Literature DB >> 26207922

Predictive modeling and threshold scores for care seeking among women with urinary incontinence: The short forms of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Urogenital Distress Inventory.

Adam Gafni-Kane1, Ying Zhou2, Sylvia M Botros3.   

Abstract

AIMS: To further the interpretability of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) by (i) evaluating the ability of these measures to distinguish between women with urinary incontinence who do and do not seek care, (ii) defining PFDI-20 and UDI-6 threshold scores above which women with urinary incontinence seek care, and (iii) developing a predictive model for incontinence care seeking.
METHODS: An observational study was conducted with two groups of women with urinary incontinence: 256 who had not sought care and 90 seeking initial care at a tertiary center. Sample sizes were based upon the prevalence of care seeking for urinary incontinence and the number of potential predictors for care seeking. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, receiver operating characteristics, and multivariable logistic regression were use to achieve the study aims.
RESULTS: Women with urinary incontinence who sought care had higher median PFDI-20 and UDI-6 scores compared to non-care seekers (73.96 vs. 16.67, P < 0.0001, and 41.67 vs. 8.33, P < 0.0001). A PFDI-20 score of 33.33 (83.33% sensitivity and 79.30% specificity) had very good discriminatory accuracy in distinguishing care and non-care seekers (AUC 0.886 ± 0.019 [95%CI 0.8518, 0.9254] P < 0.0001). A UDI-6 score of 25.00 (83.33% sensitivity and 83.59% specificity) had excellent discriminatory accuracy in distinguishing care and non-care seekers (AUC 0.9025 ± 0.0190 [95%CI 0.8653, 0.9398] P < 0.0001). A multivariable predictive model accurately identified 82.4% of care and non-care seekers.
CONCLUSIONS: A PFDI-20 score of 33.33 and UDI-6 score of 25.00 provide meaningful benchmarks for care seeking among women with urinary incontinence. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:949-954, 2016.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health care seeking behavior; lower urinary tract symptoms; quality of life; questionnaires; urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26207922     DOI: 10.1002/nau.22833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  5 in total

1.  Patient-Provider Discussions About Urinary Incontinence Among Older Women.

Authors:  Giulia I Lane; Kaitlin Hagan; Elisabeth Erekson; Vatche A Minassian; Francine Grodstein; Julie Bynum
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Evaluation of an accelerometer-based digital health system for the treatment of female urinary incontinence: A pilot study.

Authors:  Peter Rosenblatt; Jessica McKinney; Robert A Rosenberg; Raymon J Iglesias; Robin C Sutherland; Samantha J Pulliam
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  Identification of the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 cutoff scores in urinary incontinent women.

Authors:  Katarzyna Skorupska; Magdalena Emilia Grzybowska; Agnieszka Kubik-Komar; Tomasz Rechberger; Pawel Miotla
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Comparison of pelvic floor dysfunction 6 years after uncomplicated vaginal versus elective cesarean deliveries: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  David Baud; Joanna Sichitiu; Valeria Lombardi; Maud De Rham; Sylvain Meyer; Yvan Vial; Chahin Achtari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Female Urinary Incontinence Evidence-Based Treatment Pathway: An Infographic for Shared Decision-Making.

Authors:  Jessica L McKinney; Laura E Keyser; Samantha J Pulliam; Tanaz R Ferzandi
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 2.681

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.