Literature DB >> 26203588

Usability of clinical decision support system as a facilitator for learning the assistive technology adaptation process.

Alexandra Danial-Saad1,2, Tsvi Kuflik3, Patrice L Tamar Weiss1, Naomi Schreuer1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usability of Ontology Supported Computerized Assistive Technology Recommender (OSCAR), a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) for the assistive technology adaptation process, its impact on learning the matching process, and to determine the relationship between its usability and learnability. Two groups of expert and novice clinicians (total, n = 26) took part in this study. Each group filled out system usability scale (SUS) to evaluate OSCAR's usability. The novice group completed a learning questionnaire to assess OSCAR's effect on their ability to learn the matching process. Both groups rated OSCAR's usability as "very good", (M [SUS] = 80.7, SD = 11.6, median = 83.7) by the novices, and (M [SUS] = 81.2, SD = 6.8, median = 81.2) by the experts. The Mann-Whitney results indicated that no significant differences were found between the expert and novice groups in terms of OSCAR's usability. A significant positive correlation existed between the usability of OSCAR and the ability to learn the adaptation process (rs = 0.46, p = 0.04). Usability is an important factor in the acceptance of a system. The successful application of user-centered design principles during the development of OSCAR may serve as a case study that models the significant elements to be considered, theoretically and practically in developing other systems. Implications for Rehabilitation Creating a CDSS with a focus on its usability is an important factor for its acceptance by its users. Successful usability outcomes can impact the learning process of the subject matter in general, and the AT prescription process in particular. The successful application of User-Centered Design principles during the development of OSCAR may serve as a case study that models the significant elements to be considered, theoretically and practically. The study emphasizes the importance of close collaboration between the developers and the end users.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assistive technology; CDSS; learnability; people with disabilities; usability; user-centered design

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26203588     DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1070439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol        ISSN: 1748-3107


  3 in total

1.  i3b3: Infobuttons for i2b2 as a Mechanism for Investigating the Information Needs of Clinical Researchers.

Authors:  Timothy Kennell; Donald M Dempsey; James J Cimino
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

2.  Testing an individualized digital decision assist system for the diagnosis and management of mental and behavior disorders in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Carolyn E Clausen; Bennett L Leventhal; Øystein Nytrø; Roman Koposov; Odd Sverre Westbye; Thomas Brox Røst; Victoria Bakken; Kaban Koochakpour; Ketil Thorvik; Norbert Skokauskas
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  A roadmap for the development and evaluation of the eHealthResp online course.

Authors:  Marta Estrela; Tânia Magalhães Silva; Ana Margarida Pisco Almeida; Carlos Regueira; Maruxa Zapata-Cachafeiro; Adolfo Figueiras; Fátima Roque; Maria Teresa Herdeiro
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-03-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.