Literature DB >> 26206690

In vitro activity of tedizolid against gram-positive bacteria in patients with skin and skin structure infections and hospital-acquired pneumonia: a Korean multicenter study.

Yangsoon Lee1, Sung Kuk Hong2, Sunghak Choi3, Weonbin Im3, Dongeun Yong2, Kyungwon Lee4.   

Abstract

We compared the activities of tedizolid to those of linezolid and other commonly used antimicrobial agents against gram-positive cocci recovered from patients with skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in Korean hospitals. Gram-positive isolates were collected from 356 patients with SSSIs and 144 patients with HAP at eight hospitals in Korea from 2011 to 2014. SSSIs included impetigo, cellulitis, erysipelas, furuncles, abscesses, and infected burns. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by using the CLSI agar dilution method. All of the gram-positive isolates were inhibited by ≤1 μg/mL tedizolid. The minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC]₉₀ of tedizolid was 0.5 μg/mL for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, which was 4-fold lower than that of linezolid. Tedizolid may become a useful option for the treatment of SSSIs and HAP caused by gram-positive bacteria.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gram-positive bacteria; Infection; Pneumonia; Skin; Soft tissue; Tedizolid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26206690      PMCID: PMC4510506          DOI: 10.3343/alm.2015.35.5.523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Lab Med        ISSN: 2234-3806            Impact factor:   3.464


Skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs) are common problems in both inpatients and outpatients. The vast majority of SSSIs are caused by gram-positive organisms that are normal flora on the skin of human beings. Staphylococci and streptococci cause majority of gram-positive infections [1]. A recent increase in staphylococcal infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has resulted in a significant increase of cases of MRSA pneumonia in the health care setting, especially in the chronically ill population [2]. Vancomycin has been the cornerstone of treatment for MRSA infections. However, recently, vancomycin-resistant S. aureus and linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus strains have emerged [345]. These strains pose significant challenges to the clinical treatment of infections caused by these organisms. Tedizolid offers broad in vitro activity against gram-positive pathogens, including MRSA and strains resistant to vancomycin or linezolid, and has greater potency than other drugs of its class [67]. It was specifically designed to be active against linezolid-resistant S. aureus, including strains containing the multidrug-resistant cfr gene [8]. Tedizolid phosphate was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to treat patients with acute bacterial SSSI caused by S. aureus, various Streptococcus species, and Enterococcus. In addition, planned studies will investigate the potential role of tedizolid in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) [9]. We published a previous report focusing on the activity of tedizolid against collections of clinical isolates in a single institution, but it was not characterized by infection type [10]. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the activities of tedizolid to those of linezolid and other commonly used antimicrobial agents against gram-positive cocci recovered from patients with SSSIs and HAP in Korean hospitals. Non-duplicated aerobic and anaerobic gram-positive isolates were collected from clinical specimens of 356 patients with SSSIs and 144 patients with HAP at eight hospitals in Seoul and Gyeonggi province, Korea from 2011 to 2014. SSSIs included impetigo, cellulitis, erysipelas, furuncles, abscesses, and infected burns [111]. HAP was defined as pneumonia that occurred 48 hr or more after admission. Species were identified by using conventional methods or the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etolile, France). Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by using the CLSI agar dilution method [1213]. Mueller-Hinton agar was used as a growth medium (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, MD, USA) for testing Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp.: Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood for Streptococcus spp.; Brucella agar (Becton Dickinson) supplemented with 5 µg/mL hemin, 1 µg/mL vitamin K1; and 5% laked sheep blood for anaerobic bacteria. Tedizolid and linezolid (Dong-A ST, Seoul, Korea); erythromycin, tetracycline, oxacillin and penicillin G (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO, USA); piperacillin and tazobactam (Yuhan, Seoul, Korea); clindamycin (Korea Upjohn, Seoul, Korea); levofloxacin (Daiichi Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan); cefotetan (Daiichi Pharmaceutical); ampicillin and gentamicin (Chong Kun Dang, Seoul, Korea); cefoxitin and imipenem (Merck Sharp & Dohme, Rahway, NJ, USA); meropenem (Sumitomo, Tokyo, Japan); metronidazole (ChoongWae, Seoul, Korea); trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (Dong Wha, Seoul, Korea); vancomycin (Daewoong, Seoul, Korea); and teicoplanin (Sanofi Aventis, Bridgewater, NJ, USA) were used as antimicrobial powders. American type culture collection strains of S. aureus (ATCC29213), E. faecalis (ATCC 29212), S. pneumoniae (ATCC 49619), Bacteroides fragilis (ATCC 25285), and B. thetaiotaomicron (ATCC 29741) were used as reference strains. The non-meningeal breakpoints of penicillin G and cefotaxime were used for S. pneumoniae. This study used the breakpoints of tedizolid suggested by the US Food and Drug Administration [14]. All of the aerobic and anaerobic gram-positive isolates in patients with SSSIs were inhibited by ≤1 µg/mL tedizolid (Table 1). The most potent drugs against MRSA were tedizolid (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC]90=0.5 µg/mL), linezolid (MIC90=2 µg/mL), and vancomycin (MIC90=2 µg/mL). The MIC range of tedizolid was 0.125 to 0.5 µg/mL for MRSA, while that of linezolid was 0.25 to 4 µg/mL. The MIC90s of tedizolid were 0.5 µg/mL for both MRSA and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and ≤0.125 µg/mL for coagulase-negative staphylococci, which were 2- to 4-fold lower than those of linezolid. These MIC values were similar to those described in previous reports [1015]. The MICs of tedizolid were 0.25 µg/mL for all three vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus isolates.
Table 1

