| Literature DB >> 26208847 |
Shunsuke Takahashi1, Kenichi Kohashi1, Hidetaka Yamamoto1, Minako Hirahashi1, Reiko Kumagai1, Nobuyoshi Takizawa1, Kazuhiko Nakamura2, Yoshihiko Maehara3, Masao Tanaka4, Ryoichi Takayanagi2, Yoshinao Oda5.
Abstract
Medullary carcinoma (MC) of the colorectum is known as a rare variant with favorable prognosis despite its poorly differentiated morphology. The mechanism of its favorable behavior has been unclear. Here, we compared the expressions of adhesion molecules and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related proteins in the central portion and invasive front between 43 MCs and 30 poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas (PDAs). The expressions of membranous E-cadherin (P < .0001), β-catenin (P < .0001) and claudin 1 (P = .0036) were significantly preserved in the invasive front of the MCs compared to those in the invasive front of the PDAs. E-cadherin membranous expression was also significantly preserved in the central portion of the MCs (P = .0178). Nuclear β-catenin expression in both the central portion (P = .0463) and invasive front (P = .0346) of the MCs was significantly less frequent compared to that in the PDAs. Snail (P = .0035) and Twist1 (P = .0463) expressions in the invasive front of the MCs were significantly less frequent compared to the PDAs, suggesting that the EMT phenomenon may occur rarely in colorectal MC. Reduced membranous E-cadherin expression in the MC central portion was significantly correlated with poor clinical outcome (P = .0086). Our immunohistochemical results indicate that preserved adhesion molecule protein and less frequent expression of EMT-related transcription factors in the invasive front contribute to the favorable prognosis of colorectal MCs. We suggest that a reduced expression of E-cadherin in the central portion might be a good biomarker for an unfavorable prognosis in cases of MC.Entities:
Keywords: Adhesion molecules; Colorectum; Epithelial-mesenchymal transition; Medullary carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26208847 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.05.023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Pathol ISSN: 0046-8177 Impact factor: 3.466