 person-years, and the rate of nodule identification increased from 3.9 to 6.6 per 1,000 person-years, whereas the rate of a new lung cancer diagnosis remained stable. By extrapolation, more than 4.8 million Americans underwent at least one chest CT scan and 1.57 million had a nodule identified, including 63,000 who received a new lung cancer diagnosis within 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental pulmonary nodules are an increasingly common consequence of routine medical care, with an incidence that is much greater than recognized previously. More frequent nodule identification has not been accompanied by increases in the diagnosis of cancerous nodules.
RATIONALE: Pulmonary nodules are common incidental findings, but information about their incidence in the era of computed tomography (CT) is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To examine recent trends in pulmonary nodule identification. METHODS: We used electronic health records and natural language processing to identify members of an integrated health system who had nodules measuring 4 to 30 mm. We calculated rates of chest CT imaging, nodule identification, and receipt of a new lung cancer diagnosis within 2 years of nodule identification, and standardized rates by age and sex to estimate the frequency of nodule identification in the U.S. population in 2010. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2012, more than 200,000 adult members underwent 415,581 chest CT examinations. The annual frequency of chest CT imaging increased from 1.3 to 1.9% for all adult members, whereas the frequency of nodule identification increased from 24 to 31% for all scans performed. The annual rate of chest CT increased from 15.4 to 20.7 per 1,000 person-years, and the rate of nodule identification increased from 3.9 to 6.6 per 1,000 person-years, whereas the rate of a new lung cancer diagnosis remained stable. By extrapolation, more than 4.8 million Americans underwent at least one chest CT scan and 1.57 million had a nodule identified, including 63,000 who received a new lung cancer diagnosis within 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental pulmonary nodules are an increasingly common consequence of routine medical care, with an incidence that is much greater than recognized previously. More frequent nodule identification has not been accompanied by increases in the diagnosis of cancerous nodules.
Entities:
Keywords:
coin lesion; computed tomography; lung cancer
Authors: Thomas J Roberts; Inga T Lennes; Saif Hawari; Lecia V Sequist; Elyse R Park; Henning Willers; Angela Frank; Henning Gaissert; Jo-Anne Shepard; David Ryan Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-12-26
Authors: Wassim W Labaki; Carlos H Martinez; Fernando J Martinez; Craig J Galbán; Brian D Ross; George R Washko; R Graham Barr; Elizabeth A Regan; Harvey O Coxson; Eric A Hoffman; John D Newell; Douglas Curran-Everett; James C Hogg; James D Crapo; David A Lynch; Ella A Kazerooni; MeiLan K Han Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Lucas W Thornblade; Michael S Mulligan; Katherine Odem-Davis; Billanna Hwang; Rachel L Waworuntu; Erika M Wolff; Larry Kessler; Douglas E Wood; Farhood Farjah Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Nichole T Tanner; Lonny Yarmus; Alexander Chen; Jessica Wang Memoli; Hiren J Mehta; Nicholas J Pastis; Hans Lee; Michael A Jantz; Paul J Nietert; Gerard A Silvestri Journal: Chest Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Amelia W Maiga; Stephen A Deppen; Sarah Fletcher Mercaldo; Jeffrey D Blume; Chandler Montgomery; Laszlo T Vaszar; Christina Williamson; James M Isbell; Otis B Rickman; Rhonda Pinkerman; Eric S Lambright; Jonathan C Nesbitt; Eric L Grogan Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 14.766