| Literature DB >> 26209445 |
Wei Xu1, Ran Guan2, Yisong Lu3, Xiaoyan Su4, Ye Xu5, Aifang Du6, Songhua Hu7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mastitis is considered the most significant and persistent disease in dairy cows, bringing about large economic losses. Subclinical mastitis brings about major cost implications, for it is difficult to detect due to absence of any visible indications and can persist in the mammary tissue throughout lactation. Immunomodulators have been widely used to reduce intramammary infections by modulating bovine mammary gland. Atractylodis macrocephalae Koidz. polysaccharides (RAMP), extracted from herbal medicine, has been used widely especially for its immunomodulatory function for many years. The objective of this study was to estimate an oil emulsified Atractylodis macrocephalae Koidz. polysaccharides (RAMP-O) as a potential therapeutic agent to treat subclinical mastitis by subcutaneous injection of RAMP-O in the area of supramammary lymph node in lactating cows via analysis of SCC, IMIs and NAGase.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26209445 PMCID: PMC4514974 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-015-0494-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1FTIR spectroscopy of RAMP. The FITR spectrum of RAMP showed a strong broad band of absorption at 3386.08 cm−1 attributed to O-H stretching vibration of the polysaccharides. The band at 2929.71 cm−1 was ascribed to C-H stretching vibration in carbohydrates and the band at 1633.08 cm−1 was due to the presence of bound water. The characteristic peak of absorption at 873.02 cm−1 was due to the variable-angle vibration of β-configuration C-H of pyranose. The band at 819.07 cm−1 was attributed to the variable-angle vibration of C-H of furan ring. The absorption peak at 350–660 cm−1 indicated that it was a pyran-type polysaccharide
Fig. 21H NMR spectrum of RAMP. The 1H NMR spectra showed that RAMP was a polysaccharide with both α and β configurations, while the β-configuration is dominant
Fig. 3Irritancy of RAMP-O on milk SCC. SCC of composite milk in cows before and after subcutaneous injection of RAMP-O in left and right areas of supramammary lymph node in cow 435
Influence of RAMP-O on composite milk SCC
| RAMP-O (mg) | No. of cows | Weeks post treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0† | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| 16 | 6 | 73.01 ± 10.05 | 65.79 ± 5.96 | 63.62 ± 17.94a* | 54.65 ± 16.66a** |
| 32 | 6 | 72.93 ± 18.42 | 62.31 ± 19.10 | 46.54 ± 25.14a | 42.34 ± 21.30a* |
| 48 | 6 | 71.48 ± 16.07 | 49.85 ± 23.49 | 45.01 ± 17.57A** | 41.83 ± 14.81A* |
| Control | 6 | 76.39 ± 14.38 | 77.20 ± 13.81 | 85.17 ± 12.15 | 77.47 ± 14.24 |
SCC of composite milk in cows before and after subcutaneous injection of RAMP-O in the areas of supramammary lymph node (mean ± S.E. 104 cells/ml)
aP < 0.05, AP < 0.01, compared with the control in the same time
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, compared with pretreatment
†Pretreatment
Influence of RAMP-O on composite milk NAGase
| RAMP-O (mg) | No. of cows | Weeks post treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0† | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| 16 | 6 | 52.07 ± 12.50 | 46.75 ± 10.09* | 46.31 ± 9.79* | 33.91 ± 9.27a* |
| 32 | 6 | 52.46 ± 12.24 | 46.18 ± 9.49* | 25.36 ± 6.77A** | 23.79 ± 5.47A** |
| 48 | 6 | 52.11 ± 11.35 | 27.27 ± 8.09A** | 24.97 ± 6.85A** | 21.09 ± 3.44A** |
| Control | 6 | 52.66 ± 12.12 | 52.90 ± 12.07 | 55.09 ± 11.73 | 53.13 ± 11.81 |
NAGase of composite milk in cows before and after subcutaneous injection of RAMP-O in the areas of supramammary lymph node (mean ± S.E. U/L)
aP < 0.05, AP < 0.01, compared with the control in the same time
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, compared with pretreatment
†Pretreatment
Influence of RAMP-O on quarter milk SCC
| Group | No. of quarters†† | Weeks post treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0† | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| RAMP-O | 14 | 63.39 ± 21.92 | 48.59 ± 27.52 | 40.18 ± 11.79a* | 37.38 ± 11.36a* |
| Control | 12 | 60.32 ± 10.20 | 54.53 ± 53.63 | 70.64 ± 67.24 | 64.37 ± 54.85 |
SCC of quarter milk in cows before and after subcutaneous injection of RAMP-O in the areas of supramammary lymph node (mean ± S.E. 104 cells/ml)
aP < 0.05, compared with the control in the same time
*P < 0.05, compared with pretreatment
†Pretreatment
††The quarter had milk with SCC more than 500,000 cells/ml and positive bacterial examination before treatment
Influence of RAMP-O on quarter milk NAGase
| Group | No. of quarters†† | Weeks post treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0† | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| RAMP-O | 14 | 43.03 ± 26.69 | 23.75 ± 8.91a* | 22.16 ± 9.59a** | 17.86 ± 4.36a** |
| Control | 12 | 38.01 ± 9.00 | 36.12 ± 28.89 | 76.30 ± 83.06** | 61.59 ± 75.76 |
NAGase of quarter milk in cows before and after subcutaneous injection of RAMP-O in the areas of supramammary lymph node (mean ± S.E. U/L)
aP < 0.05, compared with the control in the same time
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, compared with pretreatment
†Pretreatment
††The quarter had milk with SCC more than 500,000 cells/ml and positive bacterial examination before treatment
Influence of RAMP-O on SCC of composite milk
| Group | No. of cows | Pretreatment | Posttreatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAMP-O | 11 | 62.55 ± 25.38 | 29.21 ± 6.85a* |
| Control | 11 | 56.66 ± 32.34 | 54.89 ± 11.88 |
SCC of composite milk in cows before and after subcutaneous injection of RAMP-O in the areas of supramammary lymph node (mean ± S.E. 104 cells/ml)
aP < 0.05, compared with the control in the same time
*P < 0.05, compared with pretreatment
Influence of RAMP-O on bacteria
| Bacterium | Weeks post treatment | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAMP-O | Control | |||||||
| 0† | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0† | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
|
| 7 | 6 | 4 | 3* | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
|
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| CNS# and others | 7 | 7 | 5 | 3* | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Total | 21 | 19 | 12* | 9* | 23 | 20 | 22 | 22 |
Milk samples with positive bacterial examination (tested quarters: 41 in RAMP-O; 44 in control)
*P < 0.05, compared with pretreatment
†Pretreatment
#CNS, coagulase negative staphylococci