Literature DB >> 26204104

Shape effect in cellular uptake of PEGylated nanoparticles: comparison between sphere, rod, cube and disk.

Ying Li1, Martin Kröger, Wing Kam Liu.   

Abstract

The size, shape, surface property and material composition of polymer-coated nanoparticles (NPs) are four important parameters in designing efficient NP-based carriers for targeted drug delivery. However, due to the complex interplay between size, shape and surface property, most studies lead to ambiguous descriptions of the relevance of shape. To clarify its influence on the cellular uptake of PEGylated NPs, large scale molecular simulations have been performed to study differently shaped convex NPs, such as sphere, rod, cube and disk. Comparing systems with identical NP surface area, ligand-receptor interaction strength, and grafting density of the polyethylene glycol, we find that the spherical NPs exhibit the fastest internalization rate, followed by the cubic NPs, then rod- and disk-like NPs. The spherical NPs thus demonstrate the highest uptake among these differently shaped NPs. Based on a detailed free energy analysis, the NP shape effect is found to be mainly induced by the different membrane bending energies during endocytosis. The spherical NPs need to overcome a minimal membrane bending energy barrier, compared with the non-spherical counterparts, while the internalization of disk-like NPs involves a strong membrane deformation, responsible for a large free energy barrier. Besides, the free energy change per tethered chain is about a single kBT regardless of NP shape, as revealed by our self-consistent field theory calculations, where kB and T denote Boltzmann constant and temperature, respectively. Thus, the NP shape only plays the secondary role in the free energy change of grafted PEG polymers during internalization. We also find that star-shaped NPs can be quickly wrapped by the cell membrane, similar to their spherical counterparts, indicating star-shaped NPs can be used for drug delivery with high efficacy. Our findings seem to provide useful guidance in the molecular design of PEGylated NPs for controllable cellular uptake and help establish quantitatively rules in designing NP-based vectors for targeted drug delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26204104     DOI: 10.1039/c5nr02970h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale        ISSN: 2040-3364            Impact factor:   7.790


  43 in total

1.  Cell and nanoparticle transport in tumour microvasculature: the role of size, shape and surface functionality of nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ying Li; Yanping Lian; Lucy T Zhang; Saad M Aldousari; Hassan S Hedia; Saeed A Asiri; Wing Kam Liu
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Design of Nanoparticle-Based Carriers for Targeted Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Xiaojiao Yu; Ian Trase; Muqing Ren; Kayla Duval; Xing Guo; Zi Chen
Journal:  J Nanomater       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.986

3.  Entropic forces drive clustering and spatial localization of influenza A M2 during viral budding.

Authors:  Jesper J Madsen; John M A Grime; Jeremy S Rossman; Gregory A Voth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Enhancing Intracranial Delivery of Clinically Relevant Non-viral Gene Vectors.

Authors:  Sneha Berry; Panagiotis Mastorakos; Clark Zhang; Eric Song; Himat Patel; Jung Soo Suk; Justin Hanes
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 5.  Manipulating nanoparticle transport within blood flow through external forces: an exemplar of mechanics in nanomedicine.

Authors:  Huilin Ye; Zhiqiang Shen; Le Yu; Mei Wei; Ying Li
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.704

Review 6.  Nanoparticles in Daily Life: Applications, Toxicity and Regulations.

Authors:  Ritu Gupta; Huan Xie
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.567

Review 7.  Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutics for Brain Injury.

Authors:  Vimala N Bharadwaj; Duong T Nguyen; Vikram D Kodibagkar; Sarah E Stabenfeldt
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 8.  Fundamentals of siRNA and miRNA therapeutics and a review of targeted nanoparticle delivery systems in breast cancer.

Authors:  Tamkin Ahmadzada; Glen Reid; David R McKenzie
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2018-01-11

Review 9.  Nanoplatforms for Targeted Stimuli-Responsive Drug Delivery: A Review of Platform Materials and Stimuli-Responsive Release and Targeting Mechanisms.

Authors:  Yuzhe Sun; Edward Davis
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 10.  Targeted nanoparticles for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Bruno A Cisterna; Nazila Kamaly; Won Il Choi; Ali Tavakkoli; Omid C Farokhzad; Cristian Vilos
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 5.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.