Comparative in vitro activities of tedizolid and other antimicrobial agents against bacteria recovered from patients with skin and skin structure infections

Organism (N of isolates) and antimicrobial agentsBreakpoint (µg/mL)MIC (µg/mL)Susceptibility (%)
SIRRange50%90%SIR
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (90)
 Tedizolid*≤ 0.51≥20.125-0.50.50.510000
 Linezolid≤4-≥80.25-422100NA0
 Erythromycin≤ 0.51-4≥80.5- > 128> 128> 12828072
 Clindamycin≤ 0.51-2≥4≤ 0.06- > 128> 128> 12844056
 Cotrimoxazole≤2-≥4≤ 0.06-32≤ 0.060.12598NA2
 Gentamicin≤48≥ 160.125- > 1280.53258141
 Levofloxacin≤12≥40.25- > 12816> 12837063
 Tetracycline≤48≥ 160.5- > 128646441059
 Oxacillin≤2-≥48- > 128> 128> 1280NA100
 Vancomycin≤24-8≥ 161-4129460
Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (90)
 Tedizolid≤ 0.51≥2≤ 0.06-0.50.250.510000
 Linezolid≤4-≥80.25-222100NA0
 Erythromycin≤ 0.51-4≥80.25- > 1280.5> 12874124
 Clindamycin≤ 0.51-2≥4≤ 0.06- > 1280.1250.1259901
 Cotrimoxazole≤2-≥4≤ 0.06-0.125≤ 0.060.125100NA0
 Gentamicin≤48≥ 160.125-1280.253282117
 Levofloxacin≤12≥40.125-320.25329703
 Tetracycline≤48≥ 160.25-1280.50.59109
 Oxacillin≤2-≥4≤ 0.06-20.50.5100NA0
 Vancomycin≤24-8≥ 161-21110000
Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (24)
 TedizolidNANANA≤ 0.06-0.250.1250.125NANANA
 Linezolid≤4-≥80.25-20.250.25100NA0
 Erythromycin≤ 0.51-4≥8≤ 0.06- > 1280.12512871029
 Clindamycin≤ 0.51-2≥4≤ 0.06- > 128≤ 0.060.1259604
 Cotrimoxazole≤2-≥4≤ 0.06-4≤ 0.06479NA21
 Gentamicin≤48≥ 16≤ 0.06-1280.12516502129
 Levofloxacin≤12≥4≤ 0.06-1280.25875421
 Tetracycline≤48≥ 160.125-1280.256475025
 Oxacillin≤ 0.25-≥ 0.50.125-1280.5238NA63
 Vancomycin≤48-16≥ 321-22210000
Streptococcus pneumoniae (30)
 TedizolidNANANA0.25-10.250.5NANANA
 Linezolid≤2--1-212100NANA
 Penicillin G≤24≥80.06-44427730
 Cefotaxime≤12≥40.06-22227730
 Clindamycin≤ 0.250.5≥10.125- > 128> 128> 12810090
 Erythromycin≤ 0.250.5≥18- > 128> 128> 12800100
 Cotrimoxazole≤ 0.51-2≥40.5- > 128326413087
 Levofloxacin≤24≥82-82487103
 Tetracycline≤12≥40.25-6432323393
S. agalactiae (22)
 Tedizolid≤ 0.5--0.25-0.50.50.5100NANA
 Linezolid≤2--2-42296NANA
 Penicillin G≤ 0.12--0.015-0.060.060.06100NANA
 Cefotaxime≤ 0.5--0.015-0.060.060.06100NANA
 Clindamycin≤ 0.250.5≥10.125- > 1280.125> 12882018
 Erythromycin≤ 0.250.5≥10.125- > 1280.25> 12877023
 Levofloxacin≤24≥81-6426459932
 Tetracycline≤24≥80.25-3213259041
S. pyogenes (8)
 Tedizolid≤ 0.5--0.125-0.5NANANANANA
 Linezolid≤2--1-2NANANANANA
