| Literature DB >> 26213930 |
Yong Pan1, Ning Mu2, Shengyu Shao3, Liu Yang4, Wen Wang5, Xiao Xie6, Shitang He7.
Abstract
Self-assembly and molecular imprinting technologies are very attractive technologies for the development of artificial recognition systems and provide chemical recognition based on need and not happenstance. In this paper, we employed a b-cyclodextrin derivative surface acoustic wave (SAW) chemical sensor for detecting the chemical warfare agents (CWAs) sarin (O-Isoprophyl methylphosphonofluoridate, GB). Using sarin acid (isoprophyl hydrogen methylphosphonate) as an imprinting template, mono[6-deoxy-6-[(mercaptodecamethylene)thio]]-β-cyclodextrin was prepared by self-assembled method on one of the SAW oscillators. After templates' removal, a sensitive and selective molecular imprinting (MIP) monolayer for GB was prepared. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and atomic force microscope (AFM) were used to characterize this film. Comparing the detection results to GB by MIP film and non-MIP film, the molecularly imprinting effect was also proved. The resulting SAW sensor could detect sarin as low as 0.10 mg/m3 at room temperature and the frequency shift was about 300 Hz. The response frequency increased linearly with increasing sarin concentration in the range of 0.7 mg/m3~3.0 mg/m3. When sarin was detected under different temperatures, the SAW sensor exhibited outstanding sensitivity and reliability.Entities:
Keywords: b-cyclodextrin; detection; molecular imprinting (MIP); self-assembly; surface acoustic wave (SAW)
Year: 2015 PMID: 26213930 PMCID: PMC4570299 DOI: 10.3390/s150817916
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Chemical structure of β-cyclodextrin.
Figure 2The oscillator circuit configuration.
Figure 3Atomic force microscope (AFM) two-dimensional and three-dimensional photographs of the surface acoustic wave (SAW) Au surface. (a) Bare Au film; (b) After the self-assembly procedure.
Figure 4Electrochemical impedance spectra (a) Nyquist; (b) Bode Phase.
Figure 5Confirmation of MIP effect (a) Detection of GB by three kinds of sensors; (b) Detection of different warfare agents by MIP sensor.
Responses of the SAW-MIP sensor to different concentrations of GB (Temperature = 25 °C, Relative Humidity = 45%).
| Concentration (mg/m3) | Frequency Shifts (Hz) | Response Time (s) | Recovery Time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 293 | 307 | 45 |
| 0.3 | 430 | 260 | 55 |
| 0.7 | 730 | 220 | 70 |
| 1.0 | 790 | 200 | 81 |
| 1.5 | 925 | 180 | 95 |
| 2.0 | 1020 | 159 | 103 |
| 2.5 | 1150 | 148 | 115 |
| 3.0 | 1300 | 140 | 130 |
Detection results of the SAW-MIP sensor to GB under different temperatures.
| Temperature (ºC) | Frequency Shift (Hz) | Response Time (s) | Recovery Time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 2503 | 210 | 90 |
| 20 | 2127 | 180 | 85 |
| 30 | 1438 | 120 | 60 |
| 40 | 1024 | 90 | 30 |
| 50 | 837 | 60 | 10 |
Figure 6Stability of the sensor after storage for several days.