Literature DB >> 26205092

Gynecologic age is an important risk factor for obstetric and perinatal outcomes in adolescent pregnancies.

Mustafa Kaplanoglu1, Mehmet Bülbül2, Capan Konca3, Dilek Kaplanoglu4, Mehmet Selcuk Tabak2, Barıs Ata5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adolescent pregnancy is an important public health problem. Physiological maturity affects obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Almost all assessments of adolescent pregnancies are based on chronological age. Gynecologic age (GA) is defined as age in years at conception minus age at menarche and it is an indicator of physiological maturity. AIM: To compare obstetric and perinatal outcomes between adult and adolescent pregnancies as categorized according to GA.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, 233 adolescent pregnant women were divided into two groups based on GA≤3 years (101 women) and GA>3 years (132 women). Their obstetric and perinatal results were compared with 202 adult pregnancies who gave birth in the same period.
FINDINGS: Gestational age at delivery, APGAR scores, birth weight, and incidence of preterm birth, admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), intrauterine growth restriction, low birth weight, and premature rupture of membranes were significantly different between the study groups. Compared to adolescent pregnancies with GA>3 years, adolescent pregnancies with GA≤3 years had significantly lower birth weight, gestational age, APGAR scores, and significantly higher incidence of intrauterine growth restriction, low birth weight and admission to NICU.
CONCLUSION: Low GA is associated with an increased rate of obstetric and perinatal complications in adolescent pregnancies. Although the main aim is the prevention of adolescent pregnancies, a detailed evaluation of such pregnancies including determination of the gynecological age together with a multidisciplinary approach may decrease potential complications.
Copyright © 2015 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent pregnancy; Gynecologic age; Obstetric and preinatal outcomes; Physiological maturity; Risk factor

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26205092     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  6 in total

1.  Prevalence of teenage pregnancy in 2015-2016 and its obstetric outcomes compared to non-teenage pregnancy at Hospital Tuanku Ja'afar Seremban (HTJS), Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia: A retrospective case-control study based on the national obstetric registry.

Authors:  K Nagandla; K Kumar
Journal:  Malays Fam Physician       Date:  2020-07-06

2.  Maternal age at birth and daughter's fecundability.

Authors:  Olga Basso; Sydney K Willis; Elizabeth E Hatch; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Kenneth J Rothman; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Adolescent pregnancy, nutrition, and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: what we know and what we don't know.

Authors:  W Johnson; S E Moore
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Serum Concentration of Leptin in Pregnant Adolescents Correlated with Gestational Weight Gain, Postpartum Weight Retention and Newborn Weight/Length.

Authors:  Reyna Sámano; Hugo Martínez-Rojano; Gabriela Chico-Barba; Estela Godínez-Martínez; Bernarda Sánchez-Jiménez; Diana Montiel-Ojeda; Maricruz Tolentino
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Impacts of early marriage and adolescent pregnancy on mental and somatic health: the role of partner violence.

Authors:  Aysen Ufuk Sezgin; Raija-Leena Punamäki
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kaline Gomes Ferrari Marquart; Thais Valeria Silva; Ben W Mol; José Guilherme Cecatti; Renato Passini; Cynara M Pereira; Thaísa B Guedes; Tatiana F Fanton; Rodolfo C Pacagnella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.