Literature DB >> 26212460

The outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome in relation to body mass index and diabetes mellitus.

Ayman O Soubani1, Wei Chen2, Hyejeong Jang2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the 28 day mortality of patients with ARDS in relation to body mass index (BMI) and presence diabetes mellitus (DM).
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of patients enrolled in the ARDS Network randomized controlled trials.
RESULTS: 2914 patients were enrolled in these trials. 112 patients were underweight (BMI < 18.5), 948 patients were normal range (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25.0), 801 patients were overweight (25.0 ≤ BMI < 30.0), 687 patients were obese (30.0 ≤ BMI < 40.0), and 175 patients were severely obese (BMI ≥ 40.0). 469 patients had DM. There was no significant difference in the 28 day mortality in relation to BMI or presence of DM (underweight adjusted OR, 1.217; 95% CI, 0.749-1.979; overweight adjusted OR, 0.887; 95% CI, 0.696-1.131; obese adjusted OR, 0.812; 95% CI, 0.624-1.056; severely obese adjusted OR, 1.102; 95% CI, 0.716-1.695; and DM adjusted OR, 0.938; 95% CI, 0.728-1.208).
CONCLUSIONS: The short term mortality in patients with ARDS is not affected by BMI or the presence of DM.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARDS; BMI; Diabetes mellitus; Obesity; Outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26212460     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung        ISSN: 0147-9563            Impact factor:   2.210


  10 in total

1.  Effect of ARDS Severity and Etiology on Short-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Haitham El-Haddad; Hyejeong Jang; Wei Chen; Ayman O Soubani
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.258

2.  The authors reply.

Authors:  Shan L Ward; Heidi Flori
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Clinical Predictors of Hospital Mortality Differ Between Direct and Indirect ARDS.

Authors:  Liang Luo; Ciara M Shaver; Zhiguo Zhao; Tatsuki Koyama; Carolyn S Calfee; Julie A Bastarache; Lorraine B Ware
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  The effect of demographics and patient location on the outcome of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Haitham El-Haddad; Hyejeong Jang; Wei Chen; Samran Haider; Ayman O Soubani
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.219

5.  Obesity and survival in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a paradox within the paradox.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ball; Ary Serpa Neto; Paolo Pelosi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  The effect of diabetes on the risk and mortality of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mingxia Ji; Mengyan Chen; Xiaofei Hong; Tiejiang Chen; Ning Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Association Between Obesity and Short-And Long-Term Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Based on the Berlin Definition.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Yadan Wang; Weijie Li; Jun Wang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  Outcomes of Herpes Simplex Virus Pneumonitis in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Wen-Jui Chang; Hsin-Yao Wang; Yu-Chen Huang; Chun-Yu Lin; Shaw-Woei Leu; Meng-Jer Hsieh; Chung-Chi Huang
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  "Obesity Paradox" in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Asystematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Guo Zhi; Wang Xin; Wang Ying; Xing Guohong; Liu Shuying
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Diabetes and Mortality From Respiratory Diseases: The Japan Collaborative Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mengying Wang; Isao Muraki; Keyang Liu; Kokoro Shirai; Akiko Tamakoshi; Yonghua Hu; Hiroyasu Iso
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.211

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.