Literature DB >> 26210292

A new reusable suturing device for vaginal sacrospinous fixation: feasibility and safety study.

Talia Friedman1, Menahem Neuman2, Yoav Peled3, Haim Krissi4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the feasibility and safety of SeraPro(®) (Serag-Wiessner, Germany), an innovative reusable suturing device for vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation. STUDY
DESIGN: We reviewed the electronic files of all women who underwent vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation with SeraPro(®) for apical pelvic floor prolapse, with or without mesh implant, performed between April 2013 and September 2013. Preoperative demographic, clinical, operative and postoperative data were analyzed. The women were interviewed and examined before the procedure, at one month postoperatively and tele-interviewed again after three months.
RESULTS: Overall, 88 women were included in the study. Fifty-three patients (60.2%) had additional anterior mesh placement, 42 (47.7%) had posterior mesh, and 16 (18.2%) had both anterior and posterior mesh insertion. Five patients (5.7%) had no mesh implant. Sixteen patients (18.2%) had an additional mid-urethral sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. No significant technical difficulty was recorded at the procedures. None of the patients had significant long-term morbidity. The mean 3-month follow-up demonstrated significant anatomical and functional improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: The SeraPro(®) reusable suturing device is a feasible and safe tool for sacrospinous ligament fixation during vaginal pelvic floor reconstruction.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pelvic organ prolapse; Sacrospinous ligament fixation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26210292     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  4 in total

1.  Introducing a true minimally invasive meshless and dissectionless anchoring system for pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Masha Tsivian; Adi Y Weintraub; Menahem Neuman; Alex Tsivian
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Efficacy and safety of skeletonized mesh implants for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: 12-month follow-up.

Authors:  Adi Y Weintraub; Menahem Neuman; Yonatan Reuven; Joerg Neymeyer; Naama Marcus-Braun
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Safety and short term outcomes of a new truly minimallyinvasive mesh-less and dissection-less anchoring system for pelvic organ prolapse apical repair.

Authors:  Adi Y Weintraub; Masha Ben Zvi; David Yohay; Joerg Neymeyer; Yonatan Reuven; Menahem Neuman; Alex Tsivian
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

4.  Responsibility toward affordable healthcare: disposable versus reusable methods for pelvic floor repair.

Authors:  Ivilina Pandeva; Helen Johnson; Mark Slack; Ashish Pradhan
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-10-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.