INTRODUCTION: American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL) can be caused by Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis complex. The evolution of ATL initially results in lesions and can develop into disseminated or diffuse forms. The genetic diversity of L. (V.) braziliensis in some endemic areas of Brazil has been poorly studied, such as in the state of São Paulo. This study analyzed the genetic diversity of L. (V.) braziliensis isolates collected from patients and dogs with LTA from the state of São Paulo. METHODS: Leishmaniasis diagnosis was determined by PCR. The 132 biopsies were collected in different regions of Sao Paulo State, Brazil (36 municipalities). The genetic characterization of L. (V.) braziliensis isolates was tested by RFLP-PCR using DNA extracted from biopsies. The primer set amplified a specific region of Leishmania internal transcribed spacers of the ribosomal DNA locus. RESULTS: Of the 132 samples, 52 (40%) were completely genotyped by RFLP-PCR (44 from human patients and eight from dogs). The results showed nine distinct patterns. The majority of the genotyped samples were from Sorocaba (30), and the others were distributed among 14 other municipalities. The first pattern was more frequent (29 samples), followed by pattern 2 (nine samples) and pattern 3 (three samples). Patterns 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9 were composed of two samples each and pattern 5 of one sample. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that polymorphic strains of L. (V.) braziliensis circulate in the state of São Paulo. These data agree with studies from other regions of Brazil, showing great variability among the natural populations of endemic foci.
INTRODUCTION: American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL) can be caused by Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis complex. The evolution of ATL initially results in lesions and can develop into disseminated or diffuse forms. The genetic diversity of L. (V.) braziliensis in some endemic areas of Brazil has been poorly studied, such as in the state of São Paulo. This study analyzed the genetic diversity of L. (V.) braziliensis isolates collected from patients and dogs with LTA from the state of São Paulo. METHODS:Leishmaniasis diagnosis was determined by PCR. The 132 biopsies were collected in different regions of Sao Paulo State, Brazil (36 municipalities). The genetic characterization of L. (V.) braziliensis isolates was tested by RFLP-PCR using DNA extracted from biopsies. The primer set amplified a specific region of Leishmania internal transcribed spacers of the ribosomal DNA locus. RESULTS: Of the 132 samples, 52 (40%) were completely genotyped by RFLP-PCR (44 from humanpatients and eight from dogs). The results showed nine distinct patterns. The majority of the genotyped samples were from Sorocaba (30), and the others were distributed among 14 other municipalities. The first pattern was more frequent (29 samples), followed by pattern 2 (nine samples) and pattern 3 (three samples). Patterns 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9 were composed of two samples each and pattern 5 of one sample. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that polymorphic strains of L. (V.) braziliensis circulate in the state of São Paulo. These data agree with studies from other regions of Brazil, showing great variability among the natural populations of endemic foci.
The Leishmania genus causes leishmaniasis, which constitutes a variety
of chronic diseases. There is a wide spectrum of clinical forms, including those
affecting the skin, mucosa, or internal organs16
,
18.The subgenera LeishmaniaViannia is the causative agent of new-world
cutaneous leishmaniasis, comprising the species L. (V.) braziliensis,L. (V.)
panamensis and L. (V.) guyanesis, among others18
,
26. Infections by these species cause three
clinical types of American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL): localized cutaneous,
mucosal, and disseminated leishmaniasis. Cutaneous lesions are restricted to the entry
site of the parasites, whereas the mucosal strain is defined by its spreading to the
mucosal surfaces of the upper digestive and airway tracts. Disseminated leishmaniasis is
characterized by large-scale spreading to distant cutaneous sites2
,
14
,
15
,
24.Despite the fact that cutaneous leishmaniasis is caused by at least seven different
Leishmania species in Brazil, the vast majority of cases are caused
by the L. (V.)
