E Tsiga1, E Panagopoulou2, D Niakas3. 1. Department of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece. 2. Department of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece, efharis@the.forthnet.gr. 3. School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, GR-26335 Patra, Greece.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although several studies have examined the link between specific working conditions and health behaviours, very few have comparatively assessed the health behaviours of different occupational groups. AIMS: To compare protective and risky health behaviours among police officers, ambulance workers, hospital staff (doctors and nurses) and office workers, prompted by the need to identify key areas for interventions tailored to the needs of different occupational groups. METHODS: A cross-sectional postal survey using the Health Behaviours Inventory, assessing health behaviours which are risky (alcohol intake, smoking, coffee consumption, fast food meals and painkiller consumption) and protective (physical activity, eating breakfast and hours of sleep). RESULTS: The sample consisted of 1451 employees. Ambulance workers smoked the most cigarettes per day (F (4, 1405) = 8.63, P < 0.01), while doctors consumed twice as many fast food meals as any other occupational group (F (4, 1415) = 78.45, P < 0.01) and had the highest daily caffeine consumption (F (4, 1440) = 11.17, P < 0.01). Ambulance workers and doctors reported the highest frequency of alcohol consumption per week (F (4, 1421) = 10.13, P < 0.01). In regard to protective health behaviours, office workers reported the highest number of breakfast meals per week (F (4, 1431) = 5.7, P < 0.01) and sleeping hours per night (F (4, 1438) = 170.34, P < 0.01), while police officers and ambulance workers exercised more frequently (F (4, 1420) = 5.764, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study highlight key priorities for health promotion for different occupational groups which need to be taken into consideration in policy making and developing workplace interventions.
BACKGROUND: Although several studies have examined the link between specific working conditions and health behaviours, very few have comparatively assessed the health behaviours of different occupational groups. AIMS: To compare protective and risky health behaviours among police officers, ambulance workers, hospital staff (doctors and nurses) and office workers, prompted by the need to identify key areas for interventions tailored to the needs of different occupational groups. METHODS: A cross-sectional postal survey using the Health Behaviours Inventory, assessing health behaviours which are risky (alcohol intake, smoking, coffee consumption, fast food meals and painkiller consumption) and protective (physical activity, eating breakfast and hours of sleep). RESULTS: The sample consisted of 1451 employees. Ambulance workers smoked the most cigarettes per day (F (4, 1405) = 8.63, P < 0.01), while doctors consumed twice as many fast food meals as any other occupational group (F (4, 1415) = 78.45, P < 0.01) and had the highest daily caffeine consumption (F (4, 1440) = 11.17, P < 0.01). Ambulance workers and doctors reported the highest frequency of alcohol consumption per week (F (4, 1421) = 10.13, P < 0.01). In regard to protective health behaviours, office workers reported the highest number of breakfast meals per week (F (4, 1431) = 5.7, P < 0.01) and sleeping hours per night (F (4, 1438) = 170.34, P < 0.01), while police officers and ambulance workers exercised more frequently (F (4, 1420) = 5.764, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study highlight key priorities for health promotion for different occupational groups which need to be taken into consideration in policy making and developing workplace interventions.
Authors: Anna Alexandrova-Karamanova; Irina Todorova; Anthony Montgomery; Efharis Panagopoulou; Patricia Costa; Adriana Baban; Asli Davas; Milan Milosevic; Dragan Mijakoski Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Elizabeth A Dodson; J Aaron Hipp; Jung Ae Lee; Lin Yang; Christine M Marx; Rachel G Tabak; Ross C Brownson Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2016-11-03
Authors: Rie Tanaka; Mayumi Tsuji; Ayako Senju; Koichi Kusuhara; Toshihiro Kawamoto Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Maria Niestrój-Jaworska; Małgorzata Dębska-Janus; Jacek Polechoński; Rajmund Tomik Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: José C Vera-Jiménez; Marta Ferreiro-González; Gerardo F Barbero; José Ángel Álvarez; Francisco Fernández-Zacarías; Jesús Ayuso Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 3.295