Literature DB >> 26203004

Adaptive genetic variation mediates bottom-up and top-down control in an aquatic ecosystem.

Seth M Rudman1, Mariano A Rodriguez-Cabal2, Adrian Stier3, Takuya Sato4, Julian Heavyside5, Rana W El-Sabaawi6, Gregory M Crutsinger5.   

Abstract

Research in eco-evolutionary dynamics and community genetics has demonstrated that variation within a species can have strong impacts on associated communities and ecosystem processes. Yet, these studies have centred around individual focal species and at single trophic levels, ignoring the role of phenotypic variation in multiple taxa within an ecosystem. Given the ubiquitous nature of local adaptation, and thus intraspecific variation, we sought to understand how combinations of intraspecific variation in multiple species within an ecosystem impacts its ecology. Using two species that co-occur and demonstrate adaptation to their natal environments, black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) and three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), we investigated the effects of intraspecific phenotypic variation on both top-down and bottom-up forces using a large-scale aquatic mesocosm experiment. Black cottonwood genotypes exhibit genetic variation in their productivity and consequently their leaf litter subsidies to the aquatic system, which mediates the strength of top-down effects from stickleback on prey abundances. Abundances of four common invertebrate prey species and available phosphorous, the most critically limiting nutrient in freshwater systems, are dictated by the interaction between genetic variation in cottonwood productivity and stickleback morphology. These interactive effects fit with ecological theory on the relationship between productivity and top-down control and are comparable in strength to the effects of predator addition. Our results illustrate that intraspecific variation, which can evolve rapidly, is an under-appreciated driver of community structure and ecosystem function, demonstrating that a multi-trophic perspective is essential to understanding the role of evolution in structuring ecological patterns.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gasterosteus aculeatus; Populus trichocarpa; community genetics; eco-evolutionary dynamics; local adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26203004      PMCID: PMC4528534          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  24 in total

1.  Predation, Body Size, and Composition of Plankton.

Authors:  J L Brooks; S I Dodson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-10-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs.

Authors:  Joe Hereford
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Evolutionary diversification in stickleback affects ecosystem functioning.

Authors:  Luke J Harmon; Blake Matthews; Simone Des Roches; Jonathan M Chase; Jonathan B Shurin; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Ecological consequences of genetic diversity.

Authors:  A Randall Hughes; Brian D Inouye; Marc T J Johnson; Nora Underwood; Mark Vellend
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 5.  Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Priyanga Amarasekare; Márcio S Araújo; Reinhard Bürger; Jonathan M Levine; Mark Novak; Volker H W Rudolf; Sebastian J Schreiber; Mark C Urban; David A Vasseur
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Consumer co-evolution as an important component of the eco-evolutionary feedback.

Authors:  Teppo Hiltunen; Lutz Becks
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Testing a 'genes-to-ecosystems' approach to understanding aquatic-terrestrial linkages.

Authors:  Gregory M Crutsinger; Seth M Rudman; Mariano A Rodriguez-Cabal; Athena D McKown; Takuya Sato; Andrew M MacDonald; Julian Heavyside; Armando Geraldes; Edmund M Hart; Carri J LeRoy; Rana W El-Sabaawi
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Local adaptation in Trinidadian guppies alters ecosystem processes.

Authors:  Ronald D Bassar; Michael C Marshall; Andrés López-Sepulcre; Eugenia Zandonà; Sonya K Auer; Joseph Travis; Catherine M Pringle; Alexander S Flecker; Steven A Thomas; Douglas F Fraser; David N Reznick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Geographical and environmental gradients shape phenotypic trait variation and genetic structure in Populus trichocarpa.

Authors:  Athena D McKown; Robert D Guy; Jaroslav Klápště; Armando Geraldes; Michael Friedmann; Quentin C B Cronk; Yousry A El-Kassaby; Shawn D Mansfield; Carl J Douglas
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Evolution mediates the effects of apex predation on aquatic food webs.

Authors:  Mark C Urban
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  7 in total

1.  Investment in boney defensive traits alters organismal stoichiometry and excretion in fish.

Authors:  Rana W El-Sabaawi; Misha L Warbanski; Seth M Rudman; Rachel Hovel; Blake Matthews
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Parallel changes in gut microbiome composition and function during colonization, local adaptation and ecological speciation.

Authors:  Diana J Rennison; Seth M Rudman; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Stoichiometric traits of stickleback: Effects of genetic background, rearing environment, and ontogeny.

Authors:  Miguel Costa Leal; Rebecca J Best; Dan Durston; Rana W El-Sabaawi; Blake Matthews
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Functional variation in a key defense gene structures herbivore communities and alters plant performance.

Authors:  Nora Adam; Mario Kallenbach; Stefan Meldau; Daniel Veit; Nicole M van Dam; Ian T Baldwin; Meredith C Schuman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Causes and consequences of intraspecific variation in animal responses to anthropogenic noise.

Authors:  Harry R Harding; Timothy A C Gordon; Emma Eastcott; Stephen D Simpson; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Species contributions to ecosystem process and function can be population dependent and modified by biotic and abiotic setting.

Authors:  Daniel Wohlgemuth; Martin Solan; Jasmin A Godbold
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  DNA metabarcoding reveals diverse diet of the three-spined stickleback in a coastal ecosystem.

Authors:  Eglė Jakubavičiūtė; Ulf Bergström; Johan S Eklöf; Quiterie Haenel; Sarah J Bourlat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.