Literature DB >> 26209916

Plasma membrane and cytoskeleton dynamics during single-cell wound healing.

Eric Boucher1, Craig A Mandato2.   

Abstract

Wounding leads not only to plasma membrane disruption, but also to compromised cytoskeleton structures. This results not only in unwarranted exchanges between the cytosol and extracellular milieu, but also in loss of tensegrity, which may further endanger the cell. Tensegrity can be described as the interplay between the tensile forces generated by the apparent membrane tension, actomyosin contraction, and the cytoskeletal structures resisting those changes (e.g., microtubules). It is responsible for the structural integrity of the cell and for its ability to sense mechanical signals. Recent reviews dealing with single-cell healing mostly focused on the molecular machineries controlling the traffic and fusion of specific vesicles, or their role in different pathologies. In this review, we aim to take a broader view of the different modes of single cell repair, while focussing on the different ways the changes in plasmalemma surface area and composition, plasmalemma tension, and cytoskeletal dynamics may influence and affect single-cell repair.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Keywords:  Cytoskeleton dynamics; Membrane tension; Plasmalemma; Single-cell wound repair; Tensegrity; Tether force

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26209916     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  13 in total

Review 1.  In vitro and ex vivo strategies for intracellular delivery.

Authors:  Martin P Stewart; Armon Sharei; Xiaoyun Ding; Gaurav Sahay; Robert Langer; Klavs F Jensen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Cell healing: Calcium, repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Alison M Moe; Adriana E Golding; William M Bement
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 7.727

3.  Blood flow restricted training leads to myocellular macrophage infiltration and upregulation of heat shock proteins, but no apparent muscle damage.

Authors:  Jakob L Nielsen; Per Aagaard; Tatyana A Prokhorova; Tobias Nygaard; Rune D Bech; Charlotte Suetta; Ulrik Frandsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Cellular mechanisms and signals that coordinate plasma membrane repair.

Authors:  Adam Horn; Jyoti K Jaiswal
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  CHIP-dependent regulation of the actin cytoskeleton is linked to neuronal cell membrane integrity.

Authors:  Catarina Dias; Erisa Nita; Jakub Faktor; Ailish C Tynan; Lenka Hernychova; Borivoj Vojtesek; Jesper Nylandsted; Ted R Hupp; Tilo Kunath; Kathryn L Ball
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-07-17

6.  Serum Protects Cells and Increases Intracellular Delivery of Molecules by Nanoparticle-Mediated Photoporation.

Authors:  Simple Kumar; Eunice Lazau; Carter Kim; Naresh N Thadhani; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-05-31

Review 7.  Plasma membrane disruption (PMD) formation and repair in mechanosensitive tissues.

Authors:  Mackenzie L Hagan; Vanshika Balayan; Meghan E McGee-Lawrence
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.626

8.  Trophic flexibility of marine diplonemids - switching from osmotrophy to bacterivory.

Authors:  Galina Prokopchuk; Tomáš Korytář; Valéria Juricová; Jovana Majstorović; Aleš Horák; Karel Šimek; Julius Lukeš
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 11.217

9.  Control of cytoskeletal dynamics during cellular responses to pore forming toxins.

Authors:  Francisco Sarmento Mesquita; Cláudia Brito; Didier Cabanes; Sandra Sousa
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2017-09-28

10.  Difference in Membrane Repair Capacity Between Cancer Cell Lines and a Normal Cell Line.

Authors:  Stine Krog Frandsen; Anna K McNeil; Ivana Novak; Paul L McNeil; Julie Gehl
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 1.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.