Literature DB >> 26209863

Immediate postpartum initiation of etonogestrel-releasing implant: A randomized controlled trial on breastfeeding impact.

Giordana Campos Braga1, Eduardo Ferriolli2, Silvana Maria Quintana3, Rui Alberto Ferriani4, Karina Pfrimer2, Carolina Sales Vieira4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast milk volume has never been evaluated when the etonogestrel (ENG) implant was inserted immediately postpartum. Thus, this study evaluated if the immediate postpartum insertion of the ENG implant alters breast milk volume. STUDY
DESIGN: Twenty-four postpartum women and their newborns (NBs) were randomized into two groups: Implant group (ENG implant inserted within 48 h after delivery) and Control group (absence of contraceptive method). The primary outcome was the amount of breast milk intake by the NBs in the first 6 weeks after delivery. Five and ten grams of deuterium (D(2)O) were orally administered to the postpartum women on the day of randomization (day 0) and on the 29th study day, respectively. Saliva samples were collected from the mother-NB pairs prior to each D(2)O dose administration and after D(2)O ingestion (periodic collection). The amount of breast milk ingested by the NBs was estimated by the amount of deuterium (D(2)O) ingested by the NBs through breastfeeding, using mass spectrometry in the saliva samples.
RESULTS: Twenty-four postpartum women and their NB were randomized (12 per group). The median of breast milk intake by NBs following the two D(2)O doses were similar between groups {first D(2)O dose [Implant: 340 mL/day (240-420 mL/day) vs. CONTROL: 330 mL/day (300-530 mL/day), p=.54]; second D(2)O dose [Implant: 845 mL/day (770-980 mL/day) vs. CONTROL: 785 mL/day (680-980 mL/day), p=.63]}. The exclusive breastfeeding rate and NB weight were similar between groups in the first 6 weeks postpartum.
CONCLUSION: ENG implant insertion immediately postpartum does not alter the volume of breast milk intake by NBs. IMPLICATIONS: Considering the benefits of immediate postpartum initiation of ENG implant on reducing unintended pregnancy and pregnancy recurrence, especially in vulnerable populations, our study adds safety data on breastfeeding effect of this practice.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breastfeeding; Contraception; Deuterium; Etonogestrel

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26209863     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  7 in total

1.  The effect of immediate postpartum levonorgestrel contraceptive implant use on breastfeeding and infant growth: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sarah Averbach; Othman Kakaire; Rachel McDiehl; Christine Dehlendorf; Felicia Lester; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 2.  Immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion of contraceptive implant for contraception.

Authors:  Jen Sothornwit; Yuthapong Werawatakul; Srinaree Kaewrudee; Pisake Lumbiganon; Malinee Laopaiboon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-22

Review 3.  Association of Etonogestrel-Releasing Contraceptive Implant with Reduced Weight Gain in an Exclusively Breastfed Infant: Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Alison M Stuebe; Amy G Bryant; Robyn Lewis; Anitha Muddana
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 4.  Optimizing maternal and neonatal outcomes with postpartum contraception: impact on breastfeeding and birth spacing.

Authors:  Aparna Sridhar; Jennifer Salcedo
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2017-01-13

5.  A Comparison of Breastfeeding Exclusivity and Duration Rates Between Immediate Postpartum Levonorgestrel Versus Etonogestrel Implant Users: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jamie W Krashin; Clara Lemani; Jerome Nkambule; George Talama; Lameck Chinula; Valerie L Flax; Alison M Stuebe; Jennifer H Tang
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Acceptability of ENG-releasing subdermal implants among postpartum Brazilian young women during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Mariane Massaini Barbieri; Thuany Bento Herculano; Amanda Dantas Silva; Luis Bahamondes; Cassia Raquel Teatin Juliato; Fernanda Garanhani Surita
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.447

Review 7.  Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Morena Luigia Rocca; Anna Rita Palumbo; Federica Visconti; Costantino Di Carlo
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.