Anna M Kucharska-Newton1, Gerardo Heiss2, Hanyu Ni3, Sally C Stearns4, Nicole Puccinelli-Ortega5, Lisa M Wruck6, Lloyd Chambless6. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: anna_newton@unc.edu. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. 4. Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 5. Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 6. Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We examined the accuracy of Medicare heart failure (HF) diagnostic codes in the identification of acute decompensated (ADHF and chronic stable (CSHF) HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hospitalizations were identified from medical discharge records for Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study participants with linked Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR) files for the years 2005-2009. The ARIC study classification of ADHF and CSHF, based on adjudicated review of medical records, was considered to be the criterion standard. A total 8,239 ARIC medical records and MedPAR records meeting fee-for-service (FFS) criteria matched on unique participant ID and date of discharge (68.5% match). Agreement between HF diagnostic codes from the 2 data sources found in the matched records for codes in any position (κ > 0.9) was attenuated for primary diagnostic codes (κ < 0.8). Sensitivity of HF diagnostic codes found in Medicare claims in the identification of ADHF and CSHF was low, especially for the primary diagnostic codes. CONCLUSION: Matching of hospitalizations from Medicare claims with those obtained from abstracted medical records is incomplete, even for hospitalizations meeting FFS criteria. Within matched records, HF diagnostic codes from Medicare show excellent agreement with HF diagnostic codes obtained from medical record abstraction. The Medicare data may, however, overestimate the occurrence of hospitalized ADHF or CSHF.
BACKGROUND: We examined the accuracy of Medicare heart failure (HF) diagnostic codes in the identification of acute decompensated (ADHF and chronic stable (CSHF) HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hospitalizations were identified from medical discharge records for Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study participants with linked Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR) files for the years 2005-2009. The ARIC study classification of ADHF and CSHF, based on adjudicated review of medical records, was considered to be the criterion standard. A total 8,239 ARIC medical records and MedPAR records meeting fee-for-service (FFS) criteria matched on unique participant ID and date of discharge (68.5% match). Agreement between HF diagnostic codes from the 2 data sources found in the matched records for codes in any position (κ > 0.9) was attenuated for primary diagnostic codes (κ < 0.8). Sensitivity of HF diagnostic codes found in Medicare claims in the identification of ADHF and CSHF was low, especially for the primary diagnostic codes. CONCLUSION: Matching of hospitalizations from Medicare claims with those obtained from abstracted medical records is incomplete, even for hospitalizations meeting FFS criteria. Within matched records, HF diagnostic codes from Medicare show excellent agreement with HF diagnostic codes obtained from medical record abstraction. The Medicare data may, however, overestimate the occurrence of hospitalized ADHF or CSHF.
Authors: Jane S Saczynski; Susan E Andrade; Leslie R Harrold; Jennifer Tjia; Sarah L Cutrona; Katherine S Dodd; Robert J Goldberg; Jerry H Gurwitz Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Wayne D Rosamond; Patricia P Chang; Chris Baggett; Anna Johnson; Alain G Bertoni; Eyal Shahar; Anita Deswal; Gerardo Heiss; Lloyd E Chambless Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2012-01-23 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Thomas S Rector; Steven L Wickstrom; Mona Shah; N Thomas Greeenlee; Paula Rheault; Jeannette Rogowski; Vicki Freedman; John Adams; José J Escarce Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Emily L Johnson; Gregory L Krauss; Keenan A Walker; Jason Brandt; Anna Kucharska-Newton; Thomas H Mosley; Sevil Yasar; Rebecca F Gottesman Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Carmen C Cuthbertson; Anna Kucharska-Newton; Keturah R Faurot; Til Stürmer; Michele Jonsson Funk; Priya Palta; B Gwen Windham; Sydney Thai; Jennifer L Lund Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Mugdha Gokhale; John B Buse; Michele Jonsson Funk; Jennifer Lund; Virginia Pate; Ross J Simpson; Til Stürmer Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: Alexander E Merkler; Monica L Chen; Neal S Parikh; Santosh B Murthy; Shadi Yaghi; Parag Goyal; Peter M Okin; Maria G Karas; Babak B Navi; Costantino Iadecola; Hooman Kamel Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Anna M Kucharska-Newton; Priya Palta; Sheila Burgard; Michael E Griswold; Jennifer L Lund; Benjamin D Capistrant; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Karen Bandeen-Roche; B Gwen Windham Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Rohan Khera; Ambarish Pandey; Colby R Ayers; Vijay Agusala; Sandi L Pruitt; Ethan A Halm; Mark H Drazner; Sandeep R Das; James A de Lemos; Jarett D Berry Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Ricky Camplain; Anna Kucharska-Newton; Thomas C Keyserling; J Bradley Layton; Laura Loehr; Gerardo Heiss Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Emily L Johnson; Gregory L Krauss; Alexandra K Lee; Andrea L C Schneider; Jennifer L Dearborn; Anna M Kucharska-Newton; Juebin Huang; Alvaro Alonso; Rebecca F Gottesman Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 18.302