| Literature DB >> 26207612 |
Yue Zhang1, Ying Sun1, Guixia Ding1, Songming Huang1, Aihua Zhang1, Zhanjun Jia1.
Abstract
Ureteral obstruction with subsequent hydronephrosis is a common clinical complication. Downregulation of renal sodium transporters in obstructed kidneys could contribute to impaired urinary concentrating capability and salt waste following the release of a ureteral obstruction. The current study was undertaken to investigate the role of mitochondrial complex-1 inhibition in modulating sodium transporters in obstructive kidney disease. Following unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) for 7 days, a global reduction of sodium transporters, including NHE3, α-Na-K-ATPase, NCC, NKCC2, p-NKCC2, ENaCα, and ENaCγ, was observed, as determined via qRT-PCR and/or Western blotting. Interestingly, inhibition of mitochondrial complex-1 by rotenone markedly reversed the downregulation of NKCC2, p-NKCC2, and ENaCα. In contrast, other sodium transporters were not affected by rotenone. To study the potential mechanisms involved in mediating the effects of rotenone on sodium transporters, we examined a number of known sodium modulators, including PGE2, ET1, Ang II, natriuretic peptides (ANP, BNP, and CNP), and nitric oxide synthases (iNOS, nNOS, and eNOS). Importantly, among these modulators, only BNP and iNOS were significantly reduced by rotenone treatment. Collectively, these findings demonstrated a substantial role of mitochondrial dysfunction in mediating the downregulation of NKCC2 and ENaCα in obstructive kidney disease, possibly via iNOS-derived nitric oxide and BNP.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26207612 PMCID: PMC4513566 DOI: 10.1038/srep12480
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1mRNA expression of sodium transporters in obstructed kidneys following rotenone treatment.
(A) qRT-PCR analysis of NHE3. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of NCC. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of α-Na-K-ATPase. (D) qRT-PCR analysis of NKCC2. (E) qRT-PCR analysis of ENaCα. (F) qRT-PCR analysis of ENaCβ. (G) qRT-PCR analysis of ENaCγ. The presented data are means ± SE. N = 5 in each group.
Figure 2Protein expression of total NKCC2 and p-NKCC2 in obstructed kidneys following rotenone treatment.
(A) Immunohistochemistry of NKCC2. (B) Western blot analysis of NKCC2 and p-NKCC2. (C) Densitometric analysis of NKCC2. (D) Densitometric analysis of p-NKCC2 normalized by β-actin. (E) Densitometric analysis of p-NKCC2 normalized by total NKCC2. The presented data are means ± SE. N = 4–5 in each group.
Figure 3Protein expression of ENaCα in obstructed kidneys following rotenone treatment.
(A) Immunohistochemistry of ENaCα. (B) Western blot analysis of ENaCα. (C) Densitometric analysis of ENaCα. The presented data are means ± SE. N = 4–5 in each group.
Figure 4Protein expression of ENaCβ and ENaCγ in obstructed kidneys following rotenone treatment.
(A) Western blot analysis of ENaCβ and ENaCγ. (B) Densitometric analysis of ENaCβ. (C) Densitometric analysis of ENaCγ (85 kDa). (D) Densitometric analysis of ENaCγ (70 kDa). The presented data are means ± SE. N = 4–5 in each group.
Figure 5Protein expression of NHE3 and α-Na-K-ATPase in obstructed kidneys following rotenone treatment.
(A) Western blot analysis of NHE3 and α-Na-K-ATPase. (B) Densitometric analysis of NHE3. (C) Densitometric analysis of α-Na-K-ATPase. The presented data are means ± SE. N = 4–5 in each group.
Figure 6Kidney contents of PGE2 and Ang II and mRNA expression of AGT and ET1 in obstructed kidneys following rotenone treatment.
(A) Kidney content of PGE2 determined via EIA. (B) Kidney content of Ang II determined via ELISA. (C) mRNA expression of AGT determined via qRT-PCR. (D) mRNA expression of ET1 determined via qRT-PCR. The presented data are means ± SE. N = 5 in each group.
Figure 7mRNA expression of natriuretic peptides in obstructed kidneys following rotenone treatment.
(A) qRT-PCR analysis of ANP. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of BNP. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of CNP. The presented data are means ± SE. N = 5 in each group.
Figure 8mRNA expression of nitric oxide synthases in obstructed kidneys following rotenone treatment.
(A) qRT-PCR analysis of iNOS. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of eNOS. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of nNOS. The presented data are means ± SE. N = 5 in each group.
Sequences of Primers for real-time PCR.
| GAPDH | 5′-gtcttcactaccatggagaagg-3′ | M32599 |
| 5′-tcatggatgaccttggccag-3′ | ||
| EnaCα | 5′-gcttcatctttacctgtcgtttc-3′ | NM_011324 |
| 5′-ccagagattggagttgttcttgt-3′ | ||
| ENaCβ | 5′-cagtggggagtcttcatcc-3′ | NM_011325 |
| 5′-tcctggtggtgttgctgt-3′ | ||
| EnaCγ | 5′-ctgcttcttcgatgggatg-3′ | NM_011326 |
| 5′-gacaccaggaaggggttgt-3′ | ||
| NCC | 5′-gacaggcaccaacagtgaga-3′ | U61085 |
| 5′-tagagatggcggagatggag-3′ | ||
| NKCC2 | 5′-gctcttcattcgcctctcct-3′ | NM_011389 |
| 5′-agcctattgacccaccgaac-3′ | ||
| NHE3 | 5′-ctgaggaggaaccgagca-3′ | XM_993032 |
| 5′-aggcccagaacgatgagtag-3′ | ||
| Α-Na-K-ATPase | 5′-tgctctcttctctttctagtctcc-3′ | NM_144900 |
| 5′-gctcatccatatccctttcc -3′ | ||
| Nnos | 5′-cagccaaagcagagatgaaa-3′ | D14552 |
| 5′-atacgggttgttgaggacca-3′ | ||
| iNOS | 5′-actgtgtgcctggaggttct-3′ | NM_010927 |
| 5′-tctctgcctatccgtctcgt-3′ | ||
| eNOS | 5′-gagagcgagctggtgtttg-3′ | NM_008713 |
| 5′-tgatggctgaacgaagattg-3′ | ||
| ANP | 5′-ccgatagatctgccctcttg-3′ | NM_008725 |
| 5′-atcgactgccttttcctcct-3′ | ||
| BNP | 5′-cctcacaaaagaacacccaaa-3′ | NM_008726 |
| 5′-ggaaagagacccaggcaga-3′ | ||
| CNP | 5′-tacaaaggcggcaacaaga-3′ | NM_010933 |
| 5′-agatgctggaggctgatgac-3′ | ||
| AGT | 5′-tgtgacagggtggaagatga-3′ | NM_007428 |
| 5′-agatcatgggcacagacacc-3′ | ||
| ET1 | 5′-cgctgttcctgttcttcctt-3′ | NM_010104 |
| 5′-ctggtctgtggccttattgg-3′ |