Edvin Prifti1, Majlinda Ikonomi2, Altin Veshti2, Aurel Demiraj2, Roland Xhaxho2. 1. Division of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Center of Tirana, Albania. Electronic address: priftiedvin@gmail.com. 2. Division of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Center of Tirana, Albania.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The papillary fibroelastoma (PFE) is a rare and benign primary cardiac tumor, and the mostly frequently found tumor occurring in cardiac valves. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a 52 year old female presenting a history of 2 weeks of fever due to wound infection after breast's surgery. A preoperative echocardiography demonstrated a mass >1cm(2) originating from the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve mimicking vegetation. The patient underwent successful surgical removal of the PFE. The histologic evaluation demonstrated a PFE. DISCUSSION: With the introduction of echocardiography, the diagnosis of these tumors in living patients has been reported sporadically. PFE have been found most often on valve leaflets, chordae tendineae, and both ventricles. The differential diagnosis of PFE includes other cardiac tumors, thrombus, vegetation, and Lambl's excrescences. CONCLUSION: To summarize, we report a PFE of the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve. The diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological examination after surgical removal. Finally, careful echocardiographic analyses during evaluation of valvular masses are strongly recommended for differential diagnosis.
INTRODUCTION: The papillary fibroelastoma (PFE) is a rare and benign primary cardiac tumor, and the mostly frequently found tumor occurring in cardiac valves. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a 52 year old female presenting a history of 2 weeks of fever due to wound infection after breast's surgery. A preoperative echocardiography demonstrated a mass >1cm(2) originating from the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve mimicking vegetation. The patient underwent successful surgical removal of the PFE. The histologic evaluation demonstrated a PFE. DISCUSSION: With the introduction of echocardiography, the diagnosis of these tumors in living patients has been reported sporadically. PFE have been found most often on valve leaflets, chordae tendineae, and both ventricles. The differential diagnosis of PFE includes other cardiac tumors, thrombus, vegetation, and Lambl's excrescences. CONCLUSION: To summarize, we report a PFE of the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve. The diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological examination after surgical removal. Finally, careful echocardiographic analyses during evaluation of valvular masses are strongly recommended for differential diagnosis.
The papillary fibroelastoma is a rare and benign primary cardiac tumor, and the mostly frequently found tumor occurring in cardiac valves. The papillary fibroelastoma was firstly described by Yater in 1931 [1]. With the introduction of echocardiography, the diagnosis of these tumors in living patients has been reported sporadically. The papillary fibroelastoma has been found most often on valve leaflets, chordae tendineae, and both ventricles. We describe an interesting case of the papillary fibroelastoma originating from the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve mimicking vegetation.
Case report
A 52-year-old woman was readmitted to a regional hospital due to wound infection after a previous mastectomy due to breast cancer. She received antibiotics for 2 weeks to treat a suspicious vegetation apparent on TTE (Fig. 1A). Because the size of the cardiac mass had not changed, the patient was referred to our hospital for further evaluation.
Fig. 1
Transthoracic echocardiography shows a mobile and spherical mass of 1.0 cm in size attached to anterior mitral leaflet. Parasternal long axis view (A) and an apical four-chamberview (B). Gross specimen of excised mass reveals a friable mass with frond-like surface.
On physical examination, her blood pressure, pulse and respiration rates were within normal values. The body temperature was 37.5 °C. The laboratory findings revealed 15,700/mm3 leucytosis, platelet count, 3251,000/mm3 and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, 53 mm/hr. Results of urinalysis, blood chemistry, and electrolyte tests were within normal ranges. The TEE revealed a mass of >1.0 cm2 in size, mobile, attached to anterior mitral leaflet on the atrial aspect, and round with a homogenously speckled surface (Fig. 1B). There was moderate to severe mitral regurgitation. Non Janeway lesion, Osler nodes, and conjunctival hemorrhage were detected in physical examination.The cardiac mass was removed by surgery in order to reduce the risk of embolism as well as to rule out the infective endocarditis. Under standard cardiopulmonary bypass, the left atrium was opened and the mass was identified (Fig. 1C). The mass was removed using a shave excision technique. However, there was significant mitral regurgitation after mass excision and following excision of the mitral leaflets and chordae, a mechanical valve was implanted with preservation of the subvalvular apparatus of the mitral valve.Macroscopically the excised lesion was composed of a soft beige tissue with micropapillary projections and lobulated surface of 1.2 × 0.8 cm, entirely processed (Fig. 1D). The mass appeared yellowish, with polypoid and fibrotic characteristics.After the surgical excision, the mass was fixed in formalin, paraffin embedded, sectioned at 3 μm thick, and stained conventionally with hematoxylin and eosin. The histology examination revealed a papillary lesion composed of numorous papillary fronds with an acelular fibro-hialinous stroma (Fig. 2A and B). Those projectiones are covered by endothelial cells (Fig. 2C). In the excised margin in close contact with the non pathologic endocardial tissue the lesion has an infiltrative like appearance but the excisional margin itself was free of neoplasia. A higher magnification demonstrates a myxoid papillary structure lined by endothelial cells which express endothelial cell markers (Fig. 2D). The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged in a satisfactory condition on the seventh day.
