Literature DB >> 26201598

Statistical analysis of iron geochemical data suggests limited late Proterozoic oxygenation.

Erik A Sperling1, Charles J Wolock2, Alex S Morgan3, Benjamin C Gill4, Marcus Kunzmann5, Galen P Halverson5, Francis A Macdonald3, Andrew H Knoll6, David T Johnston3.   

Abstract

Sedimentary rocks deposited across the Proterozoic-Phanerozoic transition record extreme climate fluctuations, a potential rise in atmospheric oxygen or re-organization of the seafloor redox landscape, and the initial diversification of animals. It is widely assumed that the inferred redox change facilitated the observed trends in biodiversity. Establishing this palaeoenvironmental context, however, requires that changes in marine redox structure be tracked by means of geochemical proxies and translated into estimates of atmospheric oxygen. Iron-based proxies are among the most effective tools for tracking the redox chemistry of ancient oceans. These proxies are inherently local, but have global implications when analysed collectively and statistically. Here we analyse about 4,700 iron-speciation measurements from shales 2,300 to 360 million years old. Our statistical analyses suggest that subsurface water masses in mid-Proterozoic oceans were predominantly anoxic and ferruginous (depleted in dissolved oxygen and iron-bearing), but with a tendency towards euxinia (sulfide-bearing) that is not observed in the Neoproterozoic era. Analyses further indicate that early animals did not experience appreciable benthic sulfide stress. Finally, unlike proxies based on redox-sensitive trace-metal abundances, iron geochemical data do not show a statistically significant change in oxygen content through the Ediacaran and Cambrian periods, sharply constraining the magnitude of the end-Proterozoic oxygen increase. Indeed, this re-analysis of trace-metal data is consistent with oxygenation continuing well into the Palaeozoic era. Therefore, if changing redox conditions facilitated animal diversification, it did so through a limited rise in oxygen past critical functional and ecological thresholds, as is seen in modern oxygen minimum zone benthic animal communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26201598     DOI: 10.1038/nature14589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  18 in total

Review 1.  Early cell evolution, eukaryotes, anoxia, sulfide, oxygen, fungi first (?), and a tree of genomes revisited.

Authors:  William Martin; Carmen Rotte; Meike Hoffmeister; Ursula Theissen; Gabriel Gelius-Dietrich; Simone Ahr; Katrin Henze
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2003 Apr-May       Impact factor: 3.885

2.  The Cambrian conundrum: early divergence and later ecological success in the early history of animals.

Authors:  Douglas H Erwin; Marc Laflamme; Sarah M Tweedt; Erik A Sperling; Davide Pisani; Kevin J Peterson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Devonian rise in atmospheric oxygen correlated to the radiations of terrestrial plants and large predatory fish.

Authors:  Tais W Dahl; Emma U Hammarlund; Ariel D Anbar; David P G Bond; Benjamin C Gill; Gwyneth W Gordon; Andrew H Knoll; Arne T Nielsen; Niels H Schovsbo; Donald E Canfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Phanerozoic trends in the global diversity of marine invertebrates.

Authors:  John Alroy; Martin Aberhan; David J Bottjer; Michael Foote; Franz T Fürsich; Peter J Harries; Austin J W Hendy; Steven M Holland; Linda C Ivany; Wolfgang Kiessling; Matthew A Kosnik; Charles R Marshall; Alistair J McGowan; Arnold I Miller; Thomas D Olszewski; Mark E Patzkowsky; Shanan E Peters; Loïc Villier; Peter J Wagner; Nicole Bonuso; Philip S Borkow; Benjamin Brenneis; Matthew E Clapham; Leigh M Fall; Chad A Ferguson; Victoria L Hanson; Andrew Z Krug; Karen M Layou; Erin H Leckey; Sabine Nürnberg; Catherine M Powers; Jocelyn A Sessa; Carl Simpson; Adam Tomasovych; Christy C Visaggi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Widespread iron-rich conditions in the mid-Proterozoic ocean.

Authors:  Noah J Planavsky; Peter McGoldrick; Clinton T Scott; Chao Li; Christopher T Reinhard; Amy E Kelly; Xuelei Chu; Andrey Bekker; Gordon D Love; Timothy W Lyons
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Proterozoic ocean redox and biogeochemical stasis.

Authors:  Christopher T Reinhard; Noah J Planavsky; Leslie J Robbins; Camille A Partin; Benjamin C Gill; Stefan V Lalonde; Andrey Bekker; Kurt O Konhauser; Timothy W Lyons
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Oxygen requirements of the earliest animals.

Authors:  Daniel B Mills; Lewis M Ward; Carriayne Jones; Brittany Sweeten; Michael Forth; Alexander H Treusch; Donald E Canfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Oxygen, ecology, and the Cambrian radiation of animals.

Authors:  Erik A Sperling; Christina A Frieder; Akkur V Raman; Peter R Girguis; Lisa A Levin; Andrew H Knoll
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Ferruginous conditions dominated later neoproterozoic deep-water chemistry.

Authors:  Donald E Canfield; Simon W Poulton; Andrew H Knoll; Guy M Narbonne; Gerry Ross; Tatiana Goldberg; Harald Strauss
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Limits for combustion in low O2 redefine paleoatmospheric predictions for the Mesozoic.

Authors:  C M Belcher; J C McElwain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  61 in total

1.  Biotic replacement and mass extinction of the Ediacara biota.

Authors:  Simon A F Darroch; Erik A Sperling; Thomas H Boag; Rachel A Racicot; Sara J Mason; Alex S Morgan; Sarah Tweedt; Paul Myrow; David T Johnston; Douglas H Erwin; Marc Laflamme
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  What sparked the Cambrian explosion?

Authors:  Douglas Fox
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Oxygen, temperature and the deep-marine stenothermal cradle of Ediacaran evolution.

Authors:  Thomas H Boag; Richard G Stockey; Leanne E Elder; Pincelli M Hull; Erik A Sperling
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Oxygenated Mesoproterozoic lake revealed through magnetic mineralogy.

Authors:  Sarah P Slotznick; Nicholas L Swanson-Hysell; Erik A Sperling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Neoproterozoic to early Phanerozoic rise in island arc redox state due to deep ocean oxygenation and increased marine sulfate levels.

Authors:  Daniel A Stolper; Claire E Bucholz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Reconciling proxy records and models of Earth's oxygenation during the Neoproterozoic and Palaeozoic.

Authors:  Rosalie Tostevin; Benjamin J W Mills
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 7.  Insights into eukaryogenesis from the fossil record.

Authors:  Susannah M Porter
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 8.  The rise and early evolution of animals: where do we stand from a trace-fossil perspective?

Authors:  M Gabriela Mángano; Luis A Buatois
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 9.  The evolution of complex life and the stabilization of the Earth system.

Authors:  Jonathan L Payne; Aviv Bachan; Noel A Heim; Pincelli M Hull; Matthew L Knope
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.906

10.  Earliest land plants created modern levels of atmospheric oxygen.

Authors:  Timothy M Lenton; Tais W Dahl; Stuart J Daines; Benjamin J W Mills; Kazumi Ozaki; Matthew R Saltzman; Philipp Porada
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.