Björn Alexander Blomberg1, Anders Thomassen2, Pim A de Jong3, Jane A Simonsen2, Marnix G E H Lam3, Anne L Nielsen2, Hans Mickley4, Willem P T M Mali3, Abass Alavi5, Poul F Høilund-Carlsen6. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands b.a.blomberg@umcutrecht.nl. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. 3. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. 5. Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and. 6. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Sodium 18F-fluoride (18F-NaF) PET/CT imaging is a promising imaging technique for the assessment of atherosclerosis but is hampered by a lack of validated quantification protocols. Both personal characteristics and technical factors can affect quantification of arterial 18F-NaF uptake. This study investigated whether blood activity, renal function, injected dose, circulating time, and PET/CT system affect quantification of arterial 18F-NaF uptake. METHODS: Eighty-nine healthy subjects were prospectively examined by 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging. Arterial 18F-NaF uptake was quantified at the level of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, descending thoracic aorta, and coronary arteries by calculating the maximum 18F-NaF activity (NaFmax), the maximum/mean target-to-background ratio (TBRmax/mean), and the maximum blood-subtracted 18F-NaF activity (bsNaFmax). Multivariable linear regression assessed the effect of personal characteristics and technical factors on quantification of arterial 18F-NaF uptake. RESULTS: NaFmax and TBRmax/mean were dependent on blood activity (β=0.34 to 0.44, P<0.001, and β=-0.68 to -0.58, P<0.001, respectively) and PET/CT system (β=-0.80 to -0.53, P<0.001, and β=-0.80 to -0.23, P<0.031, respectively). bsNaFmax depended on PET/CT system (β=-0.91 to -0.57, P<0.001) but not blood activity. This finding was observed at the level of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, descending thoracic aorta, and the coronary arteries. In addition to blood activity and PET/CT system, injected dose affected quantification of arterial 18F-NaF uptake, whereas renal function and circulating time did not. CONCLUSION: The prospective evaluation of 89 healthy subjects demonstrated that quantification of arterial 18F-NaF uptake is affected by blood activity, injected dose, and PET/CT system. Therefore, blood activity, injected dose, and PET/CT system should be considered to generate accurate estimates of arterial 18F-NaF uptake.
UNLABELLED: Sodium 18F-fluoride (18F-NaF) PET/CT imaging is a promising imaging technique for the assessment of atherosclerosis but is hampered by a lack of validated quantification protocols. Both personal characteristics and technical factors can affect quantification of arterial 18F-NaF uptake. This study investigated whether blood activity, renal function, injected dose, circulating time, and PET/CT system affect quantification of arterial 18F-NaF uptake. METHODS: Eighty-nine healthy subjects were prospectively examined by 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging. Arterial 18F-NaF uptake was quantified at the level of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, descending thoracic aorta, and coronary arteries by calculating the maximum 18F-NaF activity (NaFmax), the maximum/mean target-to-background ratio (TBRmax/mean), and the maximum blood-subtracted 18F-NaF activity (bsNaFmax). Multivariable linear regression assessed the effect of personal characteristics and technical factors on quantification of arterial 18F-NaF uptake. RESULTS:NaFmax and TBRmax/mean were dependent on blood activity (β=0.34 to 0.44, P<0.001, and β=-0.68 to -0.58, P<0.001, respectively) and PET/CT system (β=-0.80 to -0.53, P<0.001, and β=-0.80 to -0.23, P<0.031, respectively). bsNaFmax depended on PET/CT system (β=-0.91 to -0.57, P<0.001) but not blood activity. This finding was observed at the level of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, descending thoracic aorta, and the coronary arteries. In addition to blood activity and PET/CT system, injected dose affected quantification of arterial 18F-NaF uptake, whereas renal function and circulating time did not. CONCLUSION: The prospective evaluation of 89 healthy subjects demonstrated that quantification of arterial 18F-NaF uptake is affected by blood activity, injected dose, and PET/CT system. Therefore, blood activity, injected dose, and PET/CT system should be considered to generate accurate estimates of arterial 18F-NaF uptake.
Authors: William Raynor; Sina Houshmand; Saeid Gholami; Sahra Emamzadehfard; Chamith S Rajapakse; Björn Alexander Blomberg; Thomas J Werner; Poul F Høilund-Carlsen; Joshua F Baker; Abass Alavi Journal: Curr Osteoporos Rep Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 5.096
Authors: Jacek Kwiecinski; Sebastien Cadet; Marwa Daghem; Martin L Lassen; Damini Dey; Marc R Dweck; Daniel S Berman; David E Newby; Piotr J Slomka Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 9.236