braziliensissub-genera, which can be transmitted by different
phlebotomine sandfly vectors via animal reservoirs across a wide geographic
distribution1
,
7
,
16
,
18
,
28.ATL is widely distributed across the Americas. Between 2001 and 2011, around 270,500
cases were reported, with an average of 27,500 new cases/year. Around 3 - 5% of patients
who develop cutaneous lesions are also susceptible to mucosal leishmaniasis23
,
30. In the state of São Paulo there are
approximately 400 new cases per year. Another substantial problem is the urbanization of
the infection. Autochthonous cases have been reported in urban areas. The incidence of
peri-urban and urban cases has been increasing. Approximately 10% of the population
living in endemic areas is at risk of acquiring the infection29. ATL is also considered one of the most common dermatological
syndromes diagnosed in travelers (or tourists) who have visited endemic areas15.The life cycle of L. (V.) braziliensis includes different reservoirs,
such as humans and wild and domestic mammals, as well as various vector species.
Therefore, Leishmania strains can be maintained in both rural and urban
settings, thereby affecting the epidemiology of the infection. Due to the proximity of
dogs and humans, studies have shown the important role of domestic dogs in ATL19
,
21. Studies using molecular techniques to
characterize L. (V.) braziliensis populations have contributed to a
better understanding of the abilities of these parasites and their vectors in adapting
to changes in their original forest habitats, and the consequent public health
implications13.Despite the significance of ATL to the Brazilian public health system, the genetic
diversity of L. (V.) braziliensis in some endemic areas of Brazil has
been poorly researched, as in the state of São Paulo. Therefore, this study aims to
analyze the genetic diversity of a L. (V.) braziliensis population
collected from patients and dogs in the state of São Paulo with cutaneous lesions,
avoiding in vitro cultivation. The reason for evaluating polymorphism
in humans and dogs was due to the importance of both species within the parasite's life
cycle. The results indicate a high variability in isolates collected in patients and
dogs from the state of São Paulo. Additionally, this study has shown the possibility of
performing genotyping directly on clinical samples without having to isolate the
parasite.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Human and dog samples: The selection of positive samples was made in
biopsies received by an in-house Laboratory over a period of nine years (2003 - 2012).
The biopsies were collected by medical or veterinary health services. The human or
canine lesions were cleansed with antiseptics after the administration of a local
anesthetic. The borders of the lesions were scraped or smears of material were obtained
by a punch biopsy of the lesions and immediately added to tubes containing 1-2 mL of a
sterile 0.85% NaCl and 200 µg/mL gentamicin solution, sent to the laboratory within 48
hours and promptly processed to confirm clinical diagnosis. All biopsies recorded were
from patients with the cutaneous clinical form. Samples were tested by routine
diagnosis, which included molecular and parasitological methods. The methodologies
applied were PCR, using two different sets of primers, and a parasitological method
(microscopic observation). These DNA samples were from patients and dogs living in 36
different municipalities and endemic areas for ATL in the state of São Paulo, Brazil
(Alumínio, Aruja, Avaré, Bauru, Bragança Paulista, Cajamar, Campinas, Caraguatatuba,
Cerquilho, Conhal, Cubatão, Guapiara, Guarulhos, Ibirá, Ilha Bela, Indaiatuba, Iperó,
Iporanga, Itapera, Itupeva, Jaboticabal, Jundiaí, Mairiporã, Marília, Miracatu,
Mirandópolis, Mogi Guaçu, Monte Mor, Pilar do Sul, Ribeira, Salto, São Paulo, Sorocaba,
Suzano, Tatuí, Tietê). Epidemiological registers of the different Public Dermatology
Clinics or Centers for Zoonosis Control were analyzed to determine the locality of the
Leishmania infection of each patient (or dog).Ethical considerations: This study was performed according to the
recommendations of the Human Ethics Committee (CONEP-IAL) and "Sociedade Brasileira de
Ciência em Animais de Laboratório/Colégio Brasileiro de Experimentação Animal"
(SBCAL/COBEA). Both Ethic Committees of Instituto Adolfo Lutz have approved of this
study.For genotype standardization, the
following WHO standard Leishmania strains were used: L. (V.)
guyanensis (MHOM/BR/1975/M4147), L. (L.)
