Literature DB >> 26210240

KRAS Status as an Independent Prognostic Factor for Survival after Yttrium-90 Radioembolization Therapy for Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.

Steven J Lahti1, Minzhi Xing1, Di Zhang2, James J Lee3, Michael J Magnetta1, Hyun S Kim4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation status as a prognostic factor for survival after yttrium-90 ((90)Y) radioembolization for colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with unresectable CRC liver metastases and documented KRAS mutation status who were treated with (90)Y radioembolization during the period 2007-2014 were investigated. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, therapy regimens, and overall survival (OS) from first (90)Y radioembolization were compared between patients with KRAS wild-type (wt) and mutant status. Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox regression were used for survival analysis and to assess independent prognostic factors for OS.
RESULTS: Of 186 patients, 104 underwent KRAS mutation analysis before (90)Y radioembolization, with 45 (43.3%) identified as mutant. The wt and mutant groups were similar in demographics, liver status, overall performance status, and tumor characteristics (all P > .05). Mean time from liver metastasis to (90)Y radioembolization was greater in patients with KRAS wt status (P = .033). A greater percentage of wt patients received anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapies before (90)Y radioembolization (66.1% vs 8.9%; P < .001). Median OS from first (90)Y radioembolization was significantly greater in KRAS wt patients (9.5 mo vs 4.8 mo; P = .041). Univariate analysis identified Child-Pugh class, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), chemotherapy after (90)Y radioembolization, KRAS status, and treatment-induced toxicity as prognostic factors for OS. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated Child-Pugh class, CEA, and KRAS status to be independent prognostic factors for OS, even when correcting for the effect of chemotherapy after (90)Y radioembolization.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CRC and KRAS wt may derive greater survival benefit from (90)Y radioembolization therapy than patients with KRAS mutant.
Copyright © 2015 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26210240     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.05.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  14 in total

Review 1.  The Importance of Biopsy in the Era of Molecular Medicine.

Authors:  Etay Ziv; Jeremy C Durack; Stephen B Solomon
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 2.  Radioembolization of Secondary Hepatic Malignancies.

Authors:  Barbara Manchec; Nima Kokabi; Govindarajan Narayanan; Andrew Niekamp; Constantino Peña; Alex Powell; Brian Schiro; Ripal Gandhi
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 1.780

3.  A single institute retrospective trial of concurrent chemotherapy with SIR-Spheres® versus SIR-Spheres® alone in chemotherapy-resistant colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  May Cho; Jonathan Kessler; John J Park; Aram Lee; Jun Gong; Gagandeep Singh; Yi-Jen Chen; Philip H G Ituarte; Marwan Fakih
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-08

Review 4.  Role of yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy in the treatment of liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer: an evidence-based expert consensus algorithm.

Authors:  D Rohan Jeyarajah; Maria B Majella Doyle; N Joseph Espat; Paul D Hansen; David A Iannitti; Joseph Kim; Thavam Thambi-Pillai; Brendan C Visser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-04

Review 5.  Tumor Biomarkers and Interventional Oncology: Impact on Local Outcomes for Liver and Lung Malignancy.

Authors:  Yuan-Mao Lin; Ryosuke Taiji; Marco Calandri; Bruno C Odisio
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Predictors and prognosticators for survival with Yttrium-90 radioembolization therapy for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

Authors:  Meaghan S Dendy; Johannes M Ludwig; Hyun S Kim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-06

7.  PI3K pathway mutations are associated with longer time to local progression after radioembolization of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Etay Ziv; Michael Bergen; Hooman Yarmohammadi; F Ed Boas; E Nadia Petre; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Rona Yaeger; David B Solit; Stephen B Solomon; Joseph P Erinjeri
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-04

8.  Yttrium-90 radioembolization for colorectal cancer liver metastases in KRAS wild-type and mutant patients: Clinical and ccfDNA studies.

Authors:  E Janowski; O Timofeeva; S Chasovskikh; M Goldberg; A Kim; F Banovac; D Pang; A Dritschilo; K Unger
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.906

9.  Systematic review and network meta-analyses of third-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Walter; Neil S Hawkins; Richard F Pollock; Fabien Colaone; Suki Shergill; Paul J Ross
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 10.  Molecular Determinants and Other Factors to Guide Selection of Patients for Hepatic Resection of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Thomas M Diehl; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.