 Penicillin G≤ 0.12--0.015NANANANANA
 Cefotaxime≤ 0.5--0.015-0.06NANANANANA
 Clindamycin≤ 0.250.5≥10.125- > 128NANANANANA
 Erythromycin≤ 0.250.5≥10.25-32NANANANANA
 Levofloxacin≤24≥80.5-8NANANANANA
 Tetracycline≤24≥80.25-8NANANANANA
Enterococcus faecalis (14)
 Tedizolid≤ 0.5--0.25-0.50.50.5100NANA
 Linezolid≤24≥81-22210000
 Ampicillin≤8-≥ 160.5-414100NA0
 Erythromycin≤ 0.51-4≥80.5- > 128> 128> 12803664
 Levofloxacin≤24≥81- > 128112864036
 Tetracycline≤48≥ 160.5- > 1286412814086
 Teicoplanin≤816≥ 32≤ 0.06-10.5110000
 Vancomycin≤48-16≥ 320.5-41210000
E. faecium (16)
 TedizolidNANANA0.25-0.50.250.25NANANA
 Linezolid≤24≥80.5-22210000
 Ampicillin≤8-≥ 1616- > 128641280NA100
 Erythromycin≤ 0.51-4≥8≤ 0.06- > 128> 128> 1286094
 Levofloxacin≤24≥832-12812812800100
 Tetracycline≤48≥ 160.25-1280.512856044
 Vancomycin≤48-16≥ 321- > 1281> 12856044
 Teicoplanin≤816≥ 320.25-128132561925
Viridans group Streptococcus spp. (10)
 TedizolidNANANA0.25-0.50.250.25NANANA
 Linezolid≤2--1-212100NANA
 Penicillin G≤ 0.120.25-2≥40.03-20.060.570100
 Cefotaxime≤12≥40.06-20.25190100
 Clindamycin≤ 0.250.5≥1≤ 0.06- > 1280.125> 12860040
 Erythromycin≤ 0.250.5≥1≤ 0.06- > 1280.125128501040
 Levofloxacin≤24≥80.5-21210000
 Tetracycline≤24≥80.25-64166440060
Finegoldia magna (21)
 TedizolidNANANA0.06-10.250.5NANANA
 LinezolidNANANA0.5-222NANANA
 Piperacillin≤ 3264≥ 128≤ 0.06-0.250.1250.2510000
 Pip/tazobactam≤ 3264≥ 128≤ 0.06-0.25≤ 0.060.12510000
 Cefoxitin≤ 1632≥ 640.125-21110000
 Cefotetan≤ 1632≥ 640.25-21210000
 Imipenem≤48≥ 16≤ 0.06-0.125≤ 0.060.12510000
 Clindamycin≤24≥8≤ 0.06- > 1282> 12855936
 Metronidazole≤816≥ 320.25-41210000
 VancomycinNANANA0.25-10.250.5NANANA
Peptostreptococcus spp. (27)§
 TedizolidNANANA≤ 0.06-0.250.1250.25NANANA
 LinezolidNANANA0.5-212NANANA
 Piperacillin≤ 3264≥ 128≤ 0.06-1≤ 0.06110000
 Pip/tazobactam≤ 3264≥ 128≤ 0.06-1≤ 0.060.2510000
 Cefoxitin≤ 1632≥ 64≤ 0.06-80.5410000
 Cefotetan≤ 1632≥ 640.125-80.5210000
 Imipenem≤48≥ 16≤ 0.06-0.5≤ 0.060.12510000
 Clindamycin≤24≥8≤ 0.06-1280.2512874422
 Metronidazole≤816≥ 320.5-21210000
 VancomycinNANANA0.125-10.251NANANA
Clostridium spp. (4)
 TedizolidNANANA0.25-0.5NANANANANA
 LinezolidNANANA2-4NANANANANA
 Piperacillin≤ 3264≥ 1280.25-2NANANANANA
 Pip/tazobactam≤ 3264≥ 1280.125-2NANANANANA
 Cefoxitin≤ 1632≥ 644-32NANANANANA
 Cefotetan≤ 1632≥ 640.25-2NANANANANA
 Imipenem≤48≥ 160.25-2NANANANANA
 Clindamycin≤24≥80.125- > 128NANANANANA
 Metronidazole≤816≥ 320.5-8NANANANANA
 VancomycinNANANA0.5-4NANANANANA

