| Literature DB >> 26201075 |
Patricia Puerta1, Mary E Hunsicker2, Antoni Quetglas1, Diego Álvarez-Berastegui3, Antonio Esteban4, María González5, Manuel Hidalgo1.
Abstract
Populations of the same species can experience different responses to the environment throughout their distributional range as a result of spatial and temporal heterogeneity in habitat conditions. This highlights the importance of understanding the processes governing species distribution at local scales. However, research on species distribution often averages environmental covariates across large geographic areas, missing variability in population-environment interactions within geographically distinct regions. We used spatially explicit models to identify interactions between species and environmental, including chlorophyll a (Chla) and sea surface temperature (SST), and trophic (prey density) conditions, along with processes governing the distribution of two cephalopods with contrasting life-histories (octopus and squid) across the western Mediterranean Sea. This approach is relevant for cephalopods, since their population dynamics are especially sensitive to variations in habitat conditions and rarely stable in abundance and location. The regional distributions of the two cephalopod species matched two different trophic pathways present in the western Mediterranean Sea, associated with the Gulf of Lion upwelling and the Ebro river discharges respectively. The effects of the studied environmental and trophic conditions were spatially variant in both species, with usually stronger effects along their distributional boundaries. We identify areas where prey availability limited the abundance of cephalopod populations as well as contrasting effects of temperature in the warmest regions. Despite distributional patterns matching productive areas, a general negative effect of Chla on cephalopod densities suggests that competition pressure is common in the study area. Additionally, results highlight the importance of trophic interactions, beyond other common environmental factors, in shaping the distribution of cephalopod populations. Our study presents a valuable approach for understanding the spatially variant ecology of cephalopod populations, which is important for fisheries and ecosystem management.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26201075 PMCID: PMC4511516 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133439
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Study area and sampling sites.
Map of the western Mediterranean Sea showing 200 to 1000 m isobaths and selected stations sampled for at least 5 out of the 12 years in the MEDITS surveys. Main surface circulation patterns are described by arrows: Northern Current (NC), Balearic Current (BC), Atlantic jet (AJ) and Alboran gyres (AG).
Fig 2Overall predicted distributions (2001–2012) of environmental and trophic covariates.
A) log transformed density of benthic crustaceans (preys of octopus), B) log transformed density of meso-pelagic fish (preys of squid), C) Chlorophyll a concentration (Chla), and D) sea surface temperature (SST) estimated from variable coefficient Generalized Additive Models.
Model selection for the stages (sub-models) of Delta Generalized Additive Models in octopus (Eledone cirrhosa) and squid (Illex coindetii).
Comparisons of full Delta-GAM and variable-coefficient, vc, Delta-GAM (formulations were simplified). Base term includes C = a + s 1(ϕ,λ) + s 2(depth); where C is either the probability of cephalopods occurrence (stage 1, presence-absence sub-model) or an estimate of natural logarithm of density when the cephalopods are present (stage 2, density sub-model); a is the year (y) -specific intercept, latitude ϕ, longitude λ and depth. Other parameters included as smoothing functions (s ) in the models are prey, as the natural logarithm of prey densities, day of the year, DOY, monthly average chlorophyll a concentration, Chla and sea surface temperature, SST. For each model and stage AIC: Akaike Information Criterion, AIC: increment of AIC: ΔAIC, gCV: genuine Cross Validation and dev. exp: percentage of deviance explained by the model are given. Best models obtained for each formulation and stages are in bold.
| Species | DeltaGAM | Stage | Model terms | AIC | ΔAIC | gCV | Dev.exp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| full | 1 | Base + s3(DOY) + s6(SST) | 1595.27 | 0 | 0.16 | 37.1 |
| full | 1 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| full | 1 | Base + s6(SST) | 1595.88 | 0.61 | 0.16 | 37 | |
| full | 2 | Base + s4(prey) + s5(Chla) + s6(SST) | 2486.96 | 0 | 0.81 | 32.2 | |
| full | 2 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| full | 2 | Base + s3(DOY) + s4(prey) + s5(Chla) + s6(SST) | 2488.89 | 1.93 | 0.81 | 32.2 | |
| vc | 1 | Base + s3(DOY) + s4(ϕ, λ)·prey + s5(ϕ, λ)·Chla | 1590.46 | 0 | 0.16 | 37.5 | |
| vc | 1 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| vc | 1 | Base + s3(DOY) + s4(ϕ, λ)·prey | 1591.81 | 1.35 | 0.16 | 37.2 | |
| vc | 2 | Base + s3(DOY) + s4(ϕ, λ)·prey + s5(ϕ, λ)·Chla + s6(ϕ, λ)·SST | 2482.53 | 0 | 0.82 | 32.8 | |
| vc | 2 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| vc | 2 | Base + s3(DOY) + s4(ϕ, λ)·prey + s5(ϕ, λ)·Chla | 2486.53 | 4 | 0.82 | 32.3 | |
|
| full | 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| full | 1 | Base + s3(DOY) + s4(prey) + s5(Chla) + s6(SST) | 1757.02 | 0.53 | 0.18 | 31.3 | |
| full | 1 | Base + s3(DOY) + s6(SST) | 1758.85 | 2.35 | 0.18 | 31 | |
| full | 2 | Base + s3(DOY) + s4(prey) + s5(Chla) + s6(SST) | 2774.77 | 0 | 1.4 | 38.5 | |
| full | 2 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| full | 2 | Base + s3(DOY) + s4(prey) + s5(Chla) | 2778.64 | 3.87 | 1.4 | 37.8 | |
| vc | 1 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| vc | 1 | Base + s3(DOY) + s4(ϕ, λ)·prey + s6(ϕ, λ)·SST | 1723.52 | 2.55 | 0.17 | 32.7 | |
| vc | 1 | Base + s4(ϕ, λ)·prey + s5(ϕ, λ)·Chla | 1730.69 | 9.72 | 0.18 | 32.3 | |
| vc | 2 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| vc | 2 | Base + s3(DOY) + s4(ϕ, λ)·prey + s5(ϕ, λ)·Chla | 2713.26 | 1.01 | 1.32 | 42.6 | |
| vc | 2 | Base + s3(DOY) + s4(ϕ, λ)·prey + s5(ϕ, λ)·Chla + s6(ϕ, λ)·SST | 2713.96 | 1.71 | 1.32 | 43 |
Fig 3Overall predicted distributions of octopus (Eledone cirrhosa) and squid (Illex coindetii) estimated from variable coefficient Delta Generalized Additive Models.
A) Spatial distribution of log transformed densities. B) Partial effects of depth on the vertical distribution of cephalopod densities. Shaded areas indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Fig 4Spatially explicit effects of environmental and trophic covariates on the density of octopus (Eledone cirrhosa) and squid (Illex coindetii).
Effects of A) prey densities, B) chlorophyll a concentration (Chla) and C) sea surface temperature (SST) estimated from variable coefficient Generalized Additive Models using only positive data. Red and blue bubbles represent respectively negative and positive effect of each covariate on log-transformed cephalopod densities. Only effects (regression slopes) significantly different from zero are showed, based on the estimates of the 95% confidence interval. Overall predicted densities (log transformed) of each species are shown underlayed, with the highest densities indicated by dark grey cells.