Literature DB >> 26211420

Animal Models of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma-Past, Present, and Future.

Harit Kapoor1, Kush Raj Lohani1, Tommy H Lee1, Devendra K Agrawal1, Sumeet K Mittal1.   

Abstract

Esophageal adenocarcinoma is the fastest rising cancer in the United States. It develops from long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease which affects >20% of the general population. It carries a very poor prognosis with 5-year survival <20%. The disease is known to sequentially progress from reflux esophagitis to a metaplastic precursor, Barrett's esophagus and then onto dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, only few patients with reflux develop Barrett's esophagus and only a minority of these turn malignant. The reason for this heterogeneity in clinical progression is unknown. To improve patient management, molecular changes which facilitate disease progression must be identified. Animal models can provide a comprehensive functional and anatomic platform for such a study. Rats and mice have been the most widely studied but disease homology with humans has been questioned. No animal model naturally simulates the inflammation to adenocarcinoma progression as in humans, with all models requiring surgical bypass or destruction of existing antireflux mechanisms. Valuable properties of individual models could be utilized to holistically evaluate disease progression. In this review paper, we critically examined the current animal models of Barrett's esophagus, their differences and homologies with human disease and how they have shaped our current understanding of Barrett's carcinogenesis.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett's esophagus; animal models; esophageal adenocarcinoma; genetic model; surgical model

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26211420      PMCID: PMC4703452          DOI: 10.1111/cts.12304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Sci        ISSN: 1752-8054            Impact factor:   4.689


  71 in total

1.  American and Japanese rats of the same species: are they same?

Authors:  Fumiaki Yano; Rudolf J Stadlhuber; Kazuto Tsuboi; Nobuo Omura; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Yanaga; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  The frequency of glassy cells in Barrett's mucosa: a study in Baboons.

Authors:  Carlos A Rubio; Edward J Dick; Abiel Orrego; Gene B Hubbard
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Flavopiridol reduces malignant transformation of the esophageal mucosa in p27 knockout mice.

Authors:  Mirna Lechpammer; Xiangjun Xu; F Henry Ellis; Nandita Bhattacharaya; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Massimo Loda
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Influence of surgically induced gastric and gastroduodenal content reflux on esophageal carcinogenesis--experimental model in Wistar female rats.

Authors:  L L Melo; C D Kruel; L M Kliemann; L T Cavazzola; R da L Boeno; P C Silber; R S Grossi
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.429

5.  Development and characterization of a surgical mouse model of reflux esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Thai H Pham; Robert M Genta; Stuart Jon Spechler; Rhonda F Souza; David H Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  A second-generation 2-Methoxyestradiol prodrug is effective against Barrett's adenocarcinoma in a mouse xenograft model.

Authors:  Suman Kambhampati; Roger A Rajewski; Mehmet Tanol; Inamul Haque; Amlan Das; Snigdha Banerjee; Saheli Jha; Douglas Burns; Emma Borrego-Diaz; Peter J Van Veldhuizen; Sushanta K Banerjee
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 6.261

7.  Thrombospondin-1 is a major activator of TGF-beta1 in vivo.

Authors:  S E Crawford; V Stellmach; J E Murphy-Ullrich; S M Ribeiro; J Lawler; R O Hynes; G P Boivin; N Bouck
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-06-26       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  A comparison of membrane enzymes of human and pig oesophagus; the pig oesophagus is a good model for studies of the gullet in man.

Authors:  K N Christie; C Thomson; D Hopwood
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1995-03

9.  Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution.

