| Literature DB >> 26208311 |
Nicola Quaranta1, Valentina Squeo1, Moris Sangineto2, Giusi Graziano3, Carlo Sabbà2.
Abstract
Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) is a common otologic emergency whose cause is still unclear. The importance of blood lipids in the pathogenesis of ISSHL is widely reported in literature. In fact elevated levels of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), total cholesterol (TC) and apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) have been proposed as risk factors for this pathology. No correlation has been described between serum lipid parameters and the prognosis of ISSHL. Aim of the present study was to identify prognostic factors associated with hearing recovery in a group of patients affected by ISSHL. Ninety-four patients with the diagnosis of ISSHL hospitalized between March 2013 and October 2014 were included in this study. Patients' blood sampling and hearing assessments were carried out. Patients were divided into two groups as "recovered" and "unrecovered", according to their response to the treatment. We found a statistically significant higher level of total cholesterol in the unrecovered group compared to the recovered one (p = 0.03). None of the other routine laboratory parameters have shown a statistically significant difference between the patients successfully treated and patients with poor outcomes. Total cholesterol concentrations may be a prognostic factor for recovery in ISSHL and should be assessed together with routine tests in patients with this condition. The other routine laboratory parameters seem to have no effect on the development and prognosis of this pathology.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26208311 PMCID: PMC4514871 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133300
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population.
| Parameter | Mean | SD | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 48.4 | 16.7 | 13 | 83 |
| Height (m) | 1.7 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
|
| 73.8 | 15.4 | 38 | 135 |
|
| 25.3 | 4.5 | 15.6 | 37.4 |
|
| 119.7 | 13.4 | 90 | 150 |
|
| 76.2 | 6.6 | 60 | 90 |
|
| 97.8 | 30.4 | 53 | 241 |
|
| 184.8 | 42.7 | 96 | 289 |
|
| 53.4 | 14.3 | 2 | 86 |
|
| 110 | 37.5 | 34 | 219 |
|
| 101.8 | 54 | 19 | 340 |
|
| 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 5.9 |
|
| 257 | 52.5 | 161 | 446 |
|
| 41.7 | 4 | 30.2 | 51.2 |
|
| 5.5 | 2.2 | 2 | 12.1 |
|
| 2.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 4.8 |
|
| 3.7 | 5.9 | 0.6 | 54.1 |
|
| 249.5 | 56.2 | 135 | 402 |
|
| 8.2 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 16.5 |
|
| 157.8 | 185.5 | 27 | 1736.8 |
|
| 11.5 | 9.7 | 2 | 46 |
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population (n = 94). BMI: body mass index; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HCT haematocrit; HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; NLR neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PA: arterial pressure; PLR platelets to lymphocyte ratio; PT-INR pro-thrombin international normalised ratio; WBC White blood cells.
Symptoms and associated diseases in study population.
| YES | NO | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 25 (27%) | 66 (73%) |
|
| 35 (39%) | 56 (61%) |
|
| 31 (33%) | 62 (67%) |
|
| 15(17%) | 74 (83%) |
|
| 19 (22%) | 68 (78%) |
|
| 75 (80%) | 19 (20%) |
|
| 21 (26%) | 70 (74%) |
|
| 60(64%) | 34 (35%) |
F: female; M: male; HDL: High density lipoprotein; TAG: Triglycerides.
Fig 1Higher cholesterol levels correlate with lower recovery rates.
Pearson’s correlation (P = 0.03; R = -0.2).
Fig 2The unrecovered group presents higher total cholesterol levels than recovering group.
Data are represented as mean±SD; significantly different recovery <75% versus recovery >75% (P = 0.0317).
Recovered group vs unrecovered group.
| Variable | Rec > 0.75% | Rec < 75% | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 46.3±18.4 | 48.1±16.0 | 0.6045 |
|
| 1.7±0.1 | 1.7±0.1 | 0.3951 |
|
| 73.1±18.1 | 73.8±13.3 | 0.8407 |
|
| 24.6±4.7 | 25.6±4.3 | 0.4333 |
|
| 117.1±13.8 | 120.3±12.2 | 0.2705 |
|
| 75.0±7.0 | 76.6±5.6 | 0.2953 |
|
| 99.3±35.7 | 92.2±17.5 | 0.8463 |
|
| 171.7±36.8 | 192.8±45.1 | 0.0317* |
|
| 52.4±13.6 | 54.2±15.1 | 0.5606 |
|
| 101.3±33.1 | 114.8±39.0 | 0.1206 |
|
| 90.7±37.6 | 109.2±63.0 | 0.3655 |
|
| 1.1±0.5 | 1.2±0.8 | 0.8377 |
|
| 267.9±63.1 | 248.4±45.4 | 0.2264 |
|
| 41.7±4.7 | 41.7±3.7 | 0.8296 |
|
| 8.0±2.0 | 8.5±2.7 | 0.4955 |
|
| 5.5±1.8 | 5.7±2.4 | 0.9817 |
|
| 2.0±0.9 | 2.2±0.9 | 0.3467 |
|
| 254.3±54.9 | 247.6±60.3 | 0.7051 |
|
| 3.5±3.0 | 4.0±7.7 | 0.6736 |
|
| 158.1±96.5 | 161.0±243.4 | 0.0901 |
|
| 12.3±10.4 | 10.8±9.8 | 0.4881 |
|
| 51.7±20.2 | 57.9±25.1 | 0.3475 |
|
| 22.2±12.0 | 19.6±11.5 | 0.2028 |
|
| 21.9±11.3 | 48.7±24.4 | <0.0001* |
|
| 1.2±0.8 | 0.2±0.3 | <0.0001* |
Clinical characteristics, blood and instrumental parameters of the recovered group and unrecovered group. ad: admission; AE: affected ear; BMI: body mass index; dis: discharge; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HCT: haematocrit; HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; NAE: non affected ear; NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR: platelets to lymphocyte ratio; PT-INR: pro-thrombin international normalised ratio; PTA: pure-tone average; WBC: White blood cells.
Fig 3Absolute hearing threshold at 8 kHz at admission is lower in recovering patients.
Data are represented as mean±SD; significantly different recovery >75% versus recovery <75% (P = 0.002).