*FDA breakpoints were used for tedizolid; †Staphylococcus epidermidis (N=22), S. caprae (N=1), S. warneri (N=1); ‡Streptococcus mitis (N=6), S. anginosus (N=2), S. constellatus (N=2); §P. asaccharolyticus (N=11), P. micros (N=7), Anaerococcus prevotii (N=8), P. anaerobius (N=1); ∥C. perfringens (N=2), C. ramosum (N=2).

Abbreviations: MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant; NA, not available/applicable; Pip/tazobactam, piperacillin/tazobactam.

The MIC ranges of tedizolid were 0.25 to 0.5 µg/mL for Enterococcus, while those of linezolid were 0.5 to 2 µg/mL. Tedizolid inhibited all vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus at 0.5 µg/mL. When the meningeal breakpoint was applied, most of the pneumococcal isolates tested were not susceptible to penicillin G or cefotaxime. However, the MIC range of tedizolid was 0.25 to 1 µg/mL, and the MIC90 (0.5 µg/mL) was 4-fold lower than that of linezolid. Tedizolid inhibited all the isolates of viridans Streptococcus spp. and β-hemolytic streptococci such as S. pyogenes and S. agalactiae at 0.5 µg/mL. Tedizolid had excellent activity against gram-positive anaerobes recovered from SSSIs (Table 1). The MIC ranges of tedizolid were 0.06 to 1 µg/mL for Finegoldia magna and ≤0.06 to 0.25 µg/mL for the other Peptostreptococcus spp. The MIC90 values for these organisms were 0.5 and 0.25 µg/mL, respectively, which were 4-8 fold lower than those of linezolid. All the Clostridium spp. isolates were inhibited by tedizolid at 0.5 µg/mL. All the gram-positive isolates in patients with HAP were inhibited by ≤0.5 µg/mL tedizolid (Table 2). The MIC ranges of tedizolid were 0.125 to 0.5 µg/mL for MRSA and 0.25 µg/mL for MSSA. The MIC90 values of tedizolid were 0.25, 0.5, and 0.5 µg/mL for MSSA, MRSA, and pneumococci, respectively, which were 4- to 8-fold lower than those of linezolid.
Table 2