Fig. 2
Papillary fibroelastoma. Low magnification demonstrates a papillary configuration of paucicellular fronds (A, B H–E 10X). A higher magnification demonstrates a myxoid papillary structure lined by endothelial cells which express endothelial cell markers (C H–E 40X, D,CD 34 20X)
Discussion
Different mechanisms such as prior damage to the endothelium, hamartomatous origin, and organizing emboli to cause PFE [2]. If trauma is mechanically induced, PFE can occur in proximity to the iatrogenic injury such as it is demonstrated in a series of patients undergoing previous cardiac surgery [3]. The presence of fibrin and elastin fibers within the fronds supports the hypothesis that PFE may arise from organizing thrombi [2]. One of the most discussed theories is the microthrombus theory which streses the fact tat this lesions are acquired and they originate as small thrombi that serve as a nidus for further ecrescents to minor endothelial site injury of the valves or to previous diseased valves. PFE is considered also a hamartomatous growth of endocardial tissue that may give rise to neurologic symptoms when located on the left side of the heart.PFE is similiar to Lambl’s excrescence, but the site may be anywhere on the endocardium, and the lesion is large enough to potentially cause symptoms by embolization of attached thrombi or prolapse into a coronary orifice [6-9]. The other theory is that PFE are true tumoral lesions that predominantly affect heart valves, with the aortic valve as the most frequently involved followed by the mitral valve.The differential diagnosis of PFE includes other cardiac tumors, thrombus, vegetation, and Lambl’s excrescences. One of the most considered differential diagnosis is cardiac myxoma. In contrast to myxoma, there are no vascular structures and associated inflammation within the fronds. PFE has several characteristic findings which may help to differentiate it from thrombus [8] or vegetation [9]. Similar to vegetations, PFE is usually found on cardiac valves however PFE is often a solitary mass, usually of small size (<1 cm), usually at the mid-portion of valve leaflets, and with a frond-like characteristic surface. However, PFE may lack some of these findings whereas vegetations may represent many of these characteristics. For that reason, PFE can often be differentiated by clinical informations, blood cultures and laboratory tests. In this case, there was evidence of wound infection, so the clinical information was quite misleading.Although PFEs are benign, they can cause serious complications such as thromboembolism, myocardial ischemia, stroke and sudden death [4]. The systemic embolism is more frequently found in PFE of mitral [5]. Surgical excision of PFE is recommended for symptomatic patients and asymptomatic patients with a fragile mass nature and frond-like papillary tissues of the tumor itself [10,11].Most PFE are asymptomatic. Right-sided PFE are asymptomatic and rarely cause pulmonary embolism [12], instead left-sided fibroelastomas can cause life-threatening complications. Patients might present chest pain, which may be anginal or atypical. Acute myocardial infarction, caused by a tumor occluding the coronary ostium or by embolization, may be the presenting symptom [12]. Cerebral embolization, either of fibrin or of a tumor fragment, has also been reported; this may present as a transient ischemic attack or visual disturbance.Considering the patient’s age, tumor mobility and tumor size, we decided to remove the cardiac mass to prevent potential complications such as embolization. The treatment of choice for PFE is surgical excision, which is safe without causing significant morbidity or mortality. When valvular involvement is present, excision with valve repair or replacement is curative [2]. To summarize, we report a PFE of the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve. The diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological examination after surgical removal. Finally, careful echocardiographic analyses during evaluation of valvular masses are strongly recommended for differential diagnosis.
Statement
This report has received the ethics committee approval. We confirm that we have obtained consent to publish such an information from the patient to report individual patient data. None of the authors have competing interests with the manuscript.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Funding
None.
Ethical approval
The study received ethic committed approval, by the institutional ethic committe who fully approved.
Author contributions
Edvin Prifti and Altin Veshti performed surgery. Majlinda Ikonomi performed the histologic diagnosis. Aurel Demiraj performed the preoperative diagnosis and follow up. Edvin Prifti and Roland Xhaxho were involved in study concept and design. Majlinda Ikonomi the literature review. Aurel Demiraj and Altin Veshgti were involved in writing the paper.
Consent
The patient and family gave their total consent.AEdvin Prifti and Altin Veshti performed surgery. Majlinda Ikonomi performed the histologic diagnosis. Aurel Demiraj performed the preoperative diagnosis and follow up. Edvin Prifti and Roland Xhaxho were involved in study concept and design. Majlinda Ikonomi the literature review. Aurel Demiraj and Altin Veshgti were involved in writing the paper.
Authors: Anil N Kurup; Henry D Tazelaar; William D Edwards; Allen P Burke; Renu Virmani; Kyle W Klarich; Thomas A Orszulak Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.466