amazonensis(IFLA/BR/1967/PH8), L. (L.) major
(MHOM/SU/1973/5-ASKH), L. (L.) infantum (MHOM/BR/1974/PP75), and
L. (V.) braziliensis(MHOM/BR/1975/M2903). The
Leishmania strains were maintained by serial passages and grown at
24 ºC in M-199 medium, supplemented with 10% calf serum and 0.25% hemin25. In the log phase, 1 x 108parasites
were harvested and washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2) at 1,000g for 10
min. The parasite pellets were used for DNA extraction. L. (V.)
braziliensis strain DNA also was used in reactions as a positive
control.DNA purification: Before performing DNA extraction, clinical samples and
WHO Leishmania reference strains were crushed and digested in a lysis
buffer until tissue lysis was complete, (This-HCl, 10 mM, pH 8.0; EDTA 10mM; SDS, 0,5%;
N-laurilsarcozil, 0.01%; proteinase K, 100 µg/mL) by incubation in water bath at 56 ºC.
Then, DNA molecules were extracted by a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen), according to the
manufacturer's instructions. DNA concentration and purity was determined by the ratio of
O. D. at 260 and 280 nm in a NanoDrop ND1000 (Thermo Scientific).
Routine Leishmania diagnosis
Parasitological diagnosis: Skin biopsy imprints were plated onto a glass
slide, fixed with methanol and stained with Giemsa11. The presence of amastigotes was observed microscopically with an
immersion objective (×1,000).PCR targets for The
Leishmania genus was identified by a 120-bp PCR product,
amplified from a conserved region of kDNA minicircles of
Leishmaniaspp. , using the primer set 150/15223. L. (V.) braziliensis was identified by an
amplified fragment of 146-149 bp from the multicopy spliced leader (SL) RNA gene
using the primer set LU-5A/LB-3C, which amplifies a 146-149 bp sequence from the
SL12
,
17. These tests were carried out under the
same aforementioned conditions11
,
12. To check PCR inhibitors, canine and human
samples were assayed using a reference gene, whose primer sets were GAPDH4F/GAPDH4R
and β1-β2, respectively, in the same conditions as previously described3
,
11. After the thermal cycles, PCR products
were electrophoresed in 2% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. DNA
fragments were made visible under UV illumination.Originally, 132 DNA extracts from biopsies,
positive for L. (V.) braziliensis, were analyzed for genotype
determination. PCR was used for diagnosis and genotyping directly from clinical DNA
samples. Each test was performed by adding 5 µL from each DNA template and 25 pmol
from each primer for a final volume of 25 µL. The amplifications were carried out
with a kit purchased from Promega (Go Taq Green Master Mix). The PCR mix (12.5 μL)
was composed of one unit of Taq DNA polymerase, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5; 50 mM KCl;
1.5 mM MgCl2; and 200 mM of each dNTP. In genotype reactions the primer
set used was IR1/IR2 (5'-GCTGTAGGTGAACCTGCAGCAGCTGGATCATT-3' and
5'-GCGGGTAGTCCTGCCAAACACTCAGGTCTG-3'), which amplified a 1-1.2-kb sequence from the
ITS region between the small and large subunits of the rDNA locus in a temperature
annealing at 56 ºC5. PCR-amplified products
were digested with a HhaI restriction enzyme, which were separated by electrophoresis
in an 8% polyacrylamide gel and stained with ethidium bromide. DNA fragments were
made visible under UV illumination. The images from reactions for diagnosis and
genotyping were analyzed by a MiniBIS Gel Imager and Documentation system
(BioSystematica). The size of the fragments was based on a comparison with
molecular-weight size markers. In genotyping reactions, the banding patterns were
used to group the isolates into genotypes with the same banding pattern for the
restriction enzyme.Quality assurance: Each DNA extraction batch included a DNA extraction
from Leishmania -free eukaryotic samples as a negative control. In
each reaction, a tube containing nuclease-free water and PCR mix was used as a blank
control. Separate rooms were used for i. DNA extraction, ii. PCR mix and primer
preparation, iii. the adding of DNA from clinical samples and positive control; and
iv. post-PCR agarose-gel electrophoresis analysis. DNA samples were assayed in
duplicate and at least twice.
