Literature DB >> 26208846

Immunohistochemical and molecular profiling of histologically defined apocrine carcinomas of the breast.

Semir Vranic1, Caterina Marchiò2, Isabella Castellano2, Cristina Botta2, Maria Stella Scalzo2, Ryan P Bender3, Cesar Payan-Gomez4, Ludovica Verdun di Cantogno2, Patrizia Gugliotta2, Fabrizio Tondat5, Paola Francia di Celle5, Sara Mariani5, Zoran Gatalica3, Anna Sapino6.   

Abstract

Despite the marked improvement in the understanding of molecular mechanisms and classification of apocrine carcinoma, little is known about its specific molecular genetic alterations and potentially targetable biomarkers. In this study, we explored immunohistochemical and molecular genetic characteristics of 37 invasive apocrine carcinomas using immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays. IHC revealed frequent E-cadherin expression (89%), moderate (16%) proliferation activity [Ki-67, phosphohistone H3], infrequent (~10%) expression of basal cell markers [CK5/6, CK14, p63, caveolin-1], loss of PTEN (83%), and overexpression of HER2 (32%), EGFR (41%), cyclin D1 (50%), and MUC-1 (88%). MLPA assay revealed gene copy gains of MYC, CCND1, ZNF703, CDH1, and TRAF4 in 50% or greater of the apocrine carcinomas, whereas gene copy losses frequently affected BRCA2 (75%), ADAM9 (54%), and BRCA1 (46%). HER2 gain, detected by MLPA in 38% of the cases, was in excellent concordance with HER2 results obtained by IHC/FISH (κ = 0.915, P < .001). TOP2A gain was observed in one case, while five cases (21%) exhibited TOP2A loss. Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis revealed two distinct clusters: HER2-positive and HER2-negative (P = .03 and .04, respectively). NGS assay revealed mutations of the TP53 (2 of 7, 29%), BRAF/KRAS (2 of 7, 29%), and PI3KCA/PTEN genes (7 of 7, 100%). We conclude that morphologically defined apocrine carcinomas exhibit complex molecular genetic alterations that are consistent with the "luminal-complex" phenotype. Some of the identified molecular targets are promising biomarkers; however, functional studies are needed to prove these observations.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Androgen receptor; Breast carcinoma–apocrine carcinoma; Fluorescent in situ hybridization; Immunohistochemistry; Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification; Next-generation sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26208846     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  16 in total

1.  Salivary Duct Carcinoma and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast: A Comparative Immunohistochemical Study.

Authors:  Jalal B Jalaly; Souzan Sanati; Rebecca D Chernock; Dikson G Dibe; Samir K El-Mofty
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2018-01-04

Review 2.  Racial disparity in breast cancer: can it be mattered for prognosis and therapy.

Authors:  Vijayalaxmi Gupta; Inamul Haque; Jinia Chakraborty; Stephanie Graff; Snigdha Banerjee; Sushanta K Banerjee
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.782

Review 3.  Apocrine carcinoma of the breast: A brief update on the molecular features and targetable biomarkers.

Authors:  Semir Vranic; Rebecca Feldman; Zoran Gatalica
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.363

4.  Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes status, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, and clinicopathological features of 41 cases of pure apocrine carcinoma of the breast: a retrospective study based on clinical pathological analysis and different immune statuses.

Authors:  Xuexue Xiao; Su Jin; Geling Zhangyang; Shiwei Xiao; Fang Na; Junqiu Yue
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-06

5.  Sclerosing Polycystic Adenoma: Conclusive Clinical and Molecular Evidence of Its Neoplastic Nature.

Authors:  Juan C Hernandez-Prera; Daryoush Saeed-Vafa; Amin Heidarian; Kathleen Gewandter; Kristen Otto; Bruce M Wenig
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2021-08-19

6.  Dose invasive apocrine adenocarcinoma has worse prognosis than invasive ductal carcinoma of breast: evidence from SEER database.

Authors:  Ning Zhang; Hanwen Zhang; Tong Chen; Qifeng Yang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-11

7.  Drug-screening and genomic analyses of HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines reveal predictors for treatment response.

Authors:  Sandra Jernström; Vesa Hongisto; Suvi-Katri Leivonen; Eldri Undlien Due; Dagim Shiferaw Tadele; Henrik Edgren; Olli Kallioniemi; Merja Perälä; Gunhild Mari Mælandsmo; Kristine Kleivi Sahlberg
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2017-03-21

8.  Evaluation of the expression and clinical value of lncRNA AC010761.9 in human gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Zhihua Wang; Kai Wang; Yuan Dang; Xiaojuan Ouyang; Fan Zhang; Wenyuan Wang; Lie Wang; Qiaojia Huang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 9.  Histology of Luminal Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ramona Erber; Arndt Hartmann
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  Obesity and Androgen Receptor Signaling: Associations and Potential Crosstalk in Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Nelson Rangel; Victoria E Villegas; Milena Rondón-Lagos
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.