Akihiro Ohira1, Katsunori Hara1, Gauti Jóhannesson2, Masaki Tanito1, Gudrún Marta Ásgrímsdóttir3, Sigrún H Lund4, Thorsteinn Loftsson5, Einar Stefánsson6. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan. 2. Department of Clinical Science, Ophthalmology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 3. Oculis ehf., Reykjavik, Iceland. 4. Centre of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. 5. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. 6. Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, National University Hospital, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare in a randomized, controlled trial topical 1.5% dexamethasone γ-cyclodextrin nanoparticle eye drops (DexNP) with posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in diabetic macular oedema (DME). METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 22 eyes of 22 consecutive patients with DME were randomized to (i) topical treatment with DexNP ×3/day (4 weeks), ×2/day (4 weeks) and ×1/day (4 weeks) or (ii) one posterior subtenon injection of 20 mg triamcinolone acetonide. Study visits were at baseline and 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks. RESULTS: The logMAR (Snellen) visual acuity (mean ± SD) improved significantly with DexNP from 0.41 ± 0.3 (Snellen 0.39) to 0.32 ± 0.25 (0.48) and 0.30 ± 0.26 (0.50) at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. One-third of the DexNP group improved more than 0.3 logMAR units. For triamcinolone, logMAR changed significantly from 0.42 ± 0.28 (0.38) at baseline to 0.32 ± 0.29 (0.48) at 4w and 0.33 ± 0.37 (0.47) at 12w. The central macular thickness (CMT) decreased significantly with DexNP from 483 ± 141 μm to 384 ±142 μm at 4w and 342 ± 114 μm at 8w. For triamcinolone, CMT decreased significantly at all time-points: 494 ± 94 μm, 388 ± 120, 388 ± 145, 390 ± 136 and 411 ± 104 μm at 0, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks, respectively. There was a modest increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) at all time-points with DexNP while no increase was seen with triamcinolone. Serum cortisol was affected by both treatments. CONCLUSION:Topical DexNP significantly improve visual acuity and decrease macular thickness in patients with DME. The effect is similar to that from subtenon triamcinolone. A modest increase in IOP was seen with the nanoparticle eye drops, but IOP normalized after the discontinuation of treatment.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To compare in a randomized, controlled trial topical 1.5% dexamethasone γ-cyclodextrin nanoparticle eye drops (DexNP) with posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in diabetic macular oedema (DME). METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 22 eyes of 22 consecutive patients with DME were randomized to (i) topical treatment with DexNP ×3/day (4 weeks), ×2/day (4 weeks) and ×1/day (4 weeks) or (ii) one posterior subtenon injection of 20 mg triamcinolone acetonide. Study visits were at baseline and 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks. RESULTS: The logMAR (Snellen) visual acuity (mean ± SD) improved significantly with DexNP from 0.41 ± 0.3 (Snellen 0.39) to 0.32 ± 0.25 (0.48) and 0.30 ± 0.26 (0.50) at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. One-third of the DexNP group improved more than 0.3 logMAR units. For triamcinolone, logMAR changed significantly from 0.42 ± 0.28 (0.38) at baseline to 0.32 ± 0.29 (0.48) at 4w and 0.33 ± 0.37 (0.47) at 12w. The central macular thickness (CMT) decreased significantly with DexNP from 483 ± 141 μm to 384 ± 142 μm at 4w and 342 ± 114 μm at 8w. For triamcinolone, CMT decreased significantly at all time-points: 494 ± 94 μm, 388 ± 120, 388 ± 145, 390 ± 136 and 411 ± 104 μm at 0, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks, respectively. There was a modest increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) at all time-points with DexNP while no increase was seen with triamcinolone. Serum cortisol was affected by both treatments. CONCLUSION: Topical DexNP significantly improve visual acuity and decrease macular thickness in patients with DME. The effect is similar to that from subtenon triamcinolone. A modest increase in IOP was seen with the nanoparticle eye drops, but IOP normalized after the discontinuation of treatment.
Authors: I Bravo-Osuna; V Andrés-Guerrero; P Pastoriza Abal; I T Molina-Martínez; R Herrero-Vanrell Journal: Drug Deliv Transl Res Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.617
Authors: Kongnara Papangkorn; Eri Prendergast; John W Higuchi; Balbir Brar; William I Higuchi Journal: J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 2.671