RESULTS
The first experiments were conducted using the DNA extracted from WHO reference strains
to establish the genotype by RFLP-PCR, using the primer set IR1/IR2 and additional
treatment with HhaI enzymes.Figure 1 shows the
restriction patterns of the six WHO reference strains. L. (V.)
guyanensis and L. (V.) braziliensis showed the same
restriction profile. On the other hand, L. (L.) amazonensis, L.
(L.) major and L. (L.) infantum had specific restriction
profiles.
Fig. 1
Restriction patterns of PCR products digested with HhaI in DNA extracted from
standard Leishmania strains include the following: L.
(V.) guyanensis (MHOM/BR/1975/ M4147) (1), L. (L.)
amazonensis (IFLA/BR/1967/PH8) (2), L. (L.)
major(MHOM/SU/1973/5- ASKH) (3), L. (L.) infantum
(MHOM/BR/1974/PP75) (4), and L. (V.) braziliensis
(MHOM/BR/1975/M2903) (5). Digested products were resolved in 2% agarose gel
stained with ethidium bromide. MM, 50-bp ladder.
Next, genotype experiments were conducted on the 132 DNA samples taken from biopsies
with a positive parasitological and molecular diagnosis. All samples also tested
positive for L. (V.) braziliensis (in PCR), which was previously
determined by the LU-5A/LB-3C primer set, whose products range in size from 146 to 149
bp9
,
12
,
17. According the epidemiological registers of
the Public Dermatology Clinics and Centers for Zoonosis Control, all samples analyzed
were from patients or dogs with an autochthonous Leishmania infection
(in the same locality as the biopsy collection).Of the 132 DNA samples, only 52 (40%) were successfully genotyped, as 1 - 1.2 kb
products were amplified by the IR1/IR2 primer set. The other 80 samples were not
genotyped, as PCR products were not amplified by this primer set. As expected, no
amplification was detected in DNA extracted from DNA as a negative control and PCR
products were obtained for all positive controls.Table 1 shows the specification of the 52
genotyped samples in detail, which included the collection date of the biopsies (2003 -
2012), as well as the host (human or canine) and locality within the state of São Paulo.
The 52 samples were distributed in nine distinct patterns, as shown in Figure 2.
Table 1
Clinical samples genotyped by RFLP-PCR in this study
Sample code-month/year
Host
Municipality
Sample code-month/year
Host
Municipality
07-09/2003
Human
Sorocaba
1063-07/2008
Human
Sorocaba
18-09/2003
Human
Sorocaba
1153-11/2008
Human
Campinas
20-09/2003
Canine
Sorocaba
1324-02/2009
Human
Sorocaba
26-10/2003
Canine
Marilia
1622-08/2009
Human
Sorocaba
64-09/2004
Human
Sorocaba
1758-02/2010
Human
Jundiai
65-09/2004
Human
Sorocaba
1945-06/2010
Human
Jundiai
84-11/2004
Canine
Ilha Bela
1946-10/2010
Human
Jundiai
115-03/2005
Human
Sorocaba
1985-11/2010
Human
Bauru
125-03/2005
Human
Sorocaba
2001-12/2010
Human
Sorocaba
157-06/2005
Human
Itupeva
2036-02/2011
Canine
Iporanga
194-08/2005
Human
Sorocaba
2037-02/2011
Canine
Iporanga
253-11/2005
Human
Sorocaba
2038-02/2011
Canine
Iporanga
274-05/2006
Human
Mairiporã
2072-04/2011
Human
Iperó
275-05/2006
Human
Cajamar
2098-06/2011
Human
Sorocaba
279-05/2006
Human
Itapera
2135-09/2011
Human
Sorocaba
281-05/2006
Human
Sorocaba
2136-09/2011
Human
Sorocaba
282-05/2006
Human
Sorocaba
2150-09/2011
Human
Sorocaba
288-06/2006
Human
Itupeva
2151-09/2011
Human
Sorocaba
304-08/2006
Human
Sorocaba
2152-09/2011
Human
Sorocaba
327-08/2006
Canine
Avaré
2163-10/2011
Human
Sorocaba
354-10/2006
Human
Sorocaba
2302-01/2012
Human
Sorocaba
504-09/2007
Human
Sorocaba
2538-05/2012
Human
Sorocaba
560-12/2007
Human
Sorocaba
2656-07/2012
Human
Ribeira
684-03/2008
Human
Sorocaba
2657-07/2012
Human
Ribeira
829-05/2008
Human
Sorocaba
2658-07/2012
Human
Ribeira
832-05/2008
Canine
Caraguatatuba
2883-12/2012
Human
Iperó
Fig. 2
Amplified products (1-1.2 kb) of clinical samples of the ITS region between
the small and large subunits of rDNA locus from L. (V.)
