Literature DB >> 26202486

Estimating the tendency of motor unit recruitment during steady-hold and rapid contractions using surface EMG and Turns-amplitude analysis.

Li-Ling Pan1, Chung-Huang Yu1, Mei-Wun Tsai1, Shun-Hwa Wei1, Li-Wei Chou2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in the interference pattern in surface electromyography (EMG), and its relationship with the tendency of motor unit (MU) recruitment during steady-hold and rapid muscle contractions.
METHODS: Fifteen healthy adults (eight females and seven males, 22.6 ± 1.5 years old) performed steady-hold and rapid isometric contractions of the bicep brachii, adductor pollicis, and tibialis anterior muscles at various force levels. Surface EMG recordings were analyzed using Turns-Amplitude Analysis (TAA).
RESULTS: During steady-hold contractions, the number of turns per second (T/s) increased exponentially with force during submaximal contractions, and plateaued after force levels of 66, 70 and 57 % MVC for the tibialis anterior, bicep brachii and adductor pollicis muscles, respectively. These force levels were proximate to the maximal recruitment threshold (MaxRT) reported previously. The slopes of the T/s-force relationships before the MaxRT were significantly greater than the slopes after the MaxRT for all three muscles tested. During rapid contraction, the slopes of the T/s-force relationships were significantly lower than the slopes of the steady-hold contraction at 20-40 % MVC in all three muscles, and for 40-60 % MVC in TA muscles.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that the changes in the number of turns in surface EMG with respect to muscle force can be used to estimate the force levels at which the majority of the MUs to be recruited, and completion of MU recruitment was observed at lower force levels during rapid muscle contraction.

Keywords:  Maximal recruitment threshold; Motor unit; Rapid contraction; Steady-hold; Surface electromyography; Turns-Amplitude Analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26202486     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-015-3223-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  33 in total

Review 1.  The utility of interference pattern analysis.

Authors:  A Fuglsang-Frederiksen
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CELL SIZE IN SPINAL MOTONEURONS.

Authors:  E HENNEMAN; G SOMJEN; D O CARPENTER
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Common drive of motor units in regulation of muscle force.

Authors:  C J De Luca; Z Erim
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Neuromuscular drive and force production are not altered during bilateral contractions.

Authors:  J M Jakobi; E Cafarelli
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1998-01

5.  Diagnostic yield of the analysis of the pattern of electrical activity of muscle and of individual motor unit potentials in neurogenic involvement.

Authors:  A Fuglsang-Frederiksen; U Scheel; F Buchthal
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Membrane-potential trajectories underlying motoneuron rhythmic firing at high rates.

Authors:  P C Schwindt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Human motor unit recordings: origins and insight into the integrated motor system.

Authors:  Jacques Duchateau; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Ballistic contractions in man: characteristic recruitment pattern of single motor units of the tibialis anterior muscle.

Authors:  J E Desmedt; E Godaux
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Behaviour of human motor units in different muscles during linearly varying contractions.

Authors:  C J De Luca; R S LeFever; M P McCue; A P Xenakis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans.

Authors:  M Van Cutsem; J Duchateau; K Hainaut
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.