Literature DB >> 26210371

Back pain-related disability and quality of life in patients affected by vertebral fractures: data from baseline characteristics of population enrolled in Denosumab In Real Practice (DIRP).

Antimo Moretti1, Francesca Gimigliano2, Gioconda Di Pietro1, Raffaele Gimigliano1, Giovanni Iolascon3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spine fragility fractures lead to a significant acute and/or chronic pain and worsening of quality of life. Denosumab is effective in reducing the risk of new vertebral fractures, but its effectiveness on pain relief and improvement of the quality of life in patients with spine fractures are not well known. AIM: The aim of this paper is to describe the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, back pain-related disability and quality of life of the Denosumab In Real Practice (DIRP) study population.
METHODS: DIRP is a multicenter prospective observational study evaluating the effectiveness of denosumab in reducing back pain-related disability and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who had already experienced at least one vertebral fragility fracture. Our evaluation protocol includes history of fractures, Spine Pain Index (SPI), HRQoL, bone mineral density (BMD) and radiological assessment of vertebral fragility fractures.
RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-three post-menopausal women, who received a prescription for denosumab, were enrolled. The mean SPI score was 58.6 ± 21.4 SD, and 187 (83.86%) women experienced a moderate-severe pain. The mean HRQoL health state value was 0.54 ± 0.27 SD using EQ-5D index, whereas the mean Physical and Mental Health Composite Scale scores derived from the SF-12 were 31.06 ± 7.77 SD and 39.20 ± 11.03 SD. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: Baseline characteristics of DIRP study cohort indicate that patients who received a prescription of denosumab in Campania region are affected by severe osteoporosis with highly prevalent vertebral fractures, disabling back pain and poor health-related quality of life. This is in contradiction with what it is expected by a front-line drug for osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Back pain; Denosumab; Disability; Osteoporosis; Quality of life; Vertebral fractures

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26210371     DOI: 10.1007/s40520-015-0428-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  5 in total

1.  Low-dose diclofenac in patients with fragility fractures.

Authors:  Letizia Vannucci; Caterina Fossi; Giorgio Gronchi; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2017-05-30

2.  Characterization of neuropathic component of back pain in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Antimo Moretti; Sara Liguori; Marco Paoletta; Giuseppe Toro; Milena Aulicino; Francesca Gimigliano; Giovanni Iolascon
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 3.  What are the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions versus placebo, no treatment or usual care for osteoporosis in people with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5D? - A Cochrane Review summary with commentary.

Authors:  Giovanni Iolascon; Antimo Moretti
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.041

4.  Image classification of osteoporotic vertebral fracture with endplate-disc complex Injury.

Authors:  Shuai Zhang; Song Wang; Qing Wang; Jin Yang; Shuang Xu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  What are the efficacy and safety of bisphosphonates and RANK-ligand-inhibitors for men with prostate cancer and bone metastases? - A Cochrane Review summary with commentary.

Authors:  Antimo Moretti
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.041

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.