Literature DB >> 26204361

Prediction of Quality of Life and Survival After Surgery for Symptomatic Spinal Metastases: A Multicenter Cohort Study to Determine Suitability for Surgical Treatment.

David Choi1, Zoe Fox, Todd Albert, Mark Arts, Laurent Balabaud, Cody Bunger, Jacob M Buchowski, Maarten H Coppes, Bart Depreitere, Michael G Fehlings, James Harrop, Norio Kawahara, Juan A Martin-Benlloch, Eric M Massicotte, Christian Mazel, Fetullah C Oner, Wilco Peul, Nasir Quraishi, Yasuaki Tokuhashi, Katsuro Tomita, Jorit Jan Verlaan, Michael Wang, H Alan Crockard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases aims to improve quality of life, pain, function, and stability. Complications in the postoperative period are not uncommon; therefore, it is important to select appropriate patients who are likely to benefit the greatest from surgery. Previous studies have focused on predicting survival rather than quality of life after surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To determine preoperative patient characteristics that predict postoperative quality of life and survival in patients who undergo surgery for spinal metastases.
METHODS: In a prospective cohort study of 922 patients with spinal metastases who underwent surgery, we performed preoperative and postoperative assessment of EuroQol EQ-5D quality of life, visual analog score for pain, Karnofsky physical functioning score, complication rates, and survival.
RESULTS: The primary tumor type, number of spinal metastases, and presence of visceral metastases were independent predictors of survival. Predictors of quality of life after surgery included preoperative EQ-5D (P = .002), Frankel score (P < .001), and Karnofsky Performance Status (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Data from the largest prospective surgical series of patients with symptomatic spinal metastases revealed that tumor type, the number of spinal metastases, and the presence of visceral metastases are the most useful predictors of survival and that quality of life is best predicted by preoperative Karnofsky, Frankel, and EQ-5D scores. The Karnofsky score predicts quality of life and survival and is easy to determine at the bedside, unlike the EQ-5D index. Karnofsky score, tumor type, and spinal and visceral metastases should be considered the 4 most important prognostic variables that influence patient management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26204361     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  24 in total

1.  Patient-reported outcomes after surgical stabilization of spinal tumors: symptom-based validation of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) and surgery.

Authors:  Ibrahim Hussain; Ori Barzilai; Anne S Reiner; Natalie DiStefano; Lily McLaughlin; Shahiba Ogilvie; Mark Bilsky; Ilya Laufer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Factors influencing early postoperative complications following surgery for symptomatic spinal metastasis: a single-center series and multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Schuss; Ági Güresir; Matthias Schneider; Markus Velten; Hartmut Vatter; Erdem Güresir
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Non-operative management of spinal metastases: A prognostic model for failure.

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Joseph H Schwab; Marco L Ferrone; Justin A Blucher; Tracy A Balboni; Lauren B Barton; John H Chi; James D Kang; Elena Losina; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 1.876

4.  Reducing kyphotic deformity by posterior vertebral column resection with 360° osteosynthesis in metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC).

Authors:  Marc Dreimann; Michael Hoffmann; Lennart Viezens; Lukas Weiser; Patrick Czorlich; Sven Oliver Eicker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Prognosticating outcomes and survival for patients with lumbar spinal metastases: Results of a bayesian regression analysis.

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Marco L Ferrone; Joseph H Schwab; Justin A Blucher; Lauren B Barton; Mitchel B Harris; James D Kang
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 1.876

6.  Predictive factors of neurological recovery after chronic craniovertebral brainstem compression.

Authors:  Aymeric Amelot; Louis-Marie Terrier; Guillaume Lot
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  The next generation in surgical research for patients with spinal metastases.

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Marco L Ferrone
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Ambulatory status after surgical and nonsurgical treatment for spinal metastasis.

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Elena Losina; Marco L Ferrone; Joseph H Schwab; John H Chi; Justin A Blucher; Genevieve S Silva; Angela T Chen; Mitchel B Harris; James D Kang; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  What Factors are Associated With Quality Of Life, Pain Interference, Anxiety, and Depression in Patients With Metastatic Bone Disease?

Authors:  Q M J van der Vliet; N R Paulino Pereira; S J Janssen; F J Hornicek; M L Ferrone; J A M Bramer; C N van Dijk; J H Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Patient experiences of decision-making in the treatment of spinal metastases: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Emma C Lape; Jeffrey N Katz; Justin A Blucher; Angela T Chen; Genevieve S Silva; Joseph H Schwab; Tracy A Balboni; Elena Losina; Andrew J Schoenfeld
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.