braziliensis were digested with HhaI (RFLP patterns). Among the 52
clinical samples, nine restriction patterns were shown. Digested products were
resolved in 8% polyacrylamide gels stained with ethidium bromide. MM, 50-bp
ladder.
Pattern 1 was identical to those found in L. (V.) guyanensis and
L. (V.) braziliensis WHO reference strains (Fig. 1). Furthermore, this L. (V.)
braziliensispattern was the most common, since out of the 52 genotyped samples,
29 (56%) belonged to pattern 1 and were distributed across 11 different municipalities.
Pattern 2 was recurrent in nine samples distributed across three municipalities. The
other patterns (3 - 9) were uncommon and found in few samples: Pattern 3 (three
municipalities), 4 (two municipalities), 5 (one municipality), 6 (one municipality), 7
(one municipality), 8 (two municipalities), 9 (two municipalities), respectively. The
details and distribution of the clinical samples from the 44 humanpatients and eight
dogs for each L. (V. ) braziliensis isolate are shown in Table 2 and Figure
3. The majority (30) of the samples were from Sorocaba. The others (22) were
distributed across the other 14 municipalities.
Table 2
Distribution of the nine L. (V.) braziliensis profiles
isolated from human and canine clinical samples in 15 municipalities of the state
of São Paulo
L. (V.) braziliensis
genotyping (n)
Municipality
(n=15)
Human
Canine
Pattern 1 (29 samples)
Bauru
1
-
Cajamar
1
-
Caraguatatuba
-
1
Iperó
2
-
Iporanga
-
2
Itapera
1
-
Itupeva
2
-
Jundiai
2
-
Mairiporã
1
-
Ribeira
2
-
Sorocaba
13
1
Pattern 2 (9 samples)
Jundiai
1
-
Ribeira
1
-
Sorocaba
7
-
Pattern 3 (3 samples)
Avaré
-
1
Marilia
-
1
Sorocaba
1
-
Pattern 4 (2 samples)
Campinas
1
-
Sorocaba
1
-
Pattern 5 (1 sample)
Sorocaba
1
-
Pattern 6 (2 samples)
Sorocaba
2
-
Pattern 7 (2 samples)
Sorocaba
2
-
Pattern 8 (2 samples)
Iporanga
-
1
Sorocaba
1
-
Pattern 9 (2 samples)
Ilha Bela
-
1
Sorocaba
1
-
Total of samples
44
8
Fig. 3
Map of South America and Brazil (A) indicating the location of the state of
São Paulo (A). Map of the state of São Paulo (B) indicating the municipalities
studied and geographical distribution of the L. (V.)
braziliensispatterns: 1 (red), 2 (yellow), 3 (green), 4 (blue), 5
(purple), 6 (orange), 7 (pink), 8 (light blue) and 9 (gray).
