Literature DB >> 26214163

Perspective-taking in comprehension, production, and memory: An individual differences approach.

Rachel A Ryskin1, Aaron S Benjamin1, Jonathan Tullis2, Sarah Brown-Schmidt1.   

Abstract

The ability to take a different perspective is central to a tremendous variety of higher level cognitive skills. To communicate effectively, we must adopt the perspective of another person both while speaking and listening. To ensure the successful retrieval of critical information in the future, we must adopt the perspective of our own future self and construct cues that will survive the passage of time. Here we explore the cognitive underpinnings of perspective-taking across a set of tasks that involve communication and memory, with an eye toward evaluating the proposal that perspective-taking is domain-general (e.g., Wardlow, 2013). We measured participants' perspective-taking ability in a language production task, a language comprehension task, and a memory task in which people generated their own cues for the future. Surprisingly, there was little variance common to the 3 tasks, a result that suggests that perspective-taking is not domain-general. Performance in the language production task was predicted by a measure of working memory, whereas performance in the cue-generation memory task was predicted by a combination of working memory and long-term memory measures. These results indicate that perspective-taking relies on differing cognitive capacities in different situations. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26214163     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  12 in total

1.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?

Authors:  Ariel N James; Scott H Fraundorf; Eun-Kyung Lee; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Predicting others' knowledge: Knowledge estimation as cue utilization.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-11

3.  Memory and Common Ground Processes in Language Use.

Authors:  Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Melissa C Duff
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-10-31

4.  Tracking Colisteners' Knowledge States During Language Comprehension.

Authors:  Olessia Jouravlev; Rachael Schwartz; Dima Ayyash; Zachary Mineroff; Edward Gibson; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-11-16

5.  Autoregressive Generalized Linear Mixed Effect Models with Crossed Random Effects: An Application to Intensive Binary Time Series Eye-Tracking Data.

Authors:  Sun-Joo Cho; Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Woo-Yeol Lee
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 6.  The Seven Selves of Dementia.

Authors:  Iris Bomilcar; Elodie Bertrand; Robin G Morris; Daniel C Mograbi
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 7.  Metacognition and Perspective-Taking in Alzheimer's Disease: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Elodie Bertrand; Jesus Landeira-Fernandez; Daniel C Mograbi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-17

8.  Spontaneous adaptation explains why people act faster when being imitated.

Authors:  Jarosław R Lelonkiewicz; Chiara Gambi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

9.  Does interference between self and other perspectives in theory of mind tasks reflect a common underlying process? Evidence from individual differences in theory of mind and inhibitory control.

Authors:  Adam W Qureshi; Rebecca L Monk; Dana Samson; Ian A Apperly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-02

10.  Why does peer instruction benefit student learning?

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.