Literature DB >> 26200533

Difference of opinion - Inflatable Penile Prosthesis - Opinion: Why I prefer the infrapubic access.

Eduardo B Bertero1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26200533      PMCID： PMC4752131          DOI： 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.03.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN： 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Minimally invasive infrapubic inflatable penile implant.

Authors:  Paul E Perito
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction: erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation.

Authors:  Konstantinos Hatzimouratidis; Edouard Amar; Ian Eardley; Francois Giuliano; Dimitrios Hatzichristou; Francesco Montorsi; Yoram Vardi; Eric Wespes
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Streamlined approach for infrapubic placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis.

Authors:  Edward Karpman
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-05-28

4.  Early history of inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a view from someone who was there.

Authors:  David F Mobley
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.