Literature DB >> 26209056

Value and determinants of the mean systemic filling pressure in critically ill patients.

Xavier Repessé1, Cyril Charron1, Julia Fink1, Alain Beauchet2, Florian Deleu1, Michel Slama3, Guillaume Belliard1, Antoine Vieillard-Baron4.   

Abstract

Mean systemic filling pressure (Pmsf) is a major determinant of venous return. Its value is unknown in critically ill patients (ICU). Our objectives were to report Pmsf in critically ill patients and to look for its clinical determinants, if any. We performed a prospective study in 202 patients who died in the ICU with a central venous and/or arterial catheter. One minute after the heart stopped beating, intravascular pressures were recorded in the supine position after ventilator disconnection. Parameters at admission, during the ICU stay, and at the time of death were prospectively collected. One-minute Pmsf was 12.8 ± 5.6 mmHg. It did not differ according to gender, severity score, diagnosis at admission, fluid balance, need for and duration of mechanical ventilation, or length of stay. Nor was there any difference according to suspected cause of death, classified as shock (cardiogenic, septic, and hemorrhagic) and nonshock, although a large variability of values was observed. The presence of norepinephrine at the time of death (102 patients) was associated with a higher 1-min Pmsf (14 ± 6 vs. 11.4 ± 4.5 mmHg), whereas the decision to forgo life-sustaining therapy (34 patients) was associated with a lower 1-min Pmsf (10.9 ± 3.8 vs. 13.1 ± 5.3 mmHg). In a multiple-regression analysis, norepinephrine (β = 2.67, P = 0.0004) and age (β = -0.061, P = 0.022) were associated with 1-min Pmsf. One-minute Pmsf appeared highly variable without any difference according to the kind of shock and fluid balance, but was higher with norepinephrine.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hemodynamics; venous return

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26209056     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00413.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  10 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of systemic venous return and the impact of positive pressure ventilation.

Authors:  David Berger; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

Review 2.  Venous return and the physical connection between distribution of segmental pressures and volumes.

Authors:  George L Brengelmann
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 3.  Venous return and mean systemic filling pressure: physiology and clinical applications.

Authors:  Romain Persichini; Christopher Lai; Jean-Louis Teboul; Imane Adda; Laurent Guérin; Xavier Monnet
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 19.334

4.  Assessment of Dynamic Changes in Stressed Volume and Venous Return during Hyperdynamic Septic Shock.

Authors:  Athanasios Chalkias; Eleni Laou; Nikolaos Papagiannakis; Vaios Spyropoulos; Evaggelia Kouskouni; Kassiani Theodoraki; Theodoros Xanthos
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-29

5.  The effect of fluid resuscitation on the effective circulating volume in patients undergoing liver surgery: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jaap Jan Vos; A F Kalmar; H G D Hendriks; J Bakker; T W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  Estimating mean circulatory filling pressure in clinical practice: a systematic review comparing three bedside methods in the critically ill.

Authors:  Marije Wijnberge; Daniko P Sindhunata; Michael R Pinsky; Alexander P Vlaar; Else Ouweneel; Jos R Jansen; Denise P Veelo; Bart F Geerts
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 6.925

7.  The inspiration hold maneuver is a reliable method to assess mean systemic filling pressure but its clinical value remains unclear.

Authors:  Lex M van Loon; Hans van der Hoeven; Peter H Veltink; Joris Lemson
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-11

8.  Comments on "Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness": which parameter to assess right ventricular failure and venous congestion?

Authors:  Osama Abou-Arab; Mouhamed D Moussa; Christophe Beyls; Yazine Mahjoub
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Changes of operative performance of pulse pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in endotoxin shock.

Authors:  Jorge Iván Alvarado Sánchez; Juan Daniel Caicedo Ruiz; Juan Jose Diaztagle Fernández; Gustavo Adolfo Ospina Tascon; Manuel Ignacio Monge Garcia; Guillermo Arturo Ruiz Narvaez; Luis Eduardo Cruz Martínez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Clinical validation of a computerized algorithm to determine mean systemic filling pressure.

Authors:  Loek P B Meijs; Joris van Houte; Bente C M Conjaerts; Alexander J G H Bindels; Arthur Bouwman; Saskia Houterman; Jan Bakker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.502

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.