Authors:  Martien A M Groenen; Alan L Archibald; Hirohide Uenishi; Christopher K Tuggle; Yasuhiro Takeuchi; Max F Rothschild; Claire Rogel-Gaillard; Chankyu Park; Denis Milan; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Shengting Li; Denis M Larkin; Heebal Kim; Laurent A F Frantz; Mario Caccamo; Hyeonju Ahn; Bronwen L Aken; Anna Anselmo; Christian Anthon; Loretta Auvil; Bouabid Badaoui; Craig W Beattie; Christian Bendixen; Daniel Berman; Frank Blecha; Jonas Blomberg; Lars Bolund; Mirte Bosse; Sara Botti; Zhan Bujie; Megan Bystrom; Boris Capitanu; Denise Carvalho-Silva; Patrick Chardon; Celine Chen; Ryan Cheng; Sang-Haeng Choi; William Chow; Richard C Clark; Christopher Clee; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Harry D Dawson; Patrice Dehais; Fioravante De Sapio; Bert Dibbits; Nizar Drou; Zhi-Qiang Du; Kellye Eversole; João Fadista; Susan Fairley; Thomas Faraut; Geoffrey J Faulkner; Katie E Fowler; Merete Fredholm; Eric Fritz; James G R Gilbert; Elisabetta Giuffra; Jan Gorodkin; Darren K Griffin; Jennifer L Harrow; Alexander Hayward; Kerstin Howe; Zhi-Liang Hu; Sean J Humphray; Toby Hunt; Henrik Hornshøj; Jin-Tae Jeon; Patric Jern; Matthew Jones; Jerzy Jurka; Hiroyuki Kanamori; Ronan Kapetanovic; Jaebum Kim; Jae-Hwan Kim; Kyu-Won Kim; Tae-Hun Kim; Greger Larson; Kyooyeol Lee; Kyung-Tai Lee; Richard Leggett; Harris A Lewin; Yingrui Li; Wansheng Liu; Jane E Loveland; Yao Lu; Joan K Lunney; Jian Ma; Ole Madsen; Katherine Mann; Lucy Matthews; Stuart McLaren; Takeya Morozumi; Michael P Murtaugh; Jitendra Narayan; Dinh Truong Nguyen; Peixiang Ni; Song-Jung Oh; Suneel Onteru; Frank Panitz; Eung-Woo Park; Hong-Seog Park; Geraldine Pascal; Yogesh Paudel; Miguel Perez-Enciso; Ricardo Ramirez-Gonzalez; James M Reecy; Sandra Rodriguez-Zas; Gary A Rohrer; Lauretta Rund; Yongming Sang; Kyle Schachtschneider; Joshua G Schraiber; John Schwartz; Linda Scobie; Carol Scott; Stephen Searle; Bertrand Servin; Bruce R Southey; Goran Sperber; Peter Stadler; Jonathan V Sweedler; Hakim Tafer; Bo Thomsen; Rashmi Wali; Jian Wang; Jun Wang; Simon White; Xun Xu; Martine Yerle; Guojie Zhang; Jianguo Zhang; Jie Zhang; Shuhong Zhao; Jane Rogers; Carol Churcher; Lawrence B Schook
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Establishing magnetic resonance imaging as an accurate and reliable tool to diagnose and monitor esophageal cancer in a rat model.

Authors:  Juliann E Kosovec; Ali H Zaidi; Yoshihiro Komatsu; Pashtoon M Kasi; Kyle Cothron; Diane V Thompson; Edward Lynch; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  19 in total

1.  Bi-layer silk fibroin grafts support functional tissue regeneration in a porcine model of onlay esophagoplasty.

Authors:  Khalid Algarrahi; Debra Franck; Vivian Cristofaro; Xuehui Yang; Alyssa Savarino; Saif Affas; Frank-Mattias Schäfer; Chiara Ghezzi; Russell Jennings; Arthur Nedder; David L Kaplan; Maryrose P Sullivan; Carlos R Estrada; Joshua R Mauney
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.963

Review 2.  Basis for molecular diagnostics and immunotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Joe Abdo; Devendra K Agrawal; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 4.512

3.  Ductular and proliferative response of esophageal submucosal glands in a porcine model of esophageal injury and repair.

Authors:  Leandi Krüger; Liara M Gonzalez; Tiffany A Pridgen; Shannon J McCall; Richard J von Furstenberg; Ivan Harnden; Gwendolyn E Carnighan; Abigail M Cox; Anthony T Blikslager; Katherine S Garman
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  The study of laryngopharyngeal reflux needs adequate animal model.

Authors:  Jerome R Lechien; Christian Calvo-Henriquez; Miguel Mayo-Yanez; Mariam El Ayoubi; Luigi A Vaira; Antonino Maniacci
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  A Comparative Assessment of the Diagnosis of Swallowing Impairment and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Canines and Humans.

Authors:  Tarini V Ullal; Stanley L Marks; Peter C Belafsky; Jeffrey L Conklin; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-09

6.  [Comparison of B-NDG? and BALB/c mouse models bearing patient-derived xenografts of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].

Authors:  Liuliu Guan; Qingqing Zou; Qian Liu; Size Chen
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2020-08-30

Review 7.  Contribution of immunomodulators to gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications: stromal cells, interleukin 4, and adiponectin.

Authors:  Jing Li; Xiaoxin Luke Chen; Anisa Shaker; Tadayuki Oshima; Jing Shan; Hiroto Miwa; Cheng Feng; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 8.  Understanding the cellular origin and progression of esophageal cancer using esophageal organoids.

Authors:  Uma M Sachdeva; Masataka Shimonosono; Samuel Flashner; Ricardo Cruz-Acuña; Joel T Gabre; Hiroshi Nakagawa
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 9.756

Review 9.  Immunotherapy in gastroesophageal cancers: Current state and future directions.

Authors:  Hira Shaikh; Amir Kamran; Dulabh K Monga
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 1.809

Review 10.  Esophageal Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Henrik Nienhüser; Naita Wirsik; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.