Comparative in vitro activities of tedizolid and other antimicrobial agents against bacteria recovered from patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia

Organism (N of isolates) and antimicrobial agentsBreakpoint (µg/mL)MIC (µg/mL)Susceptibility (%)
SIRRange50%90%SIR
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (61)
 Tedizolid*≤0.51≥20.125-0.50.250.510000
 Linezolid≤4-≥81-222100NA0
 Erythromycin≤0.51-4≥80.25- > 128> 128> 12810090
 Clindamycin≤0.51-2≥4≤0.06- > 128> 128> 12823077
 Cotrimoxazole≤2-≥4≤0.06-4≤0.060.12598NA2
 Gentamicin≤48≥160.125-128326438062
 Levofloxacin≤12≥40.25- > 128323216084
 Tetracycline≤48≥160.25-12812812818082
 Oxacillin≤2-≥432- > 128> 128> 1280NA100
 Vancomycin≤24-8≥160.5-21210000
Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (28)
 Tedizolid≤0.51≥20.25-0.250.250.2510000
 Linezolid≤4-≥81-222100NA0
 Erythromycin≤0.51-4≥80.25- > 1280.250.259344
 Clindamycin≤0.51-2≥4≤0.06-64≤0.06≤0.069344
 Cotrimoxazole≤2-≥4≤0.06-0.25≤0.06≤0.06100NA0
 Gentamicin≤48≥160.125-160.250.259604
 Levofloxacin≤12≥40.125-80.2519307
 Tetracycline≤48≥160.25-0.250.250.2510000
 Oxacillin≤2-≥40.125-0.50.250.5100NA0
 Vancomycin≤24-8≥161-21110000
S. epidermidis (8)
 TedizolidNANANA≤0.06NANANANANA
 Linezolid≤4-≥80.25NANANANANA
 Erythromycin≤0.51-4≥8≤0.06-128NANANANANA
 Clindamycin≤0.51-2≥4≤0.06- > 128NANANANANA
 Cotrimoxazole≤2-≥4≤0.06-4NANANANANA
 Gentamicin≤48≥16≤0.06-128NANANANANA
 Levofloxacin≤12≥44-128NANANANANA
 Tetracycline≤48≥160.125-32NANANANANA
 Oxacillin≤0.25-≥0.50.5-32NANANANANA
 Vancomycin≤48-16≥321-2NANANANANA
Streptococcus pneumoniae (47)
 TedizolidNANANA0.25-0.50.250.5NANANA
 Linezolid≤2--1-212100NANA
 Penicillin G≤24≥80.015-828492823
 Cefotaxime≤12≥40.015-32132552619
 Clindamycin≤0.250.5≥10.125- > 128> 128> 12815085
 Erythromycin≤0.250.5≥10.25- > 128> 128> 1286094
 Cotrimoxazole≤0.51-2≥41-32832231562
 Levofloxacin≤24≥82-12823272226
 Tetracycline≤12≥40.25-128326413087

*FDA breakpoints were used for tedizolid.

Abbreviations: MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant; NA, not available/applicable; Pip/tazobactam, piperacillin/tazobactam.

In summary, the MIC values of tedizolid in this study were not significantly different according to type of infection. All organisms tested were susceptible to tedizolid, nevertheless the breakpoint of tedizolid is 4- or 8-fold lower than that of linezolid. Tedizolid is a potent agent with high in vitro activity against common aerobic and anaerobic gram-positive pathogens in SSSIs and HAP. Tedizolid may become a useful option for the treatment of SSSIs and HAP.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Skin and soft-tissue infections: classifying and treating a spectrum.

