Literature DB >> 26201952

Estimating the magnitude of near-membrane PDE4 activity in living cells.

Wenkuan Xin1, Wei P Feinstein2, Andrea L Britain3, Cristhiaan D Ochoa4, Bing Zhu5, Wito Richter6, Silas J Leavesley7, Thomas C Rich8.   

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that functionally discrete pools of phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity regulate distinct cellular functions. While the importance of localized pools of enzyme activity has become apparent, few studies have estimated enzyme activity within discrete subcellular compartments. Here we present an approach to estimate near-membrane PDE activity. First, total PDE activity is measured using traditional PDE activity assays. Second, known cAMP concentrations are dialyzed into single cells and the spatial spread of cAMP is monitored using cyclic nucleotide-gated channels. Third, mathematical models are used to estimate the spatial distribution of PDE activity within cells. Using this three-tiered approach, we observed two pharmacologically distinct pools of PDE activity, a rolipram-sensitive pool and an 8-methoxymethyl IBMX (8MM-IBMX)-sensitive pool. We observed that the rolipram-sensitive PDE (PDE4) was primarily responsible for cAMP hydrolysis near the plasma membrane. Finally, we observed that PDE4 was capable of blunting cAMP levels near the plasma membrane even when 100 μM cAMP were introduced into the cell via a patch pipette. Two compartment models predict that PDE activity near the plasma membrane, near cyclic nucleotide-gated channels, was significantly lower than total cellular PDE activity and that a slow spatial spread of cAMP allowed PDE activity to effectively hydrolyze near-membrane cAMP. These results imply that cAMP levels near the plasma membrane are distinct from those in other subcellular compartments; PDE activity is not uniform within cells; and localized pools of AC and PDE activities are responsible for controlling cAMP levels within distinct subcellular compartments.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CNG channel; G protein-coupled receptor; cAMP compartmentalization; phosphodiesterase; protein kinase A

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26201952      PMCID: PMC4572370          DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00090.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6143            Impact factor:   4.249


  49 in total

1.  A specific pattern of phosphodiesterases controls the cAMP signals generated by different Gs-coupled receptors in adult rat ventricular myocytes.

Authors:  Francesca Rochais; Aniella Abi-Gerges; Kathleen Horner; Florence Lefebvre; Dermot M F Cooper; Marco Conti; Rodolphe Fischmeister; Grégoire Vandecasteele
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 2.  Photoreceptor membrane proteins, phototransduction, and retinal degenerative diseases. The Friedenwald Lecture.

Authors:  R S Molday
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Inactivation of multidrug resistance proteins disrupts both cellular extrusion and intracellular degradation of cAMP.

Authors:  Moses Xie; Thomas C Rich; Colleen Scheitrum; Marco Conti; Wito Richter
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  Cyclic AMP diffusion coefficient in frog olfactory cilia.

Authors:  C Chen; T Nakamura; Y Koutalos
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Compartmentation of cAMP signaling in cardiac myocytes: a computational study.

Authors:  Radu V Iancu; Stephen W Jones; Robert D Harvey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Isolation and characterization of cDNAs corresponding to two human calcium, calmodulin-regulated, 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases.

Authors:  K Loughney; T J Martins; E A Harris; K Sadhu; J B Hicks; W K Sonnenburg; J A Beavo; K Ferguson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-01-12       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  AKAP79 selectively enhances protein kinase C regulation of GluR1 at a Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II/protein kinase C site.

Authors:  Steven J Tavalin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  PDE4D and PDE4B function in distinct subcellular compartments in mouse embryonic fibroblasts.

Authors:  Brigitte E Blackman; Kathleen Horner; Julia Heidmann; Dan Wang; Wito Richter; Thomas C Rich; Marco Conti
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Fourth-generation epac-based FRET sensors for cAMP feature exceptional brightness, photostability and dynamic range: characterization of dedicated sensors for FLIM, for ratiometry and with high affinity.

Authors:  Jeffrey Klarenbeek; Joachim Goedhart; Aernoud van Batenburg; Daniella Groenewald; Kees Jalink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  cAMP signaling microdomains and their observation by optical methods.

Authors:  Davide Calebiro; Isabella Maiellaro
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.505

View more
  8 in total

1.  5D imaging approaches reveal the formation of distinct intracellular cAMP spatial gradients.

Authors:  Thomas C Rich; Naga Annamdevula; Kenny Trinh; Andrea L Britain; Samuel A Mayes; John R Griswold; Joshua Deal; Chase Hoffman; Savannah West; Silas J Leavesley
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-02-17

2.  Compartmentalized cAMP responses to prostaglandin EP2 receptor activation in human airway smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  Shailesh R Agarwal; Kathryn Miyashiro; Htun Latt; Rennolds S Ostrom; Robert D Harvey
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Spectral imaging of FRET-based sensors reveals sustained cAMP gradients in three spatial dimensions.

Authors:  Naga S Annamdevula; Rachel Sweat; John R Griswold; Kenny Trinh; Chase Hoffman; Savannah West; Joshua Deal; Andrea L Britain; Kees Jalink; Thomas C Rich; Silas J Leavesley
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  Computational investigation of the dynamic control of cAMP signaling by PDE4 isoform types.

Authors:  Dean Paes; Sammy Hermans; Daniel van den Hove; Tim Vanmierlo; Jos Prickaerts; Aurélie Carlier
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 3.699

5.  Three dimensional measurement of cAMP gradients using hyperspectral confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Thomas C Rich; Naga Annamdevula; Andrea L Britain; Samuel Mayes; Peter F Favreau; Silas J Leavelsey
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-03-09

6.  Optical Mapping of cAMP Signaling at the Nanometer Scale.

Authors:  Andreas Bock; Paolo Annibale; Charlotte Konrad; Annette Hannawacker; Selma E Anton; Isabella Maiellaro; Ulrike Zabel; Sivaraj Sivaramakrishnan; Martin Falcke; Martin J Lohse
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Hyperspectral imaging microscopy for measurement of localized second messenger signals in single cells.

Authors:  Thomas C Rich; J R Griswold; Joshua Deal; Naga Annamdevula; Kathleen McAlister; Samuel Mayes; Craig Browning; Marina Parker; Silas J Leavelsey
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-03-04

8.  Mechanisms Restricting Diffusion of Intracellular cAMP.

Authors:  Shailesh R Agarwal; Colleen E Clancy; Robert D Harvey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.