Literature DB >> 26212114

Breath testing as potential colorectal cancer screening tool.

Haitham Amal1, Marcis Leja2,3,4, Konrads Funka2,3,4, Ieva Lasina2, Roberts Skapars2,3, Armands Sivins2,3, Guntis Ancans2,3, Ilze Kikuste2,4, Aigars Vanags4, Ivars Tolmanis4, Arnis Kirsners2, Limas Kupcinskas5, Hossam Haick1.   

Abstract

Although colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is included in organized programs of many countries worldwide, there is still a place for better screening tools. In this study, 418 breath samples were collected from 65 patients with CRC, 22 with advanced or nonadvanced adenomas, and 122 control cases. All patients, including the controls, had undergone colonoscopy. The samples were analysed with two different techniques. The first technique relied on gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for identification and quantification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The T-test was used to identify significant VOCs (p values < 0.017). The second technique relied on sensor analysis with a pattern recognition method for building a breath pattern to identify different groups. Blind analysis or leave-one-out cross validation was conducted for validation. The GC-MS analysis revealed four significant VOCs that identified the tested groups; these were acetone and ethyl acetate (higher in CRC), ethanol and 4-methyl octane (lower in CRC). The sensor-analysis distinguished CRC from the control group with 85% sensitivity, 94% specificity and 91% accuracy. The performance of the sensors in identifying the advanced adenoma group from the non-advanced adenomas was 88% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 94% accuracy. The performance of the sensors in identifying the advanced adenoma group was distinguished from the control group was 100% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 94% accuracy. For summary, volatile marker testing by using sensor analysis is a promising noninvasive approach for CRC screening.
© 2015 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breath; colorectal cancer; diagnosis; sensor; spectrometry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26212114     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  33 in total

Review 1.  2017 Emily Couric Memorial Lecture: Colorectal Cancer: Polyps, Prevention, and Progress.

Authors:  Mark B Pochapin
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  The use of the PEN3 e-nose in the screening of colorectal cancer and polyps.

Authors:  D F Altomare; F Porcelli; A Picciariello; M Pinto; M Di Lena; O Caputi Iambrenghi; I Ugenti; A Guglielmi; L Vincenti; G De Gennaro
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Fabricating and printing chemiresistors based on monolayer-capped metal nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yana Milyutin; Manal Abud-Hawa; Viki Kloper-Weidenfeld; Elias Mansour; Yoav Y Broza; Gidi Shani; Hossam Haick
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Analysis of volatile organic compounds from deep airway in the lung through intubation sampling.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Jin Zhang; Houwen Ding; Yueting Ding; Xue Zou; Min Yang; Qiang Zhou; Zhou Liu; Ling Zheng; Heping Zuo; Dianlong Ge; Qiangling Zhang; Chaoqun Huang; Chengyin Shen; Yannan Chu
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.478

5.  Diagnostic Performance of Electronic Noses in Cancer Diagnoses Using Exhaled Breath: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Max H M C Scheepers; Zaid Al-Difaie; Lloyd Brandts; Andrea Peeters; Bart van Grinsven; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

6.  Accuracy and Methodologic Challenges of Volatile Organic Compound-Based Exhaled Breath Tests for Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  George B Hanna; Piers R Boshier; Sheraz R Markar; Andrea Romano
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Diagnosis and Classification of 17 Diseases from 1404 Subjects via Pattern Analysis of Exhaled Molecules.

Authors:  Morad K Nakhleh; Haitham Amal; Raneen Jeries; Yoav Y Broza; Manal Aboud; Alaa Gharra; Hodaya Ivgi; Salam Khatib; Shifaa Badarneh; Lior Har-Shai; Lea Glass-Marmor; Izabella Lejbkowicz; Ariel Miller; Samih Badarny; Raz Winer; John Finberg; Sylvia Cohen-Kaminsky; Frédéric Perros; David Montani; Barbara Girerd; Gilles Garcia; Gérald Simonneau; Farid Nakhoul; Shira Baram; Raed Salim; Marwan Hakim; Maayan Gruber; Ohad Ronen; Tal Marshak; Ilana Doweck; Ofer Nativ; Zaher Bahouth; Da-You Shi; Wei Zhang; Qing-Ling Hua; Yue-Yin Pan; Li Tao; Hu Liu; Amir Karban; Eduard Koifman; Tova Rainis; Roberts Skapars; Armands Sivins; Guntis Ancans; Inta Liepniece-Karele; Ilze Kikuste; Ieva Lasina; Ivars Tolmanis; Douglas Johnson; Stuart Z Millstone; Jennifer Fulton; John W Wells; Larry H Wilf; Marc Humbert; Marcis Leja; Nir Peled; Hossam Haick
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 15.881

8.  Feasibility of electronic nose technology for discriminating between head and neck, bladder, and colon carcinomas.

Authors:  R M G E van de Goor; N Leunis; M R A van Hooren; E Francisca; A Masclee; B Kremer; K W Kross
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  Are Volatile Organic Compounds Accurate Markers in the Assessment of Colorectal Cancer and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases? A Review.

Authors:  Filippo Vernia; Marco Valvano; Stefano Fabiani; Gianpiero Stefanelli; Salvatore Longo; Angelo Viscido; Giovanni Latella
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Electronic Noses for Well-Being: Breath Analysis and Energy Expenditure.

Authors:  Julian W Gardner; Timothy A Vincent
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.