O'Sam Shibeeb1,2, Glyn Chidlow1,2, Guoge Han1,2, John P M Wood1,2, Robert J Casson1,2. 1. Ophthalmic Research Laboratories, South Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, Centre for Neurological Diseases, Hanson Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 2. University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the effect of subconjunctival glucose on the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in experimental retinal ischaemia and contrast sensitivity in humans with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: First, we measured the intravitreal concentration of glucose at various time points after a subconjunctival injection of 100 μl of 50% glucose to Sprague-Dawley rats. Next, treatment and control groups received 50% subconjunctival glucose and iso-osmotic (8%) saline, respectively, 1 h prior to a unilateral ischaemic retinal injury; 7 days later, the damage profiles were compared using RGC and axon counts. Subsequently, we conducted a double-blind, crossover, pilot clinical study in seven eyes of five pseudophakic subjects with severe POAG. Subjects received either 0.3 mL of 50% glucose subconjunctivally or iso-osmotic (8%) saline, then vice versa after a 2-3 week 'wash-out' period; change in contrast sensitivity from baseline was the primary outcome. RESULTS:Subconjunctival glucose preserved approximately 60% of Brn3a-positive RGCs in all retinal zones compared with an 80% loss in control retinas, and rescued approximately 40% of the axonal loss. In the human trial, the contrast sensitivity at 12 cycles/degree was 0.24 log units greater than baseline (95% confidence interval 0.12-0.36; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Subconjunctival glucose partially protects RGC somata and axons against an ischaemic insult and temporarily recovers contrast sensitivity in patients with severe POAG. Although an unlikely therapeutic strategy for POAG, the findings motivate further bioenergetic-based research in glaucoma and other optic nerve and retinal diseases, where energy failure may be part of the pathogenesis.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the effect of subconjunctival glucose on the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in experimental retinal ischaemia and contrast sensitivity in humans with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: First, we measured the intravitreal concentration of glucose at various time points after a subconjunctival injection of 100 μl of 50% glucose to Sprague-Dawley rats. Next, treatment and control groups received 50% subconjunctival glucose and iso-osmotic (8%) saline, respectively, 1 h prior to a unilateral ischaemic retinal injury; 7 days later, the damage profiles were compared using RGC and axon counts. Subsequently, we conducted a double-blind, crossover, pilot clinical study in seven eyes of five pseudophakic subjects with severe POAG. Subjects received either 0.3 mL of 50% glucose subconjunctivally or iso-osmotic (8%) saline, then vice versa after a 2-3 week 'wash-out' period; change in contrast sensitivity from baseline was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Subconjunctival glucose preserved approximately 60% of Brn3a-positive RGCs in all retinal zones compared with an 80% loss in control retinas, and rescued approximately 40% of the axonal loss. In the human trial, the contrast sensitivity at 12 cycles/degree was 0.24 log units greater than baseline (95% confidence interval 0.12-0.36; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Subconjunctival glucose partially protects RGC somata and axons against an ischaemic insult and temporarily recovers contrast sensitivity in patients with severe POAG. Although an unlikely therapeutic strategy for POAG, the findings motivate further bioenergetic-based research in glaucoma and other optic nerve and retinal diseases, where energy failure may be part of the pathogenesis.
Authors: J G Crowston; E T Fahy; L Fry; I A Trounce; P van Wijngaarden; S Petrou; V Chrysostomou Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: James R Tribble; Flora Hui; Melissa Jöe; Katharina Bell; Vicki Chrysostomou; Jonathan G Crowston; Pete A Williams Journal: Cells Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 6.600
Authors: Sean M Silverman; Byung-Jin Kim; Garreth R Howell; Joselyn Miller; Simon W M John; Robert J Wordinger; Abbot F Clark Journal: Mol Neurodegener Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 14.195