Authors:  Sabitha Rajan
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.321

2.  In vitro activity of tedizolid (TR-700) against linezolid-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  Iciar Rodríguez-Avial; Esther Culebras; Carmen Betriu; Gracia Morales; Irene Pena; Juan J Picazo
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 3.  Tedizolid: a new oxazolidinone antimicrobial.

Authors:  Jamie J Kisgen; Hanine Mansour; Nathan R Unger; Lindsey M Childs
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 4.  Antianaerobic antimicrobials: spectrum and susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Itzhak Brook; Hannah M Wexler; Ellie J C Goldstein
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Update on the global number of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) strains.

Authors:  Zahra Moravvej; Fatemeh Estaji; Emran Askari; Kavous Solhjou; Mahboobeh Naderi Nasab; Sareh Saadat
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 6.  Pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Ethan Rubinstein; Marin H Kollef; Dilip Nathwani
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Comparative in vitro activities of torezolid (DA-7157) against clinical isolates of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in South Korea.

Authors:  Jong Hwa Yum; Sung Hak Choi; Dongeun Yong; Yunsop Chong; Weon Bin Im; Dong-Kwon Rhee; Kyungwon Lee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Clinical efficacy and correlation of clinical outcomes with in vitro susceptibility for anaerobic bacteria in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections treated with moxifloxacin.

Authors:  Ellie J C Goldstein; Joseph S Solomkin; Diane M Citron; Jeffrey D Alder
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  In vitro activity of TR-700, the antibacterial moiety of the prodrug TR-701, against linezolid-resistant strains.

Authors:  K J Shaw; S Poppe; R Schaadt; V Brown-Driver; J Finn; C M Pillar; D Shinabarger; G Zurenko
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Activity of tedizolid (TR-700) against well-characterized methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains of diverse epidemiological origins.

Authors:  Kenneth S Thomson; Richard V Goering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  11 in total

1.  Activities of Tedizolid and Linezolid Determined by the Reference Broth Microdilution Method against 3,032 Gram-Positive Bacterial Isolates Collected in Asia-Pacific, Eastern Europe, and Latin American Countries in 2014.

Authors:  Michael A Pfaller; Robert K Flamm; Ronald N Jones; David J Farrell; Rodrigo E Mendes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Antimicrobial Therapy in Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Children.

Authors:  Samriti Gupta; Rakesh Lodha; S K Kabra
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid Compared to Linezolid and Five Other Antimicrobial Agents against 332 Anaerobic Isolates, Including Bacteroides fragilis Group, Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Veillonella Species.

Authors:  Ellie J C Goldstein; C Vreni Merriam; Diane M Citron
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vitro activity of tedizolid against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae collected in 2013 and 2014 from sites in Latin American countries, Australia, New Zealand, and China.

Authors:  D J Biedenbach; S K Bouchillon; B Johnson; J Alder; D F Sahm
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  What's new in multidrug-resistant pathogens in the ICU?

Authors:  Gabor Zilahi; Antonio Artigas; Ignacio Martin-Loeches
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 6.  Critical role of tedizolid in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  Olivia Ferrández; Olatz Urbina; Santiago Grau
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.162

7.  Tedizolid phosphate for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Nadia Castaldo; Alessia Carnelutti; Maddalena Peghin; Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2019-07-05

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Tedizolid.

Authors:  Khalid Iqbal; Aliki Milioudi; Sebastian Georg Wicha
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Antibacterial activity of recently approved antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fei Liu; Sajad Rajabi; Chunhua Shi; Ghazale Afifirad; Nazanin Omidi; Ebrahim Kouhsari; Saeed Khoshnood; Khalil Azizian
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.781

10.  Serotype Distribution and Antimicrobial Resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates Causing Invasive and Noninvasive Pneumococcal Diseases in Korea from 2008 to 2014.

Authors:  Si Hyun Kim; Il Kwon Bae; Dongchul Park; Kyungmin Lee; Na Young Kim; Sae Am Song; Hye Ran Kim; Ga Won Jeon; Sang-Hwa Urm; Jeong Hwan Shin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.