Literature DB >> 26202518

Solid Phase Extraction as an Innovative Separation Method for Measuring Free and Entrapped Drug in Lipid Nanoparticles.

Alexis Guillot1,2,3, Anne-Claude Couffin4,5, Xavier Sejean4,5, Fabrice Navarro4,5, Markus Limberger6,7, Claus-Michael Lehr8,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Contrary to physical characterization techniques for nanopharmaceuticals (shape, size and zeta-potential), the techniques to quantify the free and the entrapped drug remain very few and difficult to transpose in routine analytical laboratories. The application of Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) technique was investigated to overcome this challenge.
METHODS: The separation of free and entrapped drug by SPE was quantitatively validated by High Performance Liquid Chromatography. The developed protocol was implemented to characterize cyclosporine A-loaded 120 nm-sized lipid nanoparticles (LNPs, Lipidot®) dispersed in aqueous buffer. The colloidal stability was assessed by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS).
RESULTS: Validation experiments demonstrated suitable linearity, repeatability, accuracy and specificity to quantify residual free, entrapped and total drug. For the investigated LNPs, the method revealed a very limited shelflife of the formulation when stored in an aqueous buffer at 5°C and even more at elevated temperature. Nevertheless, the DLS measurements confirmed the stability of nanoparticles during SPE in a suitable concentration range.
CONCLUSIONS: SPE, when successfully validated, represents a valuable tool for drug development and quality control purposes of lipid-based nanopharmaceuticals in an industrial environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cyclosporine; lipid nanoemulsion; nanoparticles; separation techniques; solid-phase extraction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26202518     DOI: 10.1007/s11095-015-1761-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  7 in total

1.  Common pitfalls in nanotechnology: lessons learned from NCI's Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory.

Authors:  Rachael M Crist; Jennifer Hall Grossman; Anil K Patri; Stephan T Stern; Marina A Dobrovolskaia; Pavan P Adiseshaiah; Jeffrey D Clogston; Scott E McNeil
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Determination of drug release kinetics from nanoparticles: overcoming pitfalls of the dynamic dialysis method.

Authors:  Sweta Modi; Bradley D Anderson
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  How to prepare and stabilize very small nanoemulsions.

Authors:  Thomas Delmas; Hélène Piraux; Anne-Claude Couffin; Isabelle Texier; Françoise Vinet; Philippe Poulin; Michael E Cates; Jérôme Bibette
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.882

4.  Rapid determination of the encapsulation efficiency of a liposome formulation using column-switching HPLC.

Authors:  Naozumi Ohnishi; Eiichi Yamamoto; Hiromasa Tomida; Kenji Hyodo; Hiroshi Ishihara; Hiroshi Kikuchi; Kohei Tahara; Hirofumi Takeuchi
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 5.  Cancer nanomedicines: so many papers and so few drugs!

Authors:  Vincent J Venditto; Francis C Szoka
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 15.470

6.  Determination of free and liposome-associated daunorubicin and daunorubicinol in plasma by capillary electrophoresis.

Authors:  Nina Griese; Gottfried Blaschke; Joachim Boos; Georg Hempel
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2002-12-06       Impact factor: 4.759

7.  Drug release from nanomedicines: Selection of appropriate encapsulation and release methodology.

Authors:  Stephanie J Wallace; Jian Li; Roger L Nation; Ben J Boyd
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 4.617

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.