DISCUSSION
ATL has been growing worldwide in both incidence and range, principally due the increase
in human migration. This mobility contributes to the emergence of leishmanial infection
in low or non-endemic areas13. To prevent new
cases in these areas, epidemiological strategies must be implemented, such as rapid
diagnosis, treatment and vector control. The importance of the study of genetic
variability of Leishmania is mainly due to its correlation with the
epidemiological aspects of the disease, such as geographic location, clinical forms,
virulence, pathogenicity, drug resistance and antigenic variation, among others6
,
13.Species belonging to the L. (V.) braziliensis sub-genera are highly
prevalent in patients with ATL in Brazil. Other Brazilian studies have shown the genetic
variability of these parasites, which would explain their adaptation to changes in
diverse environmental conditions4
,
6. Thus, with such resilience, these parasites
are more likely to infect multiple hosts. Although different genetic studies have
analyzed L. (V.) braziliensis isolates from other Brazilian
regions4
,
6
,
10
,
11
,
21
,
27, none have been conducted in the state of São
Paulo.The idea of conducting this study in the state of São Paulo was motivated by the state's
increase of ATL incidences for the last 20 years. Currently, 147 municipalities have
already recorded transmission. Thus, in this study, biopsies from 24.5% of these
municipalities (36) were investigated. However, due to the low sensitivity of the
IR1/IR2 primer set, samples from only 15 municipalities were genotyped.One of the methods used to evaluate the genetic polymorphism of L. (V.)
braziliensis isolates in different Brazilian regions is the analysis of RFLP
in the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) locus. These
studies have shown that molecular markers are suitable for population genetics and
epidemiological studies4
,
5
,
6.Despite the low sensitivity of the IR1/IR2 primer set and that the clinical samples
presented a low quantity of parasites in comparison with culture isolates, 40% (52/132)
of them were genotyped. Similar data has previously shown20 the possibility of performing RFLP-PCR using small amounts of
Leishmania DNA from host tissues. Consequently, it is possible to
genotype Leishmania populations with the analysis of DNA extracted
directly from clinical samples. This information is important, because in many
laboratories there are no conditions in which to isolate and culture parasites from
clinical samples20. Another interesting finding
was the fact that DNA samples isolated 11 years ago (2003) were of good quality and
could be used to genotype L. (V.) braziliensis isolates, as shown in
Table 1.Results showed that L (V.) braziliensis seems to be a species with
great genetic diversity, as nine different patterns were observed in 52 different DNA
samples from 15 municipalities using PCR-RFLP. As shown in Figure 3, the different L (V.) braziliensispatterns
were spread throughout the regions. This genetic variability has already been shown in
other Brazilian studies4
,
10
,
11
,
21
,
27. Additionally, the parasite polymorphism was
correlated with different clinical forms of the disease, effectiveness of treatment and
cytokines expression10
,
21
,
27.According to other studies4
,
6
,
23
,
29, genotypic variations exhibited by L
(V.) braziliensis could be explained by the adaption of parasites to changes
in the transmission process, as originally, the biological cycle was restricted to
forest environments. Similar to in other Brazilian regions, the gradual removal of
vegetation has also occurred in São Paulo in recent years29. As a result, these parasites have adapted to infect a wider diversity of
sand flies and reservoirs.
Authors: Elisa Cupolillo; Lúcia Regina Brahim; Cristiane B Toaldo; Manoel Paes de Oliveira-Neto; Maria Edileuza Felinto de Brito; Aloisio Falqueto; Maricleide de Farias Naiff; Gabriel Grimaldi Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: O Fernandes; M Bozza; J M Pascale; A B de Miranda; U G Lopes; W M Degrave Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz Date: 1996 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.743
Authors: Aparecida H S Gomes; Isabelle M R Ferreira; Maria L S R Lima; Elaine A Cunha; Andrea S Garcia; Maria F L Araújo; Vera L Pereira-Chioccola Journal: Vet Parasitol Date: 2006-12-28 Impact factor: 2.738
Authors: A Schriefer; A L F Schriefer; A Góes-Neto; L H Guimarães; L P Carvalho; R P Almeida; P R Machado; H A Lessa; A Ribeiro de Jesus; L W Riley; E M Carvalho Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Maria de Fátima Madeira Md; Cláudia M Antunes Uchôa; Cristianni Antunes Leal; Roger M Macedo Silva; Rosemere Duarte; Ciléia M Magalhães; Cathia Maria Barrientos Serra Journal: Rev Soc Bras Med Trop Date: 2003-10-21 Impact factor: 1.581