Literature DB >> 26202035

Value of the APASL severity score in patients with acute variceal bleeding: a single center experience.

Go Heun Kim1, Jeong Han Kim2, Yong Jin Kim1, Soon Young Ko1, Won Hyeok Choe1, So Young Kwon1, Chang Hong Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute variceal bleeding is a severe complication in patients with cirrhosis. The Asian Pacific Association for Study of the Liver (APASL) severity score was proposed in 2011. This score is used for evaluating the severity of acute variceal bleeding. However, as this score is largely based on expert opinion, it requires validation. AIM: To determine the value of the APASL severity score.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients treated for acute variceal bleeding at Konkuk University Hospital from 2006 to 2011. The APASL severity score, Child-Pugh score, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score were calculated, and predictive values for treatment failure, rebleeding, and in-hospital mortality were compared by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC).
RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were enrolled, and all patients were treated by endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and terlipressin combination therapy. Most patients were male (n = 123, 90.4 %), and the most common etiology was alcohol (n = 91, 66.9 %). Thirteen treatment failures, eight rebleedings, and seven in-hospital mortalities occurred. The AUROCs of the APASL severity score, Child-Pugh score, and MELD score were 0.760, 0.681, and 0.607 for treatment failure; 0.660, 0.714, and 0.677 for rebleeding; and 0.872, 0.847, and 0.735 for in-hospital mortality. A significant difference was only observed between the APASL severity score and MELD score for treatment failure (p = 0.0259).
CONCLUSION: APASL severity score was a useful method for predicting treatment failure. However, the predictive value for rebleeding and in-hospital mortality were not satisfactory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In-hospital mortality; Rebleeding; Treatment failure; Variceal bleeding

Year:  2013        PMID: 26202035     DOI: 10.1007/s12072-013-9466-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatol Int        ISSN: 1936-0533            Impact factor:   6.047


  27 in total

1.  Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Arun J Sanyal; Norman D Grace; William Carey
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Early use of TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding.

Authors:  Juan Carlos García-Pagán; Karel Caca; Christophe Bureau; Wim Laleman; Beate Appenrodt; Angelo Luca; Juan G Abraldes; Frederik Nevens; Jean Pierre Vinel; Joachim Mössner; Jaime Bosch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Endoscopic ligation compared with sclerotherapy for treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Laine; D Cook
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Prognostic value of early measurements of portal pressure in acute variceal bleeding.

Authors:  E Moitinho; A Escorsell; J C Bandi; J M Salmerón; J C García-Pagán; J Rodés; J Bosch
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Influence of portal hypertension and its early decompression by TIPS placement on the outcome of variceal bleeding.

Authors:  Alberto Monescillo; Francisco Martínez-Lagares; Luis Ruiz-del-Arbol; Angel Sierra; Clemencia Guevara; Elena Jiménez; José Miguel Marrero; Enrique Buceta; Juan Sánchez; Ana Castellot; Mónica Peñate; Ana Cruz; Elena Peña
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Predicting early mortality after acute variceal hemorrhage based on classification and regression tree analysis.

Authors:  Salvador Augustin; Laura Muntaner; José T Altamirano; Antonio González; Esteban Saperas; Joan Dot; Monder Abu-Suboh; Josep R Armengol; Joan R Malagelada; Rafael Esteban; Jaime Guardia; Joan Genescà
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Upper digestive bleeding in cirrhosis. Post-therapeutic outcome and prognostic indicators.

Authors:  Gennaro D'Amico; Roberto De Franchis
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  Improved survival after variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis over the past two decades.

Authors:  Nicolas Carbonell; Arnaud Pauwels; Lawrence Serfaty; Olivier Fourdan; Victor George Lévy; Raoul Poupon
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Prognostic significance of bacterial infection in bleeding cirrhotic patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  B Bernard; J F Cadranel; D Valla; S Escolano; V Jarlier; P Opolon
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with esophageal varices. What is the most common source?

Authors:  F M Sutton
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prognostic value of risk scoring systems for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.

Authors:  Xin-Xing Tantai; Na Liu; Long-Bao Yang; Zhong-Cao Wei; Cai-Lan Xiao; Ya-Hua Song; Jin-Hai Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.