Literature DB >> 26212295

JaCVAM-organized international validation study of the in vivo rodent alkaline comet assay for detection of genotoxic carcinogens: II. Summary of definitive validation study results.

Yoshifumi Uno1, Hajime Kojima2, Takashi Omori3, Raffaella Corvi4, Masamistu Honma2, Leonard M Schechtman5, Raymond R Tice6, Carol Beevers7, Marlies De Boeck8, Brian Burlinson9, Cheryl A Hobbs10, Sachiko Kitamoto11, Andrew R Kraynak12, James McNamee13, Yuzuki Nakagawa14, Kamala Pant15, Ulla Plappert-Helbig16, Catherine Priestley17, Hironao Takasawa18, Kunio Wada19, Uta Wirnitzer20, Norihide Asano21, Patricia A Escobar22, David Lovell23, Takeshi Morita2, Madoka Nakajima24, Yasuo Ohno2, Makoto Hayashi25.   

Abstract

The in vivo rodent alkaline comet assay (comet assay) is used internationally to investigate the in vivo genotoxic potential of test chemicals. This assay, however, has not previously been formally validated. The Japanese Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods (JaCVAM), with the cooperation of the U.S. NTP Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM)/the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM), the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM), and the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society/Mammalian Mutagenesis Study Group (JEMS/MMS), organized an international validation study to evaluate the reliability and relevance of the assay for identifying genotoxic carcinogens, using liver and stomach as target organs. The ultimate goal of this exercise was to establish an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guideline. The study protocol was optimized in the pre-validation studies, and then the definitive (4th phase) validation study was conducted in two steps. In the 1st step, assay reproducibility was confirmed among laboratories using four coded reference chemicals and the positive control ethyl methanesulfonate. In the 2nd step, the predictive capability was investigated using 40 coded chemicals with known genotoxic and carcinogenic activity (i.e., genotoxic carcinogens, genotoxic non-carcinogens, non-genotoxic carcinogens, and non-genotoxic non-carcinogens). Based on the results obtained, the in vivo comet assay is concluded to be highly capable of identifying genotoxic chemicals and therefore can serve as a reliable predictor of rodent carcinogenicity.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comet assay; Genotoxicity; In vivo; JaCVAM; Rodent; Validation study

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26212295     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen        ISSN: 1383-5718            Impact factor:   2.873


  11 in total

1.  A comparison of transgenic rodent mutation and in vivo comet assay responses for 91 chemicals.

Authors:  David Kirkland; Dan D Levy; Matthew J LeBaron; Marilyn J Aardema; Carol Beevers; Javed Bhalli; George R Douglas; Patricia A Escobar; Christopher S Farabaugh; Melanie Guerard; George E Johnson; Rohan Kulkarni; Frank Le Curieux; Alexandra S Long; Jasmin Lott; David P Lovell; Mirjam Luijten; Francesco Marchetti; John J Nicolette; Stefan Pfuhler; Daniel J Roberts; Leon F Stankowski; Veronique Thybaud; Sandy K Weiner; Andrew Williams; Kristine L Witt; Robert Young
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 2.873

2.  Glibenclamide protects against thioacetamide-induced hepatic damage in Wistar rat: investigation on NLRP3, MMP-2, and stellate cell activation.

Authors:  Durgesh Kumar Dwivedi; G B Jena
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Antioxidative defense against omeprazole-induced toxicogenetical effects in Swiss mice.

Authors:  Antonio Lima Braga; Patrícia Bastos do Nascimento; Márcia Fernanda Correia Jardim Paz; Rosália Maria Tôrres de Lima; José Victor de Oliveira Santos; Marcus Vinícius Oliveira Barros de Alencar; Ag-Anne Pereira Melo de Meneses; Antonio Luiz Gomes Júnior; Muhammad Torequl Islam; João Marcelo de Castro E Sousa; Ana Amélia de Carvalho Melo-Cavalcante
Journal:  Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.024

4.  Antigenotoxic Effect of Ascorbic Acid and Resveratrol in Erythrocytes of Ambystoma mexicanum, Oreochromis niloticus and Human Lymphocytes Exposed to Glyphosate.

Authors:  Carlos Alvarez-Moya; Alexis Gerardo Sámano-León; Mónica Reynoso-Silva; Rafael Ramírez-Velasco; Mario Alberto Ruiz-López; Alma Rosa Villalobos-Arámbula
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 2.976

5.  Comet assay evaluation of six chemicals of known genotoxic potential in rats.

Authors:  Cheryl A Hobbs; Leslie Recio; Michael Streicker; Molly H Boyle; Jin Tanaka; Atsushi Shiga; Kristine L Witt
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.873

Review 6.  Comet assay: a versatile but complex tool in genotoxicity testing.

Authors:  Eugenia Cordelli; Margherita Bignami; Francesca Pacchierotti
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.524

7.  The application of the comet assay to assess the genotoxicity of environmental pollutants in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Soudabeh Imanikia; Francesca Galea; Eszter Nagy; David H Phillips; Stephen R Stürzenbaum; Volker M Arlt
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.860

Review 8.  Advantages of evaluating γH2AX induction in non-clinical drug development.

Authors:  Shigeki Motoyama; Akira Takeiri; Kenji Tanaka; Asako Harada; Kaori Matsuzaki; Junko Taketo; Saori Matsuo; Etsuko Fujii; Masayuki Mishima
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2018-05-14

Review 9.  Role of pathology peer review in interpretation of the comet assay.

Authors:  Robert R Maronpot; Cheryl A Hobbs; Shim-Mo Hayashi
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 1.628

10.  Assessment of cellular and molecular metrics for dose selection in an in vivo comet assay: A case study with MDI.

Authors:  Zhiying Ji; Matthew W Koehler; Andrew B Scott; Matthew J LeBaron
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.579

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.