Literature DB >> 26204222

Volumetric parameters changes of sequential 18F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of recurrence and death in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Seong-Jang Kim1, Samuel Chang.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: : The goal of the present study was to determine whether volumetric parameters such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) measured by sequential F-FDG PET/CT imaging could be used as prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who received preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
METHODS: A total 64 patients with LARC patients were included in the current study. All patients were evaluated by F-FDG PET/CT before and after 45 Gy of radiotherapy with concurrent oral capecitabine chemotherapy. Initial, second, and the percent changes ([INCREMENT], %) of semiquantitative and volumetric parameters were used to calculate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The cutoff values of semiquantitative and volumetric parameters were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The prognostic significance was assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.
RESULTS: For RFS, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (χ = 10.7, P = 0.002), surgical margin (+) (χ = 3.39, P = 0.037), lymphatic invasion (+) (χ = 6.8, P = 0.0078), RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) (χ = 46.3, P < 0.0001), SUVmax1 (χ = 10.1, P = 0.025), ΔSUVmax (χ = 20.4, P < 0.0001), ΔSUVmean (χ = 28.8, P < 0.0001), MTV1 (χ = 24.1, P < 0.0001), ΔMTV (χ = 27.4, P < 0.0001), TLG1 (χ = 21.9, P < 0.0001), TLG2 (χ = 23.3, P < 0.0001), and ΔTLG (χ = 55.6, P < 0.0001) are associated prognostic factors. For OS, AJCC stage (χ = 6.0, P = 0.021), surgical margin (+) (χ = 3.2, P = 0.042), lymphatic invasion (+) (χ = 3.8, P = 0.048), RECIST (χ = 10.4, P = 0.0015), ΔSUVmax (χ = 6.0, P = 0.013), ΔSUVmean (χ = 10.5, P = 0.0009), MTV1 (χ = 14.5, P = 0.0008), ΔMTV (χ = 14.7, P = 0.0002), TLG1 (χ = 15.8, P = 0.0002), TLG2 (χ = 13.5, P = 0.0006), and ΔTLG (χ = 17.5, P < 0.0001) are potent predictors. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses revealed that the initial MTV (MTV1) and ΔTLG were the potent predictors for RFS and OS.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that MTV on initial pretreatment F-FDG PET/CT and ΔTLG of sequential F-FDG PET/CT after preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy in LARC patients could provide prognostic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26204222     DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0363-9762            Impact factor:   7.794


  8 in total

1.  PET/CT-Based Response Evaluation in Cancer-a Systematic Review of Design Issues.

Authors:  Oke Gerke; Karen Ehlers; Edith Motschall; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Werner Vach
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT with texture analysis in patients with rectal cancer treated by surgery.

Authors:  Masatoshi Hotta; Ryogo Minamimoto; Yoshimasa Gohda; Kenta Miwa; Kensuke Otani; Tomomichi Kiyomatsu; Hideaki Yano
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.668

3.  FDG PET/CT radiomics for predicting the outcome of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pierre Lovinfosse; Marc Polus; Daniel Van Daele; Philippe Martinive; Frédéric Daenen; Mathieu Hatt; Dimitris Visvikis; Benjamin Koopmansch; Frédéric Lambert; Carla Coimbra; Laurence Seidel; Adelin Albert; Philippe Delvenne; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Lymph Nodes Evaluation in Rectal Cancer: Where Do We Stand and Future Perspective.

Authors:  Alessandra Borgheresi; Federica De Muzio; Andrea Agostini; Letizia Ottaviani; Alessandra Bruno; Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Ginevra Danti; Federica Flammia; Roberta Grassi; Francesca Grassi; Federico Bruno; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Antonio Barile; Vittorio Miele; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Prognostic utility of serial 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent tri-modality treatment.

Authors:  Sumal Fernando; Michael Lin; Trang Thanh Pham; Shanley Chong; Emilia Ip; Karen Wong; Wei Chua; Weng Ng; Peter Lin; Stephanie Lim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Predictive Value of [18F]FDG PET/CT for Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Sung Hoon Kim; Bong-Il Song; Beong Woo Kim; Hae Won Kim; Kyoung Sook Won; Sung Uk Bae; Woon Kyung Jeong; Seong Kyu Baek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Prognostic Impact of Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) from Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in Stage II/III Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: Extending the Value of PET/CT for Resectable Disease.

Authors:  Sea-Won Lee; Hye Lim Park; Nara Yoon; Ji Hoon Kim; Jin Kyoung Oh; Jae Ho Buyn; Eun Kyoung Choi; Ji Hyung Hong
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  FDG-PET/CT in colorectal cancer: potential for vascular-metabolic imaging to provide markers of prognosis.

Authors:  Shih-Hsin Chen; Kenneth Miles; Stuart A Taylor; Balaji Ganeshan; Manuel Rodriquez; Francesco Fraioli; Simon Wan; Asim Afaq; Robert Shortman; Darren Walls; Luke Hoy; Raymond Endozo; Aman Bhargava; Matthew Hanson; Joseph Huang; Sherif Raouf; Daren Francis; Shahab Siddiqi; Tan Arulampalam; Bruce Sizer; Michael Machesney; Nicholas Reay-Jones; Sanjay Dindyal; Tony Ng; Ashley M Groves
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 9.236

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.