Andrew Meillier1, Shyam Patel1, Abdullah M S Al-Osaimi2. 1. Internal Medicine Residency Program, Department of Medicine, Temple University Health System, 812 Parkinson Pavilion, 3401 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA. 2. Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Temple University Health System, 812 Parkinson Pavilion, 3401 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA. Abdullah.Al-Osaimi@tuhs.temple.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients increasingly use the Internet for educational material concerning health and diseases. This information can be utilized to teach the population of hepatitis B and C if properly written at the necessary grade level of the intended patient population. AIM: We explored the readability of online resources concerning hepatitis B and C. METHODS: Google searches were performed for "Hepatitis B" and "Hepatitis C." The Internet resources that were intended for patient education were used with specific exclusions. Articles were taken from 19 and 23 different websites focusing on the symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatitis B and C, respectively. The articles were analyzed using Readability Studio Professional Edition (Oleander Solutions, Vandalia, OH) using 10 different readability scales. The results were compared and averaged to identify the anticipated academic grade level required to understand the information. RESULTS: The average readability scores of the 10 scales had ranges of 9.7-16.4 for hepatitis B and 9.2-16.4 for hepatitis C. The average academic reading grade level for hepatitis B was 12.6 ± 2.1 and for hepatitis C was 12.7 ± 2.1. There was no significant discrepancy between the hepatitis B and C Internet resource averaged grade levels. CONCLUSION: The resources accessed by patients are higher than the previously determined necessary grade level for patients to properly understand the intended information. The American Medical Association recommends material should be simplified to grade levels below the sixth grade level to benefit the ideal proportion of the patient population.
BACKGROUND:Patients increasingly use the Internet for educational material concerning health and diseases. This information can be utilized to teach the population of hepatitis B and C if properly written at the necessary grade level of the intended patient population. AIM: We explored the readability of online resources concerning hepatitis B and C. METHODS: Google searches were performed for "Hepatitis B" and "Hepatitis C." The Internet resources that were intended for patient education were used with specific exclusions. Articles were taken from 19 and 23 different websites focusing on the symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatitis B and C, respectively. The articles were analyzed using Readability Studio Professional Edition (Oleander Solutions, Vandalia, OH) using 10 different readability scales. The results were compared and averaged to identify the anticipated academic grade level required to understand the information. RESULTS: The average readability scores of the 10 scales had ranges of 9.7-16.4 for hepatitis B and 9.2-16.4 for hepatitis C. The average academic reading grade level for hepatitis B was 12.6 ± 2.1 and for hepatitis C was 12.7 ± 2.1. There was no significant discrepancy between the hepatitis B and C Internet resource averaged grade levels. CONCLUSION: The resources accessed by patients are higher than the previously determined necessary grade level for patients to properly understand the intended information. The American Medical Association recommends material should be simplified to grade levels below the sixth grade level to benefit the ideal proportion of the patient population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health literacy; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis C; Patient education
Authors: David R Hansberry; Tekchand Ramchand; Shyam Patel; Carl Kraus; Jin Jung; Nitin Agarwal; Sharon F Gonzales; Stephen R Baker Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: K Ikeda; S Saitoh; Y Suzuki; M Kobayashi; A Tsubota; I Koida; Y Arase; M Fukuda; K Chayama; N Murashima; H Kumada Journal: J Hepatol Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 25.083